Data

Oscar I Roos and Yee-Fui Ng, 'Act of Grace Payments and the Constitution ' (2024) 46(1) Sydney Law Review 55-86

Deakin University
Oscar Roos (Aggregated by) Yee-Fui Ng (Aggregated by)
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.26187/deakin.27023692.v1&rft.title=Oscar I Roos and Yee-Fui Ng, 'Act of Grace Payments and the Constitution ' (2024) 46(1) Sydney Law Review 55-86&rft.identifier=10.26187/deakin.27023692.v1&rft.publisher=Deakin University&rft.description=This article focuses on a hitherto underexplored but increasingly important areaof public expenditure: act of grace payments. Act of grace payments arevoluntary, highly discretionary gifts of money made by the executive in theabsence of any legal duty to do so. The expenditure on such payments in Australiahas been significant, and a lack of transparency creates serious risks to integrity.Further, the cases of Pape v Federal Commissioner of Taxation, Williams vCommonwealth and Williams v Commonwealth [No 2] have transformed theconstitutional framework for public expenditure. Accordingly, this articleconducts a fine-grained analysis of the constitutional legality of act of gracepayments at the Commonwealth, state and territory levels. The authors argue thatthere are significant constitutional issues with act of grace payments at theCommonwealth level, and that many state-based act of grace payments are likelyto be illegal. To address these issues, and to reduce the risk that payments will bemade illegally, the authors recommend several legislative and soft law changes.&rft.creator=Oscar Roos&rft.creator=Yee-Fui Ng&rft.date=2024&rft_rights= https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&rft_subject=Law and legal studies&rft_subject=Act of Grace Payments&rft_subject=Ex Gratia Payments&rft_subject=Pape v Federal Commissioner of Taxation&rft_subject=Williams v Commonwealth [No 1]&rft_subject=Williams v Commonwealth [No 2]&rft_subject=Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act Scheme&rft_subject=Compensation for Detriment Caused by Defective Administration Scheme&rft_subject=State Spending Powers&rft_subject=Territory Spending Powers&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Full description

This article focuses on a hitherto underexplored but increasingly important area

of public expenditure: act of grace payments. Act of grace payments are

voluntary, highly discretionary gifts of money made by the executive in the

absence of any legal duty to do so. The expenditure on such payments in Australia

has been significant, and a lack of transparency creates serious risks to integrity.

Further, the cases of Pape v Federal Commissioner of Taxation, Williams v

Commonwealth and Williams v Commonwealth [No 2] have transformed the

constitutional framework for public expenditure. Accordingly, this article

conducts a fine-grained analysis of the constitutional legality of act of grace

payments at the Commonwealth, state and territory levels. The authors argue that

there are significant constitutional issues with act of grace payments at the

Commonwealth level, and that many state-based act of grace payments are likely

to be illegal. To address these issues, and to reduce the risk that payments will be

made illegally, the authors recommend several legislative and soft law changes.

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph
Identifiers
ACN 633 798 857