Data

SoLT Seminar : The future of academic publishing.

La Trobe University
Ruth Jelley (Aggregated by)
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.26181/22647952.v1&rft.title=SoLT Seminar : The future of academic publishing.&rft.identifier=https://doi.org/10.26181/22647952.v1&rft.publisher=La Trobe University&rft.description=Academia and academic publishing operate as two parts of an ecosystem. As in any ecosystem, they are dependent on each other: academics 'publish or perish', academic content is the essential element in the publishing process. But given that academia is publicly funded and publishing is a profit-making venture increasingly exposed to shareholder expectation, this dependent relationship is an uneasy one for many academics. Academia and academic publishing are driven by very different motivations. Academics must balance competing priorities in the university system; the need to provide quality materials for their students and the need to reduce their impact on faculty budgets. Taking these elements into negotiations with publishers who are engaging in increasingly aggressive sales tactics creates a volatile environment. It is important for academics and faculty staff to be fully aware of their obligations under university rules and education sector legislation. Ruth Jelley has been researching open education practices with the Faculty of Business, Economics and Law Teaching and Learning team since late 2012. &rft.creator=Ruth Jelley&rft.date=2023&rft_rights=CC-BY-NC-4.0&rft_subject=academic publishing&rft_subject=academia&rft_subject=open education&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Non-Commercial Licence view details
CC-BY-NC

CC-BY-NC-4.0

Full description

Academia and academic publishing operate as two parts of an ecosystem. As in any ecosystem, they are dependent on each other: academics 'publish or perish', academic content is the essential element in the publishing process. But given that academia is publicly funded and publishing is a profit-making venture increasingly exposed to shareholder expectation, this dependent relationship is an uneasy one for many academics. Academia and academic publishing are driven by very different motivations. Academics must balance competing priorities in the university system; the need to provide quality materials for their students and the need to reduce their impact on faculty budgets. Taking these elements into negotiations with publishers who are engaging in increasingly aggressive sales tactics creates a volatile environment. It is important for academics and faculty staff to be fully aware of their obligations under university rules and education sector legislation. Ruth Jelley has been researching open education practices with the Faculty of Business, Economics and Law Teaching and Learning team since late 2012. 

Issued: 2013-01-01

Created: 2023-04-18

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph
Subjects

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers