Data

Karawatha Peri-urban Site, Southeast Queensland, Habitat Structure Dataset, 2007-2008

Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
Kampmann, Saara ; Hero, Jean-Marc
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25901/2s3c-qn69&rft.title=Karawatha Peri-urban Site, Southeast Queensland, Habitat Structure Dataset, 2007-2008&rft.identifier=10.25901/2s3c-qn69&rft.publisher=Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network&rft.description=The data set contains information on the Habitat structure of the Karawatha Peri-urban site, southeast Queensland. There are two data sets: 1) information on Canopy cover percentage from the study plots and 2) information on the Ground cover properties such as the number of hits/strikes of the 'bare ground', 'rock', 'herbs', 'grass', 'shrubs', 'trees' and 'cwd', along each transect in the core plot.Canopy cover and ground cover estimates for 33 one-hectare plots in Karawatha Forest Park. The plots are at 500 m intervals in a grid that covers the entire Park. Each plot follows the elevational contour and is 250 m long x 40 m wide. Canopy cover was measured using photographs taken at 50 m intervals along the 250 m mid-line of the plot. Ground cover was measured using the point-intercept method at 2 m intervals along the mid-line. Surveys were completed during the period October 2007 to February 2008. 1) Determination of canopy cover: Canopy cover can be defined as the extent of coverage of the forest floor by the vertical projection of tree crowns (Jennings et al., 1999). The percentage canopy cover was measured along a 250m transect located 5m to the left- hand side and parallel to the plot midline (ie. the same transect that lizard surveys are conducted on; from now on, referred to as the “vegetation transect”). A measure of canopy cover or CGF (Canopy Gap Fraction) was obtained using a modified method by Zancola et al. (2000). A Seimax Super 0.35X semi fisheye lens (MVC-FD73) was used with a Sony Digital “Mavica” camera to photograph the canopy every 50m, therefore giving six measures for each plot. The photographs were converted into black and white images using Paintshop Pro software, and then opened in Image Pro where the numbers of pixels were counted. An estimate of canopy cover for each image was reached by dividing the total number of pixels by the number of black pixels. Percentage canopy cover for the entire plot was then calculated by averaging the six estimates. 2) Determination of percentage ground cover: Ground substrate refers to shrubs (up to 2m), leaf litter, rock, bare ground, grasses, coarse woody debris (CWD) and herbs. The percentage cover of all ground substrates was calculated using the point- transect method (referred to as the “line- point transect method” in Bonham (1989)). A wooden dowel, 2m in length and 9.5mm diameter was used to probe the ground at 2m intervals along the 250m vegetation transect (a total of 125 points per plot) and all substrates that the pole intercepted were recorded. This included termite mounds and trees however these variables were removed from any analyses because they were recorded in very low numbers. Percentage cover of total ground substrates and the percentage cover of each individual component (eg. rock, shrub etc.), always summed to 100%. The frequency of touches for each component was also recorded. 3) Determination of leaf litter depth: Leaf litter depth was measured by using the same wooden dowel as above, which had markings in 1cm increments from the base. For the purpose of this study, leaf litter depth can be defined as the vertical distance from the highest dead particle in contact with the wooden dowel, to the bottom of the litter layer (Brown & Nelson, 1993). Litter depth measurements were taken every 2m along the 250m vegetation transect. A total of 125 measures per plot were recorded and these were averaged to obtain an estimate of litter depth for the plot. References: 1) Jennings, S.B; Brown, N.D. and Sheill, D. (1999). Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures. Forestry. 72: 59-73 2) Zancola, B. J., Wild, C.H. and Hero J.M. (2000). Inhibition of Ageratina riparia (Asteraceae) by native Australian Flora and fauna. Austral Ecology 25: 563-569. 3) Bonham, C.D. (1989). Measurements for Terrestrial Vegetation. John Wiley and Sons: New York, New York, USA. 4) Brown, G.W. and Nelson, J.L. (1993). Influence of successional stage of Eucalyptus regnans (Mountain Ash) on habitat use by reptiles in Central Highlands, Victoria. Australian Journal of Ecology. 18: 405- 417.Progress Code: completedMaintenance and Update Frequency: notPlanned&rft.creator=Kampmann, Saara &rft.creator=Hero, Jean-Marc &rft.date=2008&rft.edition=1&rft.coverage=The Karawatha site is on the southern peri-urban edge of Brisbane. It contains a variety of habitats from freshwater lagoons and sandstone ridges, to dry eucalypt forests and wet heath.&rft.coverage=northlimit=-27.61; southlimit=-27.65; westlimit=153.06; eastLimit=153.1; projection=EPSG:4326&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0&rft_rights=TERN services are provided on an as-is and as available basis. Users use any TERN services at their discretion and risk. They will be solely responsible for any damage or loss whatsoever that results from such use including use of any data obtained through TERN and any analysis performed using the TERN infrastructure. <br />Web links to and from external, third party websites should not be construed as implying any relationships with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by TERN. <br /><br />Please advise any work or publications that use this data via the online form at https://www.tern.org.au/research-publications/#reporting&rft_rights=Please cite this dataset as {Author} ({PublicationYear}). {Title}. {Version, as appropriate}. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. Dataset. {Identifier}.&rft_rights=Please note: This data has been migrated “as is” from TERN’s SuperSite data portal. Minimal quality assessment has been applied to this data. Please contact the dataset authors for queries regarding the data.&rft_rights=All PPBio data will be made public within 2 years of collection, as long as those responsible for the collection are credited in any publications that use the data. We recommend that those interested in using these data contact the relevant data collectors to discuss the possibility of co-authorship. It is also suggested that you download and read the PPBio Data Policy and Procedures.&rft_subject=environment&rft_subject=biota&rft_subject=COMMUNITY STRUCTURE&rft_subject=EARTH SCIENCE&rft_subject=BIOSPHERE&rft_subject=ECOLOGICAL DYNAMICS&rft_subject=COMMUNITY DYNAMICS&rft_subject=FOREST COMPOSITION/VEGETATION STRUCTURE&rft_subject=VEGETATION&rft_subject=VEGETATION COVER&rft_subject=Terrestrial Ecology&rft_subject=BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=ECOLOGY&rft_subject=Karawatha Peri-Urban, core1ha&rft_subject=latitude (Degree)&rft_subject=Degree&rft_subject=longitude (Degree)&rft_subject=bare ground cover (Number)&rft_subject=Number&rft_subject=live grass cover mean (Number)&rft_subject=rock ground cover (Number)&rft_subject=mean crown cover (Percent)&rft_subject=Percent&rft_subject=500 meters - < 1 km&rft_subject=Monthly - < Annual&rft_subject=Habitat Structure&rft_subject=Canopy Cover&rft_subject=Bare Ground&rft_subject=Herbs&rft_subject=Shrubs&rft_subject=Trees&rft_subject=Vegetation Cover&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

