Data

Gladstone megaherbivore exclusion data 2017

James Cook University
Scott, A
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25903/x0qp-pm46&rft.title=Gladstone megaherbivore exclusion data 2017&rft.identifier=10.25903/x0qp-pm46&rft.publisher=James Cook University&rft.description=Gladstone megaherbivore exclusion study carried out at South Trees seagrass meadow from August to November 2017.Abstract [Related Publication]: Grazing by all members of an herbivore community can act to structure the ecosystems they feed on. The outcome of this grazing pressure on the plant community also depends on the interaction between different herbivore groups that are present. We carried out a three-month multi-level field exclusion experiment to understand how different groups of herbivores act both individually and interactively to structure a subtropical seagrass meadow in the Great Barrier Reef. Megaherbivore grazing had the largest impact on this seagrass meadow, significantly reducing aboveground biomass and shoot height, whereas there was no measurable impact of meso- or macroherbivores on seagrass metrics or epiphyte biomass. Megaherbivores here grazed broadly across the meadow instead of targeting grazing in one area. The principal seagrass-herbivore dynamic in this meadow is that megaherbivores are the main group modifying meadow structure, and other grazer groups that are present in lower numbers do not individually or interactively structure the meadow. We demonstrate that herbivory by large grazers can significantly modify seagrass meadow characteristics. This has important implications when designing and interpreting the results of monitoring programs that seek to conserve seagrass meadows, the ecosystem services that they provide and the herbivores that rely on them. Collectively, our results and those of similar previous studies emphasize there is unlikely to be one seagrass and herbivory paradigm. Instead, for individual meadows, their unique species interactions and differences in biotic and abiotic drivers of seagrass change are likely to have a strong influence on the dominant seagrass-herbivore dynamic.The dataset consists of a workbook (saved in both MS Excel and Open Document formats) containing 6 spreadsheets. The first worksheet is a ReadMe file and lists the remaining worksheets and treatments as follows:Worksheets:Aboveground biomass: Aboveground biomass assessments from photos at the start and end of the studyShoot height: Shoot height measurements at the start and end of the experimentEpiphytes: Epiphyte weight per core and standardised to dry weight of seagrass in the sampleSG species composition: Shoot counts from the start of the experiment (Zc  Zostera capricorni, Hu Halodule uninervis, Ho Halophila ovalis)Mesoherbivores: Numbers of mesoherbivores in cores at the end of the experimentTreatments:Con         ControlPla         Plaster blockCar         Carbaryl blockFF         Macroherbivore frameFis         Macroherbivore cageFisCar Macroherbivore cage plus carbaryl blockMeg         Megaherbivore cageMegCar Megaherbivore cage plus carbaryl blockThe full methodology is available in the publication shown in the Related Publications link below.&rft.creator=Scott, A &rft.date=2020&rft.relation=https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-020-00868-0&rft.coverage=151.29786249091,-23.887535556692 151.29394233808,-23.887506633695 151.29020427618,-23.88858675038 151.28701421276,-23.890670151811 151.28468441345,-23.893552858007 151.28344293524,-23.896952647019 151.28341130267,-23.900536697043 151.28459261214,-23.903954175561 151.28687122887,-23.906870581559 151.29002410597,-23.909000479042 151.29374261786,-23.910135421398 151.29766277068,-23.910164339335 151.30140083258,-23.909084402881 151.304590896,-23.907001298134 151.30692069531,-23.90411889175 151.30816217352,-23.900719291159 151.3081938061,-23.897135246196 151.30701249662,-23.893717587446 151.30473387989,-23.890800884765 151.3015810028,-23.888670687471 151.29786249091,-23.887535556692&rft.coverage=South Trees Wharf, Gladstone, Queensland, Australia&rft_rights=&rft_rights=CC BY-NC 4.0: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0&rft_subject=seagrass&rft_subject=herbivores&rft_subject=Great Barrier Reef&rft_subject=Ecosystem Function&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS&rft_subject=Environmental Management&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT&rft_subject=Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)&rft_subject=BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=ECOLOGY&rft_subject=Ecosystem Assessment and Management of Coastal and Estuarine Environments&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENT&rft_subject=ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT&rft_subject=Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciences&rft_subject=EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE&rft_subject=EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE&rft_subject=Expanding Knowledge in the Environmental Sciences&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Non-Commercial Licence view details
CC-BY-NC

CC BY-NC 4.0: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Access:

Open view details

Open: free access under license

Full description

Gladstone megaherbivore exclusion study carried out at South Trees seagrass meadow from August to November 2017.

Abstract [Related Publication]: Grazing by all members of an herbivore community can act to structure the ecosystems they feed on. The outcome of this grazing pressure on the plant community also depends on the interaction between different herbivore groups that are present. We carried out a three-month multi-level field exclusion experiment to understand how different groups of herbivores act both individually and interactively to structure a subtropical seagrass meadow in the Great Barrier Reef. Megaherbivore grazing had the largest impact on this seagrass meadow, significantly reducing aboveground biomass and shoot height, whereas there was no measurable impact of meso- or macroherbivores on seagrass metrics or epiphyte biomass. Megaherbivores here grazed broadly across the meadow instead of targeting grazing in one area. The principal seagrass-herbivore dynamic in this meadow is that megaherbivores are the main group modifying meadow structure, and other grazer groups that are present in lower numbers do not individually or interactively structure the meadow. We demonstrate that herbivory by large grazers can significantly modify seagrass meadow characteristics. This has important implications when designing and interpreting the results of monitoring programs that seek to conserve seagrass meadows, the ecosystem services that they provide and the herbivores that rely on them. Collectively, our results and those of similar previous studies emphasize there is unlikely to be one seagrass and herbivory paradigm. Instead, for individual meadows, their unique species interactions and differences in biotic and abiotic drivers of seagrass change are likely to have a strong influence on the dominant seagrass-herbivore dynamic.

The dataset consists of a workbook (saved in both MS Excel and Open Document formats) containing 6 spreadsheets. The first worksheet is a ReadMe file and lists the remaining worksheets and treatments as follows:

Worksheets:

Aboveground biomass: Aboveground biomass assessments from photos at the start and end of the study

Shoot height: Shoot height measurements at the start and end of the experiment

Epiphytes: Epiphyte weight per core and standardised to dry weight of seagrass in the sample

SG species composition: Shoot counts from the start of the experiment (Zc  Zostera capricorni, Hu Halodule uninervis, Ho Halophila ovalis)

Mesoherbivores: Numbers of mesoherbivores in cores at the end of the experiment

Treatments:

Con         Control

Pla         Plaster block

Car         Carbaryl block

FF         Macroherbivore frame

Fis         Macroherbivore cage

FisCar Macroherbivore cage plus carbaryl block

Meg         Megaherbivore cage

MegCar Megaherbivore cage plus carbaryl block

The full methodology is available in the publication shown in the Related Publications link below.

Created: 2020-11-26

Data time period: 12 08 2017 to 16 11 2017

This dataset is part of a larger collection

151.29786,-23.88754 151.29394,-23.88751 151.2902,-23.88859 151.28701,-23.89067 151.28468,-23.89355 151.28344,-23.89695 151.28341,-23.90054 151.28459,-23.90395 151.28687,-23.90687 151.29002,-23.909 151.29374,-23.91014 151.29766,-23.91016 151.3014,-23.90908 151.30459,-23.907 151.30692,-23.90412 151.30816,-23.90072 151.30819,-23.89714 151.30701,-23.89372 151.30473,-23.8908 151.30158,-23.88867 151.29786,-23.88754

151.29580255439,-23.898835486515

text: South Trees Wharf, Gladstone, Queensland, Australia

Identifiers
  • Local : https://research.jcu.edu.au/data/published/107e4d5376b5f6e722a2cd1ff6d8462a
  • DOI : 10.25903/x0qp-pm46