Data

Ground Level Predator–Prey Interactions and Rainforest Structure Across 18 Permanent Plots, Cassowary Coast Region, Australia 2023

Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
Raven, Charlotte ; Nahrung, Helen ; Mackintosh, Emma ; Marshall, Andrew ; Howe, Andy
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25901/e9jt-tt26&rft.title=Ground Level Predator–Prey Interactions and Rainforest Structure Across 18 Permanent Plots, Cassowary Coast Region, Australia 2023&rft.identifier=10.25901/e9jt-tt26&rft.publisher=Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network&rft.description=This dataset contains measurements of predation rates, predator abundance, and environmental variables collected in September 2023 across 18 permanent 20 × 20 m study plots in tropical rainforest of the Cassowary Coast Region, Wet Tropics World Heritage Area, North Queensland, Australia. Predation was quantified using 360 artificial plasticine caterpillars exposed for seven days and inspected for predator attack marks, alongside concurrent pitfall trapping of ground-dwelling arthropods (ants, carabid beetles, and crickets). Environmental data include tree and vine stem counts, species identifications, basal area, aboveground biomass estimates, vine-to-tree ratios, leaf area index from hemispherical photographs, litter depth, and coarse woody debris surveys. These data were collected following standardised ecological protocols to support analysis of predator–prey interactions, vegetation structure, and rainforest disturbance dynamics.Environmental data were collected from rainforest plots using standardised forest inventory methods. All trees and climbing plants with diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥ 1 cm were measured, with vines classified as either woody lianas or climbing monocots (including rattans). Basal area, stem density, and vine-to-tree ratios were calculated per plot. Tree aboveground biomass was estimated using a pan-tropical allometric equation with a standardised wood density value. Canopy structure was assessed from hemispherical photographs to calculate leaf area index (LAI). Litter depth was measured at multiple points per plot and averaged, and coarse woody debris was quantified along transects. All variables were quality checked for consistency prior to analysis.Progress Code: completedMaintenance and Update Frequency: notPlanned&rft.creator=Raven, Charlotte &rft.creator=Nahrung, Helen &rft.creator=Mackintosh, Emma &rft.creator=Marshall, Andrew &rft.creator=Howe, Andy &rft.date=2026&rft.edition=1.0&rft.coverage=The study was conducted in eighteen permanent study plots (20 × 20 m) positioned across a gradient of forest disturbance, of the Forest Restoration and Climate Experiment (FoRCE; https://force-experiment.com/) in tropical rainforest of the Cassowary Coast Region (17° 52' S, 146° 06' E) in the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area, North Queensland, Australia&rft.coverage=northlimit=-17.901585168472; southlimit=-17.901764831528; westlimit=146.07212559804; eastLimit=146.07231440196; projection=EPSG:4326&rft.coverage=northlimit=-17.911640168472; southlimit=-17.911819831528; westlimit=146.080680592687; eastLimit=146.080869407313; projection=EPSG:4326&rft.coverage=northlimit=-17.817700168472; southlimit=-17.817879831528; westlimit=146.094700642563; eastLimit=146.094889357437; projection=EPSG:4326&rft.coverage=northlimit=-17.890390168472; southlimit=-17.890569831528; westlimit=146.089275603996; eastLimit=146.089464396004; projection=EPSG:4326&rft.coverage=northlimit=-17.862510168472; southlimit=-17.862689831528; westlimit=146.10711561881; eastLimit=146.10730438119; projection=EPSG:4326&rft.coverage=northlimit=-17.881170168472; southlimit=-17.881349831528; westlimit=146.093790608898; eastLimit=146.093979391102; projection=EPSG:4326&rft.coverage=northlimit=-17.767460168472; southlimit=-17.767639831528; westlimit=146.091780669112; eastLimit=146.091969330888; projection=EPSG:4326&rft.coverage=northlimit=-17.815820168472; southlimit=-17.815999831528; westlimit=146.097825643558; eastLimit=146