Data

Revegetation rewilds the soil bacterial microbiome of an old field- Part 1: OTU raw data matrix

Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
Gellie, Nicholas ; Mills, Jacob ; Breed, Martin ; Lowe, Andy
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.4227/05/5878480a91885&rft.title=Revegetation rewilds the soil bacterial microbiome of an old field- Part 1: OTU raw data matrix&rft.identifier=10.4227/05/5878480a91885&rft.publisher=Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network&rft.description=The authors analyzed a total of 3,002,411 quality-filtered bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences in the 48 technical replicates across 8 revegetation chronosequence sites, consisting of 3,316 OTUs. Nine bacterial phyla dominated this dataset, including Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Firmicutes, Gemmatimonadetes, Planctomycetes, Proteobacteria and Verrucomicrobia.The OTU data provide information on bacterial flux at this restoration site through a stagger of years and can be used accordingly.EDNA metabarcoding: Three 25 m x 25 m quadrats were randomly selected per site, giving a total of 24 quadrats across the 8 sites. Soil was sampled from the 0-10 cm and 20-30 cm soil horizons at each quadrat. A representative 50 g sample of soil was collected at each of these 24 quadrats by pooling nine soil samples from each soil depth, including soil from open areas and under plants. These nine soil samples were pooled into a sterile plastic bag, and homogenised using a sterilised trowel. All soil samples (n = 48) were frozen on site in sterile 50 mL falcon tubes until DNA extraction- hereafter referred to as technical replicates.Progress Code: completedMaintenance and Update Frequency: notPlanned&rft.creator=Gellie, Nicholas &rft.creator=Mills, Jacob &rft.creator=Breed, Martin &rft.creator=Lowe, Andy &rft.date=2017&rft.edition=1.0&rft.coverage=The study system was an active restoration site at Mt Bold, a water catchment reserve of the Mt Lofty Ranges in South Australia (35.07;S, 138.42 E). This catchment was dominated by an open eucalypt woodland that has historically been subjected to tree clearance and grazing that began early in the 20th century. In this context, the native understory and most of the overstory was cleared and replaced by a grassland dominated by introduced grasses. At the study site, grazing ceased in 2003 when South Australia's water utility (SA Water) took over management. SA Water has actively restored the study site since 2005, with the restoration goal of recreating the local Eucalyptus leucoxylon dominated grassy woodland community.&rft.coverage=northlimit=-35.08139; southlimit=-35.10306; westlimit=138.65032; eastLimit=138.68512; projection=EPSG:3577&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0&rft_rights=TERN services are provided on an as-is and as available basis. Users use any TERN services at their discretion and risk. They will be solely responsible for any damage or loss whatsoever that results from such use including use of any data obtained through TERN and any analysis performed using the TERN infrastructure. <br />Web links to and from external, third party websites should not be construed as implying any relationships with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by TERN. <br /><br />Please advise any work or publications that use this data via the online form at https://www.tern.org.au/research-publications/#reporting&rft_rights=Please cite this dataset as {Author} ({PublicationYear}). {Title}. {Version, as appropriate}. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. Dataset. {Identifier}.&rft_rights=(C)2017 University of Adelaide. Rights owned by University of Adelaide.&rft_subject=biota&rft_subject=environment&rft_subject=SOILS&rft_subject=RECLAMATION/REVEGETATION/RESTORATION&rft_subject=MICROBIAL CHANGES&rft_subject=Landscape Ecology&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS&rft_subject=Conservation and Biodiversity&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT&rft_subject=SOIL SCIENCES&rft_subject=Terrestrial Ecology&rft_subject=BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=ECOLOGY&rft_subject=MICROBIOLOGY&rft_subject=OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=GENETICS&rft_subject=latitude (Degree)&rft_subject=Degree&rft_subject=longitude (Degree)&rft_subject=field species name (Unitless)&rft_subject=Unitless&rft_subject=OTU count (Number)&rft_subject=Number&rft_subject=30 meters - < 100 meters&rft_subject=< 1 meter&rft_subject=one off&rft_subject=Biodiversity Inventory&rft_subject=Ecological Succession&rft_subject=Experimental Ecology&rft_subject=Landscape Ecology&rft_subject=Long-Term Community Monitoring&rft_subject=Long-Term Species Monitoring&rft_subject=Molecular Ecology&rft_subject=Restoration Ecology&rft_subject=Soil Ecology&rft_subject=Carbon Dynamics&rft_subject=Eucalypt Open Woodlands&rft_subject=Eucalypt Woodlands&rft_subject=Modified Native Vegetation&rft_subject=Revegetation&rft_subject=Microbial Ecology&rft_subject=Soil microbiome&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