TERN services are provided on an "as-is" and "as available" basis. Users use any TERN services at their discretion and risk. They will be solely responsible for any damage or loss whatsoever that results from such use including use of any data obtained through TERN and any analysis performed using the TERN infrastructure.
Web links to and from external, third party websites should not be construed as implying any relationships with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by TERN.

Please advise any work or publications that use this data via the online form at https://www.tern.org.au/research-publications/#reporting

Please cite this dataset as {Author} ({PublicationYear}). {Title}. {Version, as appropriate}. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. Dataset. {Identifier}.

Please note: This data has been migrated “as is” from TERN’s SuperSite data portal. Minimal quality assessment has been applied to this data. Please contact the dataset authors for queries regarding the data.

All PPBio data will be made public within 2 years of collection, as long as those responsible for the collection are credited in any publications that use the data. We recommend that those interested in using these data contact the relevant data collectors to discuss the possibility of co-authorship. It is also suggested that you download and read the PPBio Data Policy and Procedures.

Access:

Open view details

unclassified

Contact Information

Street Address:
Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
Building 1019, 80 Meiers Rd
QLD 4068
Australia
Ph: +61 7 3365 9097

[email protected]

Brief description

The data set contains information on the Habitat structure of the Karawatha Peri-urban site, southeast Queensland. There are two data sets: 1) information on Canopy cover percentage from the study plots and 2) information on the Ground cover properties such as the number of hits/strikes of the 'bare ground', 'rock', 'herbs', 'grass', 'shrubs', 'trees' and 'cwd', along each transect in the core plot.