.098014356442; projection=EPSG:4326&rft.coverage=northlimit=-17.766830668472; southlimit=-17.767010331528; westlimit=146.092347169444; eastLimit=146.092535830556; projection=EPSG:4326&rft.coverage=northlimit=-17.890245168472; southlimit=-17.890424831528; westlimit=146.088800604073; eastLimit=146.088989395927; projection=EPSG:4326&rft.coverage=northlimit=-17.859144668472; southlimit=-17.859324331528; westlimit=146.065851620597; eastLimit=146.066040379403; projection=EPSG:4326&rft.coverage=northlimit=-17.817407668472; southlimit=-17.817587331528; westlimit=146.098663142718; eastLimit=146.098851857282; projection=EPSG:4326&rft.coverage=northlimit=-17.817260168472; southlimit=-17.817439831528; westlimit=146.097062642796; eastLimit=146.097251357204; projection=EPSG:4326&rft.coverage=northlimit=-17.860336168472; southlimit=-17.860515831528; westlimit=146.061499619964; eastLimit=146.061688380036; projection=EPSG:4326&rft.coverage=northlimit=-17.856595168472; southlimit=-17.856774831528; westlimit=146.06167112195; eastLimit=146.06185987805; projection=EPSG:4326&rft.coverage=northlimit=-17.849901668472; southlimit=-17.850081331528; westlimit=146.059800625501; eastLimit=146.059989374499; projection=EPSG:4326&rft.coverage=northlimit=-17.766849668472; southlimit=-17.767029331528; westlimit=146.091766169434; eastLimit=146.091954830566; projection=EPSG:4326&rft.coverage=northlimit=-17.667303168472; southlimit=-17.667482831528; westlimit=146.024196721778; eastLimit=146.024385278222; projection=EPSG:4326&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0&rft_rights=TERN services are provided on an as-is and as available basis. Users use any TERN services at their discretion and risk. They will be solely responsible for any damage or loss whatsoever that results from such use including use of any data obtained through TERN and any analysis performed using the TERN infrastructure. <br />Web links to and from external, third party websites should not be construed as implying any relationships with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by TERN. <br /><br />Please advise any work or publications that use this data via the online form at https://www.tern.org.au/research-publications/#reporting&rft_rights=Please cite this dataset as {Author} ({PublicationYear}). {Title}. {Version, as appropriate}. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. Dataset. {Identifier}.&rft_subject=environment&rft_subject=biota&rft_subject=BIOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION&rft_subject=EARTH SCIENCE&rft_subject=ANIMAL ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR&rft_subject=AGRICULTURE&rft_subject=ANIMAL SCIENCE&rft_subject=TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS&rft_subject=BIOSPHERE&rft_subject=TROPICAL RAINFOREST&rft_subject=ANIMALS/INVERTEBRATES&rft_subject=ARTHROPODS&rft_subject=INSECTS&rft_subject=DISTURBANCE&rft_subject=VEGETATION&rft_subject=ECOLOGY&rft_subject=BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=Terrestrial Ecology&rft_subject=Invertebrate Biology&rft_subject=ZOOLOGY&rft_subject=Forest biodiversity&rft_subject=Evolutionary ecology&rft_subject=Community ecology (excl. invasive species ecology)&rft_subject=tree basal area (Square Centimetre)&rft_subject=Square Centimetre&rft_subject=stand stem density (Count)&rft_subject=Count&rft_subject=litter ground cover (Centimetre)&rft_subject=Centimetre&rft_subject=elevation (Metre)&rft_subject=Metre&rft_subject=leaf area index (Unitless)&rft_subject=Unitless&rft_subject=slope angle (Degree per Metre)&rft_subject=Degree per Metre&rft_subject=coarse woody debris cover (Count)&rft_subject=above-ground standing plant biomass (Kilogram per Hectare)&rft_subject=Kilogram per Hectare&rft_subject=vine-to-tree ratio (Unitless)&rft_subject=ant count (Number)&rft_subject=Number&rft_subject=cricket count (Number)&rft_subject=species richness (Unitless)&rft_subject=10 km - < 50 km or approximately .09 degree - < .5 degree&rft_subject=one off&rft_subject=hill diversity index&rft_subject=predation proportion&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

