Data

Price and Values Impact Renewable Energy Support

University of New England, Australia
Phillips, Keri ; Hine, Donald ; Phillips, Wendy
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.4226/95/5b04cf57991ca&rft.title=Price and Values Impact Renewable Energy Support&rft.identifier=10.4226/95/5b04cf57991ca&rft.publisher=University of New England, Australia&rft.description=The survey comprised demographic items and measures to assess both political and values orientations. These were followed by contingent choice questions to assess participants’ support for the 50% RET at eight cost amounts. Abstract: This study investigated how projected electricity prices and personal values influence public support for a 50% renewable energy target (RET) in Australia. In an online experiment, 404 participants rated their support for a 50% RET across eight projected increases in their quarterly power bills. Multi-level modelling indicated that: (1) support for the 50% RET fell as the projected price of electricity increased, (2) although participants with low self-enhancement values and high self-transcendent values were most supportive of the 50% RET, these value-based differences disappeared as projected electricity prices increased. We discuss the implications of these findings for energy policy design and communications.&rft.creator=Phillips, Keri &rft.creator=Hine, Donald &rft.creator=Phillips, Wendy &rft.date=2018&rft.coverage=northlimit=-9.6532506590176; southlimit=-44.986924119902; westlimit=111.57775729894; eastLimit=155.87463229895; projection=WGS84&rft_rights= http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au&rft_rights=&rft_rights=Rights holder: University of New England&rft_subject=Social and Community Psychology&rft_subject=PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES&rft_subject=PSYCHOLOGY&rft_subject=Renewable Power and Energy Systems Engineering (excl. Solar Cells)&rft_subject=ENGINEERING&rft_subject=ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING&rft_subject=Renewable Energy not elsewhere classified&rft_subject=ENERGY&rft_subject=RENEWABLE ENERGY&rft_subject=Psychosocial aspects of childbirth and perinatal mental health&rft_subject=Midwifery&rft_subject=HEALTH SCIENCES&rft_subject=Electrical energy generation (incl. renewables, excl. photovoltaics)&rft_subject=Electrical engineering&rft_subject=ENGINEERING&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Non-Derivative Licence view details
CC-BY-NC-ND

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au

Rights holder: University of New England

Access:

Other view details

Mediated

Contact Information

kphill26@myune.edu.au

Full description

The survey comprised demographic items and measures to assess both political and values orientations. These were followed by contingent choice questions to assess participants’ support for the 50% RET at eight cost amounts. Abstract: This study investigated how projected electricity prices and personal values influence public support for a 50% renewable energy target (RET) in Australia. In an online experiment, 404 participants rated their support for a 50% RET across eight projected increases in their quarterly power bills. Multi-level modelling indicated that: (1) support for the 50% RET fell as the projected price of electricity increased, (2) although participants with low self-enhancement values and high self-transcendent values were most supportive of the 50% RET, these value-based differences disappeared as projected electricity prices increased. We discuss the implications of these findings for energy policy design and communications.

Notes

Related Publications
Thesis title, How Projected Electricity Price and Personal Values Influence Support for a 50% Renewable Energy Target in Australia

Issued: 2018-05-21

Date Submitted : 2018-05-21

Data time period: 2016-11-02 to 2016-12-01

This dataset is part of a larger collection

155.87463,-9.65325 155.87463,-44.98692 111.57776,-44.98692 111.57776,-9.65325 155.87463,-9.65325

133.72619479894,-27.32008738946

Identifiers