Data
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.26180/32329845.v2&rft.title=KMS Framework evaluation subset&rft.identifier=https://doi.org/10.26180/32329845.v2&rft.publisher=Monash University&rft.description=A socio‑technical Knowledge Management System (KMS) Framework for evaluating biomedical information systems that support open scholarship is proposed. The Framework spans nine knowledge‑lifecycle processes—discovery, creation, representation, classification, storage, retrieval, dissemination, transfer, and translation—and aligns them with people, process, technology, and content elements. Using an action research approach that combined expert interviews and literature reviews, the Framework is applied to three systems: Europe PMC, Epistemonikos, and ResearchGate. The evaluation identified exemplary components and recurring gaps, particularly in downstream knowledge transfer and translation, which are often overlooked by repository checklists. Findings demonstrate the Framework’s value as a comprehensive, transparent lens for comparing systems, diagnosing weaknesses, and prioritizing enhancements across the full knowledge lifecycle. &rft.creator=Frada Burstein&rft.creator=Kerry Tanner&rft.creator=Lisa Kruesi&rft.date=2026&rft_rights=CC-BY-4.0&rft_subject=Knowledge management framework&rft_subject=Open scholarship&rft_subject=Knowledge repositories&rft_subject=Biomedicine&rft_subject=Action research&rft_subject=Other biomedical and clinical sciences not elsewhere classified&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

CC-BY-4.0

Full description

A socio‑technical Knowledge Management System (KMS) Framework for evaluating biomedical information systems that support open scholarship is proposed. The Framework spans nine knowledge‑lifecycle processes—discovery, creation, representation, classification, storage, retrieval, dissemination, transfer, and translation—and aligns them with people, process, technology, and content elements. Using an action research approach that combined expert interviews and literature reviews, the Framework is applied to three systems: Europe PMC, Epistemonikos, and ResearchGate. The evaluation identified exemplary components and recurring gaps, particularly in downstream knowledge transfer and translation, which are often overlooked by repository checklists. Findings demonstrate the Framework’s value as a comprehensive, transparent lens for comparing systems, diagnosing weaknesses, and prioritizing enhancements across the full knowledge lifecycle.

Issued: 2026-05-20

Created: 2026-05-20

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph
Subjects

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers
ACN 633 798 857