TERN services are provided on an "as-is" and "as available" basis. Users use any TERN services at their discretion and risk. They will be solely responsible for any damage or loss whatsoever that results from such use including use of any data obtained through TERN and any analysis performed using the TERN infrastructure.
Web links to and from external, third party websites should not be construed as implying any relationships with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by TERN.

Please advise any work or publications that use this data via the online form at https://www.tern.org.au/research-publications/#reporting

Please cite this dataset as {Author} ({PublicationYear}). {Title}. {Version, as appropriate}. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. Dataset. {Identifier}.

Access:

Open view details

unclassified

Contact Information

Street Address:
Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
Building 1019, 80 Meiers Rd
QLD 4068
Australia
Ph: +61 7 3365 9097

[email protected]

Brief description

This dataset contains measurements of predation rates, predator abundance, and environmental variables collected in September 2023 across 18 permanent 20 × 20 m study plots in tropical rainforest of the Cassowary Coast Region, Wet Tropics World Heritage Area, North Queensland, Australia. Predation was quantified using 360 artificial plasticine caterpillars exposed for seven days and inspected for predator attack marks, alongside concurrent pitfall trapping of ground-dwelling arthropods (ants, carabid beetles, and crickets). Environmental data include tree and vine stem counts, species identifications, basal area, aboveground biomass estimates, vine-to-tree ratios, leaf area index from hemispherical photographs, litter depth, and coarse woody debris surveys. These data were collected following standardised ecological protocols to support analysis of predator–prey interactions, vegetation structure, and rainforest disturbance dynamics.

Lineage

Environmental data were collected from rainforest plots using standardised forest inventory methods. All trees and climbing plants with diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥ 1 cm were measured, with vines classified as either woody lianas or climbing monocots (including rattans). Basal area, stem density, and vine-to-tree ratios were calculated per plot. Tree aboveground biomass was estimated using a pan-tropical allometric equation with a standardised wood density value. Canopy structure was assessed from hemispherical photographs to calculate leaf area index (LAI). Litter depth was measured at multiple points per plot and averaged, and coarse woody debris was quantified along transects. All variables were quality checked for consistency prior to analysis.

Progress Code: completed
Maintenance and Update Frequency: notPlanned

Notes

Credit
We at TERN acknowledge the Traditional Owners and Custodians throughout Australia, New Zealand and all nations. We honour their profound connections to land, water, biodiversity and culture and pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging.
Purpose
The data were collected to quantify predation pressure and predator activity in relation to rainforest vegetation structure and disturbance history. Artificial caterpillars provide a standardised measure of relative predation rates across broad predator groups, while pitfall trapping captures the abundance of ground-dwelling arthropod predators. Vegetation and environmental measurements, including tree and vine structure, aboveground biomass, litter depth, and coarse woody debris, were collected to characterise habitat conditions and allow testing of how forest composition and structural complexity influence predator–prey interactions. Together, these data provide a baseline for understanding the ecological role of predators in disturbed and recovering tropical rainforests of the Wet Tropics region.
Data Quality Information

Data Quality Assessment Scope
local : dataset
The dataset was collected following standardised ecological field protocols to ensure consistency and comparability with other tropical rainforest studies. All measurements of trees and vines (≥1 cm DBH) followed established inventory methods, with species identifications conducted by trained observers and verified against regional floras where possible. Artificial caterpillar predation assays were deployed and retrieved using consistent placement, exposure time, and handling procedures to minimise observer bias and accidental damage. Predator attack marks were assessed under stereomicroscopy by a single trained observer to maintain scoring consistency, using published reference guides for bite mark identification. Arthropod samples from pitfall traps were sorted to morphospecies and identified to genus or species by taxonomic specialists. Environmental variables, including aboveground biomass, leaf area index, litter depth, and coarse woody debris, were measured using standardised, published methods. Data were recorded in the field on paper datasheets and later transcribed into digital format with subsequent verification. All continuous variables were standardised and checked for outliers prior to analysis. Together, these procedures provide a high level of confidence in the accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility of the dataset.

Created: 2023-09-03

Issued: 2026-02-25

Modified: 2026-03-02

Data time period: 2023-09-03 to 2023-09-20

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

146.07231,-17.90159 146.07231,-17.90176 146.07213,-17.90176 146.07213,-17.90159 146.07231,-17.90159

146.07222,-17.901675

146.08087,-17.91164 146.08087,-17.91182 146.08068,-17.91182 146.08068,-17.91164 146.08087,-17.91164

146.080775,-17.91173

146.09489,-17.8177 146.09489,-17.81788 146.0947,-17.81788 146.0947,-17.8177 146.09489,-17.8177

146.094795,-17.81779

146.08946,-17.89039 146.08946,-17.89057 146.08928,-17.89057 146.08928,-17.89039 146.08946,-17.89039

