Data

The impact of a promised financial incentive on response to a postal survey sent to Australian general practitioners: Dataset

The University of Newcastle
Balakrishnan Nair (Aggregated by) Christopher Oldmeadow (Aggregated by) Evans Tiffany (Aggregated by) Mariko Carey (Aggregated by) R W Sanson-Fisher (Aggregated by)
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=1959.13/1423611&rft.title=The impact of a promised financial incentive on response to a postal survey sent to Australian general practitioners: Dataset&rft.identifier=1959.13/1423611&rft.publisher=The University of Newcastle&rft.description=This data were collected from a randomised sample of 964 Australian general practitioners, with the aim of examining the impact a small financial incentive has on response rate and speed of the sample to a cross-sectional postal survey. Attached data includes; condition, ARIA status, survey sent date, survey return date. The response rate was calculated from the survey sent and return dates. ARIA status measures the remoteness of responders using a calculation of road networks. This research was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council via a Dementia Research Team grant (APP1095078). Mariko Carey is supported by a NHMRC Boosting Dementia Research Leadership Fellowship (APP1136168). This research was also supported by infrastructure funding from the Hunter Medical Research Institute. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.&rft.creator=Balakrishnan Nair&rft.creator=Christopher Oldmeadow&rft.creator=Evans Tiffany&rft.creator=Mariko Carey&rft.creator=R W Sanson-Fisher&rft.creator=Rhee Joel&rft.creator=Simon Keith Chiu&rft.creator=alison zucca&rft.date=2025&rft_rights=CC-BY-4.0&rft_subject=physician&rft_subject=incentive&rft_subject=primary health care&rft_subject=cross-sectional studies&rft_subject=surveys and questionnaires&rft_subject=research activities&rft_subject=research participation&rft_subject=participation rate&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data
Cite Saved to MyRDA Save to MyRDA

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

CC-BY-4.0

Full description

This data were collected from a randomised sample of 964 Australian general practitioners, with the aim of examining the impact a small financial incentive has on response rate and speed of the sample to a cross-sectional postal survey. Attached data includes; condition, ARIA status, survey sent date, survey return date. The response rate was calculated from the survey sent and return dates. ARIA status measures the remoteness of responders using a calculation of road networks. This research was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council via a Dementia Research Team grant (APP1095078). Mariko Carey is supported by a NHMRC Boosting Dementia Research Leadership Fellowship (APP1136168). This research was also supported by infrastructure funding from the Hunter Medical Research Institute. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Issued: 2021-07-07

Created: 2025-06-11

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph
Help

Related People

Subjects
cross-sectional studies | incentive | participation rate | physician | primary health care | research activities | research participation | surveys and questionnaires |

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers