Data

Public support for renewable energy: Do values matter? - Study 2: Values typology for renewable energy support

University of New England, Australia
Phillips, Keri ; Hine, Don ; Phillips, Wendy
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25952/ptr4-6y35&rft.title=Public support for renewable energy: Do values matter? - Study 2: Values typology for renewable energy support&rft.identifier=10.25952/ptr4-6y35&rft.publisher=University of New England&rft.description=This study created a typology of participants based on their personal values and investigated whether climate change beliefs, climate change concern, energy preferences, and support for a 50% renewable energy target (RET) vary as a function of values-type. Australian residents (N = 633) completed Schwartz’s (2017) Personal Values Questionnaire (PVQ-RR) and rated their climate change beliefs, concern about climate change, energy source preferences, and 50% RET support. Latent profile analysis identified four values-based segments based on participants’ PVQ-RR scores: Free-Spirits (12%), Power-Achievers (28%), Traditionalists (16%), and Normatives (44%). Multivariate analysis of variance indicated that the Free-Spirits group expressed stronger belief in anthropogenic climate change and greater climate change concern than the Power-Achiever and Traditionalist groups. Free-Spirits also expressed stronger preferences for solar energy and weaker preferences for coal than Power-Achievers, and greater support for the 50% RET than the Power-Achiever and Traditionalist groups. These results indicate that a values-based typology may be useful to understand the roots of climate change concern and energy preferences, as well as how to best engage with each segment within the typology.&rft.creator=Phillips, Keri &rft.creator=Hine, Don &rft.creator=Phillips, Wendy &rft.date=2020&rft.coverage=-,.&rft_rights=Rights holder: Keri Phillips&rft_subject=Social and Community Psychology&rft_subject=PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES&rft_subject=PSYCHOLOGY&rft_subject=Renewable Energy not elsewhere classified&rft_subject=ENERGY&rft_subject=RENEWABLE ENERGY&rft_subject=Environment policy&rft_subject=Policy and administration&rft_subject=HUMAN SOCIETY&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

view details

Rights holder: Keri Phillips

Access:

Other view details

Mediated

Contact Information

keri.phillips@une.edu.au

Full description

This study created a typology of participants based on their personal values and investigated whether climate change beliefs, climate change concern, energy preferences, and support for a 50% renewable energy target (RET) vary as a function of values-type. Australian residents (N = 633) completed Schwartz’s (2017) Personal Values Questionnaire (PVQ-RR) and rated their climate change beliefs, concern about climate change, energy source preferences, and 50% RET support. Latent profile analysis identified four values-based segments based on participants’ PVQ-RR scores: Free-Spirits (12%), Power-Achievers (28%), Traditionalists (16%), and Normatives (44%). Multivariate analysis of variance indicated that the Free-Spirits group expressed stronger belief in anthropogenic climate change and greater climate change concern than the Power-Achiever and Traditionalist groups. Free-Spirits also expressed stronger preferences for solar energy and weaker preferences for coal than Power-Achievers, and greater support for the 50% RET than the Power-Achiever and Traditionalist groups. These results indicate that a values-based typology may be useful to understand the roots of climate change concern and energy preferences, as well as how to best engage with each segment within the typology.

Issued: 2020-08-31

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph
Identifiers