146.08937,-17.89048

146.1073,-17.86251 146.1073,-17.86269 146.10712,-17.86269 146.10712,-17.86251 146.1073,-17.86251

146.10721,-17.8626

146.09398,-17.88117 146.09398,-17.88135 146.09379,-17.88135 146.09379,-17.88117 146.09398,-17.88117

146.093885,-17.88126

146.09197,-17.76746 146.09197,-17.76764 146.09178,-17.76764 146.09178,-17.76746 146.09197,-17.76746

146.091875,-17.76755

146.09801,-17.81582 146.09801,-17.816 146.09783,-17.816 146.09783,-17.81582 146.09801,-17.81582

146.09792,-17.81591

146.09254,-17.76683 146.09254,-17.76701 146.09235,-17.76701 146.09235,-17.76683 146.09254,-17.76683

146.0924415,-17.7669205

146.08899,-17.89025 146.08899,-17.89042 146.0888,-17.89042 146.0888,-17.89025 146.08899,-17.89025

146.088895,-17.890335

146.06604,-17.85914 146.06604,-17.85932 146.06585,-17.85932 146.06585,-17.85914 146.06604,-17.85914

146.065946,-17.8592345

146.09885,-17.81741 146.09885,-17.81759 146.09866,-17.81759 146.09866,-17.81741 146.09885,-17.81741

146.0987575,-17.8174975

146.09725,-17.81726 146.09725,-17.81744 146.09706,-17.81744 146.09706,-17.81726 146.09725,-17.81726

146.097157,-17.81735

146.06169,-17.86034 146.06169,-17.86052 146.0615,-17.86052 146.0615,-17.86034 146.06169,-17.86034

146.061594,-17.860426

146.06186,-17.8566 146.06186,-17.85677 146.06167,-17.85677 146.06167,-17.8566 146.06186,-17.8566

146.0617655,-17.856685

146.05999,-17.8499 146.05999,-17.85008 146.0598,-17.85008 146.0598,-17.8499 146.05999,-17.8499

146.059895,-17.8499915

146.09195,-17.76685 146.09195,-17.76703 146.09177,-17.76703 146.09177,-17.76685 146.09195,-17.76685

146.0918605,-17.7669395

146.02439,-17.6673 146.02439,-17.66748 146.0242,-17.66748 146.0242,-17.6673 146.02439,-17.6673

146.024291,-17.667393

text: The study was conducted in eighteen permanent study plots (20 × 20 m) positioned across a gradient of forest disturbance, of the Forest Restoration and Climate Experiment (FoRCE; https://force-experiment.com/) in tropical rainforest of the Cassowary Coast Region (17° 52' S, 146° 06' E) in the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area, North Queensland, Australia

Other Information
Point-of-truth metadata URL

uri : https://geonetwork.tern.org.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/4c440c00-058d-4343-a990-453b1fc9bc78

Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees

doi : https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12629

Gerwing, J. J., Schnitzer, S. A., Burnham, R. J., Bongers, F., Chave, J., DeWalt, S. J., . . . Martínez‐Ramos, M. (2006). A standard protocol for liana censuses 1. Biotropica: The Journal of Biology and Conservation, 38(2), 256-261.

uri : http://ctfs.si.edu/Public/pdfs/Gerwing_etal_biotropica_2006.pdf

MARTHEWS, T., RIUTTA, T., OLIVERAS MENOR, I., URRUTIA, R., MOORE, S., METCALFE, D., MALHI, Y., PHILLIPS, O., HUARACA HUASCO, W. & RUIZ JAÉN, M. 2014. Measuring tropical forest carbon allocation and cycling: a RAINFOR-GEM field manual for intensive census plots (v3. 0). Manual, Global Ecosystems Monitoring network.

uri : https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:f33a0929-4675-43c6-91a3-8cbcda962775

Low, P. A., Sam, K., McArthur, C., Posa, M. R. C., & Hochuli, D. F. (2014). Determining predator identity from attack marks left in model caterpillars: guidelines for best practice. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 152(2), 120-126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12207

doi : https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eea.12207

Howe, A., Lövei, G. L., & Nachman, G. (2009). Dummy caterpillars as a simple method to assess predation rates on invertebrates in a tropical agroecosystem. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 131(3), 325-329. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.2009.00860.x

doi : https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2009.00860.x?msockid=1664843f78626e801ab995657c6268e3