Lineage

Canopy cover and ground cover estimates for 33 one-hectare plots in Karawatha Forest Park. The plots are at 500 m intervals in a grid that covers the entire Park. Each plot follows the elevational contour and is 250 m long x 40 m wide. Canopy cover was measured using photographs taken at 50 m intervals along the 250 m mid-line of the plot. Ground cover was measured using the point-intercept method at 2 m intervals along the mid-line. Surveys were completed during the period October 2007 to February 2008.

1) Determination of canopy cover: Canopy cover can be defined as the extent of coverage of the forest floor by the vertical projection of tree crowns (Jennings et al., 1999). The percentage canopy cover was measured along a 250m transect located 5m to the left- hand side and parallel to the plot midline (ie. the same transect that lizard surveys are conducted on; from now on, referred to as the “vegetation transect”). A measure of canopy cover or CGF (Canopy Gap Fraction) was obtained using a modified method by Zancola et al. (2000). A Seimax Super 0.35X semi fisheye lens (MVC-FD73) was used with a Sony Digital “Mavica” camera to photograph the canopy every 50m, therefore giving six measures for each plot. The photographs were converted into black and white images using Paintshop Pro software, and then opened in Image Pro where the numbers of pixels were counted. An estimate of canopy cover for each image was reached by dividing the total number of pixels by the number of black pixels. Percentage canopy cover for the entire plot was then calculated by averaging the six estimates.

2) Determination of percentage ground cover: Ground substrate refers to shrubs (up to 2m), leaf litter, rock, bare ground, grasses, coarse woody debris (CWD) and herbs. The percentage cover of all ground substrates was calculated using the point- transect method (referred to as the “line- point transect method” in Bonham (1989)). A wooden dowel, 2m in length and 9.5mm diameter was used to probe the ground at 2m intervals along the 250m vegetation transect (a total of 125 points per plot) and all substrates that the pole intercepted were recorded. This included termite mounds and trees however these variables were removed from any analyses because they were recorded in very low numbers. Percentage cover of total ground substrates and the percentage cover of each individual component (eg. rock, shrub etc.), always summed to 100%. The frequency of touches for each component was also recorded.

3) Determination of leaf litter depth: Leaf litter depth was measured by using the same wooden dowel as above, which had markings in 1cm increments from the base. For the purpose of this study, leaf litter depth can be defined as the vertical distance from the highest dead particle in contact with the wooden dowel, to the bottom of the litter layer (Brown & Nelson, 1993). Litter depth measurements were taken every 2m along the 250m vegetation transect. A total of 125 measures per plot were recorded and these were averaged to obtain an estimate of litter depth for the plot. References:

1) Jennings, S.B; Brown, N.D. and Sheill, D. (1999). Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures. Forestry. 72: 59-73

2) Zancola, B. J., Wild, C.H. and Hero J.M. (2000). Inhibition of Ageratina riparia (Asteraceae) by native Australian Flora and fauna. Austral Ecology 25: 563-569.

3) Bonham, C.D. (1989). Measurements for Terrestrial Vegetation. John Wiley and Sons: New York, New York, USA.

4) Brown, G.W. and Nelson, J.L. (1993). Influence of successional stage of Eucalyptus regnans (Mountain Ash) on habitat use by reptiles in Central Highlands, Victoria. Australian Journal of Ecology. 18: 405- 417.

Progress Code: completed
Maintenance and Update Frequency: notPlanned

Notes

Credit
We at TERN acknowledge the Traditional Owners and Custodians throughout Australia, New Zealand and all nations. We honour their profound connections to land, water, biodiversity and culture and pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging.

Created: 2007-10-01

Issued: 2008-02-29

Modified: 2025-12-11

Data time period: 2007-10-01 to 2008-02-29

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

153.1,-27.61 153.1,-27.65 153.06,-27.65 153.06,-27.61 153.1,-27.61

153.08,-27.63

text: The Karawatha site is on the southern peri-urban edge of Brisbane. It contains a variety of habitats from freshwater lagoons and sandstone ridges, to dry eucalypt forests and wet heath.