Full description
Leks are the quintessential example of female mate choice, yet male-male interactions at leks may predominate. How, and how much, female mate choice versus male-male competition contribute to precopulatory sexual selection, including whether they are aligned or antagonistic, matters to theory and our understanding of how selection acts on both males and females. For example, if male-male competition predominates and selection favours harmful, dominant males, then female and population fitness may be compromised. Here, using Drosophila melanogaster, we performed two artificial selection experiments in parallel where we altered selection to favour male-male competition (selection for winners and losers in multi-male competition trials) or female mate choice (selection for winners and losers in single-male latency trials). After seven generations of selection, males from winner-selected lines had higher mating success than males from loser-selected lines in both competitive and non-competitive arenas. Our results support the idea that the outcomes of male-male competition and female choice are aligned or that one process dominates the other.Notes
Associated PersonsNirjana Dewan (Creator)
Issued: 2025-05-07
Subjects
Drosophila melanogaster |
FOS: Biological sciences |
Male mating success |
artifical selection |
female mate choice |
male-male competition |
User Contributed Tags
Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover
Identifiers
- DOI : 10.5061/DRYAD.F1VHHMH6V
- global : a358b961-2d13-460c-b530-293c2d3d1b20