Data

Supporting data for A global review of determinants of native bee assemblages in urbanised landscapes

Curtin University
Kit Prendergast (Aggregated by)
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25917/5ee094cf16249&rft.title=Supporting data for A global review of determinants of native bee assemblages in urbanised landscapes&rft.identifier=10.25917/5ee094cf16249&rft.publisher=Curtin University&rft.description=Dataset 1: A global assessment of determinants of native bee assemblages in urbanised landscapes: literature review (A global assessment of determinants of native bee assemblages in urbanised landscapes_lit review.xlsx) Dataset 2: Responses of bee abundance (positive, negative or non-significant) in relation to various local & landscape potential explanatory variables according to guild & taxonomic categories. (Bee guild & taxon responses to environmental variables in urban areas- abundance.xlsx) Dataset 3: Responses of bee species richness (positive, negative or non-significant) in relation to various local & landscape potential explanatory variables according to guild & taxonomic categories. (Bee guild & taxon responses to environmental variables in urban areas- spp richness.xlsx) Dataset 1: Kit Prendergast conducted a systematic review of published literature on bees in urban areas. From August 2016 to Dec 2019 searches were performed in Google Scholar using terms: “bees, pollinators, insects, arthropods, urbanisation, cities, urban, land-use change, native bees, wild bees, suburban, metropolis” or combinations thereof. Cited literature was accessed and incorporated where appropriate. Landscape and habitat types were assigned according to categories provided by text authors. For single-species publications we excluded those on honeybees, as honeybee numbers are largely impacted by husbandry factors. Dataset 2: Assessments of how bee abundance responded to environmental variables in urban areas were made based on a review of the literature (see Dataset 1). Dataset 3: Assessments of how bee species richness responded to environmental variables in urban areas were made based on a review of the literature (see Dataset 1). This complete dataset contains 3 spreadsheets and requires Microsoft Excel.PLEASE NOTE THIS DATASET HAS BEEN REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH THE VERSION LINKED BELOW.&rft.creator=Kit Prendergast&rft.date=2020&rft_rights=Free for re-use under a CC BY: Attribution 4.0 licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&rft_rights=CC BY: Attribution 4.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&rft_subject=urban ecology&rft_subject=native bees&rft_subject=bees&rft_subject=wild bees&rft_subject=urbanisation&rft_subject=literature review&rft_subject=systematic review&rft_subject=pollinators&rft_subject=insects&rft_subject=cities&rft_subject=Landscape Ecology&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS&rft_subject=Conservation and Biodiversity&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT&rft_subject=Community Ecology&rft_subject=BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=ECOLOGY&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Other view details
Unknown

CC BY: Attribution 4.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Free for re-use under a CC BY: Attribution 4.0 licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Access:

Open view details

Free for re-use under a CC BY: Attribution 4.0 licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Full description

Dataset 1: A global assessment of determinants of native bee assemblages in urbanised landscapes: literature review (A global assessment of determinants of native bee assemblages in urbanised landscapes_lit review.xlsx) Dataset 2: Responses of bee abundance (positive, negative or non-significant) in relation to various local & landscape potential explanatory variables according to guild & taxonomic categories. (Bee guild & taxon responses to environmental variables in urban areas- abundance.xlsx) Dataset 3: Responses of bee species richness (positive, negative or non-significant) in relation to various local & landscape potential explanatory variables according to guild & taxonomic categories. (Bee guild & taxon responses to environmental variables in urban areas- spp richness.xlsx) Dataset 1: Kit Prendergast conducted a systematic review of published literature on bees in urban areas. From August 2016 to Dec 2019 searches were performed in Google Scholar using terms: “bees, pollinators, insects, arthropods, urbanisation, cities, urban, land-use change, native bees, wild bees, suburban, metropolis” or combinations thereof. Cited literature was accessed and incorporated where appropriate. Landscape and habitat types were assigned according to categories provided by text authors. For single-species publications we excluded those on honeybees, as honeybee numbers are largely impacted by husbandry factors. Dataset 2: Assessments of how bee abundance responded to environmental variables in urban areas were made based on a review of the literature (see Dataset 1). Dataset 3: Assessments of how bee species richness responded to environmental variables in urban areas were made based on a review of the literature (see Dataset 1). This complete dataset contains 3 spreadsheets and requires Microsoft Excel.


PLEASE NOTE THIS DATASET HAS BEEN REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH THE VERSION LINKED BELOW.

Click to explore relationships graph
Identifiers