TERN services are provided on an "as-is" and "as available" basis. Users use any TERN services at their discretion and risk. They will be solely responsible for any damage or loss whatsoever that results from such use including use of any data obtained through TERN and any analysis performed using the TERN infrastructure.
Web links to and from external, third party websites should not be construed as implying any relationships with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by TERN.

Please advise any work or publications that use this data via the online form at https://www.tern.org.au/research-publications/#reporting

Please cite this dataset as {Author} ({PublicationYear}). {Title}. {Version, as appropriate}. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. Dataset. {Identifier}.

(C)2017 University of Adelaide. Rights owned by University of Adelaide.

Access:

Open view details

unclassified

Contact Information

Street Address:
Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
Building 1019, 80 Meiers Rd
QLD 4068
Australia
Ph: +61 7 3365 9097

esupport@tern.org.au

Brief description

The authors analyzed a total of 3,002,411 quality-filtered bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences in the 48 technical replicates across 8 revegetation chronosequence sites, consisting of 3,316 OTUs. Nine bacterial phyla dominated this dataset, including Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Firmicutes, Gemmatimonadetes, Planctomycetes, Proteobacteria and Verrucomicrobia.The OTU data provide information on bacterial flux at this restoration site through a stagger of years and can be used accordingly.

Lineage

EDNA metabarcoding: Three 25 m x 25 m quadrats were randomly selected per site, giving a total of 24 quadrats across the 8 sites. Soil was sampled from the 0-10 cm and 20-30 cm soil horizons at each quadrat. A representative 50 g sample of soil was collected at each of these 24 quadrats by pooling nine soil samples from each soil depth, including soil from open areas and under plants. These nine soil samples were pooled into a sterile plastic bag, and homogenised using a sterilised trowel. All soil samples (n = 48) were frozen on site in sterile 50 mL falcon tubes until DNA extraction- hereafter referred to as technical replicates.

Progress Code: completed
Maintenance and Update Frequency: notPlanned

Notes

Credit
We at TERN acknowledge the Traditional Owners and Custodians throughout Australia, New Zealand and all nations. We honour their profound connections to land, water, biodiversity and culture and pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging.
The authors thank A. Bissett, A. Fitzgerald, A. Young, Z. Baruch, S. Caddy-Retalic, L. Clarke, S. Kennedy, I. Fox, M. Laws, K. McCallum, and J. McDonald for technical and field assistance. We are grateful for technical, field and site access support from the Australian Genome Research Facility, BioPlatforms Australia, SA Water and the Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. This work was supported by Australian Research Council funding to AJL and MFB (DE150100542; DP150103414).
Purpose
This project forms part of the authors PhD. The OTU data was generated for a manuscript in Molecular Ecology "Revegetation rewilds the soil bacterial microbiome of an old field" https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14081 that uses eDNA assessment to provide a significant extension to current restoration monitoring practice.
Data Quality Information

Revegetation rewilds the soil bacterial microbiome of an old field.
doi : https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/am-pdf/10.1111/mec.14081Unpaywall

Created: 2014-12-17

Issued: 2017-01-13

Modified: 2014-07-14

Data time period: 2014-12-17 to 2014-12-18

This dataset is part of a larger collection

138.68512,-35.08139 138.68512,-35.10306 138.65032,-35.10306 138.65032,-35.08139 138.68512,-35.08139

138.66772,-35.092225

text: The study system was an active restoration site at Mt Bold, a water catchment reserve of the Mt Lofty Ranges in South Australia (35.07;S, 138.42 E). This catchment was dominated by an open eucalypt woodland that has historically been subjected to tree clearance and grazing that began early in the 20th century. In this context, the native understory and most of the overstory was cleared and replaced by a grassland dominated by introduced grasses. At the study site, grazing ceased in 2003 when South Australia's water utility (SA Water) took over management. SA Water has actively restored the study site since 2005, with the restoration goal of recreating the local Eucalyptus leucoxylon dominated grassy woodland community.