Data

Evaluating error sources to improve precision in the co-registration of underwater 3D models

Australian Institute of Marine Science
Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS)
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=https://apps.aims.gov.au/metadata/view/c46d1882-cb48-4412-b62b-992580b86c18&rft.title=Evaluating error sources to improve precision in the co-registration of underwater 3D models&rft.identifier=https://apps.aims.gov.au/metadata/view/c46d1882-cb48-4412-b62b-992580b86c18&rft.publisher=Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS)&rft.description=Change detection is an essential and widely used approach for investigating ecosystem dynamics. Multi-temporal 3D models increasingly underpin photogrammetry-based analyses of change for many ecologically relevant attributes. To detect change, it is necessary to accurately align 3D models collected at different times using a process referred to as co-registration. However, achieving precise co-registration is difficult in underwater habitats due to practical challenges intrinsic to surveying them. These include a lack of accurate georeferencing information, variable light, turbidity and weather conditions, and diving restrictions dictated by the diver's pressure exposure over time. Here we present an efficient co-registration workflow for 3D models that directly addresses these challenges, derived from underwater structure-from-motion methods. To test our approach, we used 3D models from across a wide range of coral reef habitats covering all those that one may encounter in shallow reefs (15m depth and above). We then identified and empirically estimated four key sources of error: co-registration, 3D processing, image acquisition, and reference and scaling features (RSF) placement, and quantified their relative contributions to the overall error. Our proposed co-registration workflow had a mean precision of 1.37±16.55mm. Image acquisition and RSF placement errors contributed the most to the total workflow error (37% and 53%, respectively), while the contribution of co-registration and 3D processing errors was minimal (3% and 7%, respectively). As a result of our analysis, we provide ‘good practice’ guidelines to reduce errors associated with photogrammetric workflows and to facilitate efficient and reliable detection of 3D change in complex underwater ecosystems.This study was conducted as part of the Ecological Intelligence for Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program (EcoRRAP) (https://gbrrestoration.org/program/ecorrap/). Underwater imagery was collected using EcoRRAP 3D photogrammetry techniques described by Gordon et al. (2023).Maintenance and Update Frequency: notPlannedStatement: 3D models are created from raw imagery collected using Nikon D850 DSLRs 3D models of the same sites were produced to evaluate the precision of the workflow&rft.creator=Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) &rft.date=2026&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Australia License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/au/&rft_rights=Use Limitation: All AIMS data, products and services are provided as is and AIMS does not warrant their fitness for a particular purpose or non-infringement. While AIMS has made every reasonable effort to ensure high quality of the data, products and services, to the extent permitted by law the data, products and services are provided without any warranties of any kind, either expressed or implied, including without limitation any implied warranties of title, merchantability, and fitness for a particular purpose or non-infringement. AIMS make no representation or warranty that the data, products and services are accurate, complete, reliable or current. To the extent permitted by law, AIMS exclude all liability to any person arising directly or indirectly from the use of the data, products and services.&rft_rights=Attribution: Format for citation of metadata sourced from Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) in a list of reference is as follows: Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS). (2024). Evaluating error sources to improve precision in the co-registration of underwater 3D models. https://apps.aims.gov.au/metadata/view/c46d1882-cb48-4412-b62b-992580b86c18, accessed[date-of-access].&rft_subject=oceans&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Other view details
Unknown

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Australia License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/au/

Use Limitation: All AIMS data, products and services are provided "as is" and AIMS does not warrant their fitness for a particular purpose or non-infringement. While AIMS has made every reasonable effort to ensure high quality of the data, products and services, to the extent permitted by law the data, products and services are provided without any warranties of any kind, either expressed or implied, including without limitation any implied warranties of title, merchantability, and fitness for a particular purpose or non-infringement. AIMS make no representation or warranty that the data, products and services are accurate, complete, reliable or current. To the extent permitted by law, AIMS exclude all liability to any person arising directly or indirectly from the use of the data, products and services.

Attribution: Format for citation of metadata sourced from Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) in a list of reference is as follows: "Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS). (2024). Evaluating error sources to improve precision in the co-registration of underwater 3D models. https://apps.aims.gov.au/metadata/view/c46d1882-cb48-4412-b62b-992580b86c18, accessed[date-of-access]".

Access:

Other

Full description

Change detection is an essential and widely used approach for investigating ecosystem dynamics. Multi-temporal 3D models increasingly underpin photogrammetry-based analyses of change for many ecologically relevant attributes. To detect change, it is necessary to accurately align 3D models collected at different times using a process referred to as co-registration. However, achieving precise co-registration is difficult in underwater habitats due to practical challenges intrinsic to surveying them. These include a lack of accurate georeferencing information, variable light, turbidity and weather conditions, and diving restrictions dictated by the diver's pressure exposure over time. Here we present an efficient co-registration workflow for 3D models that directly addresses these challenges, derived from underwater structure-from-motion methods. To test our approach, we used 3D models from across a wide range of coral reef habitats covering all those that one may encounter in shallow reefs (15m depth and above). We then identified and empirically estimated four key sources of error: co-registration, 3D processing, image acquisition, and reference and scaling features (RSF) placement, and quantified their relative contributions to the overall error. Our proposed co-registration workflow had a mean precision of 1.37±16.55mm. Image acquisition and RSF placement errors contributed the most to the total workflow error (37% and 53%, respectively), while the contribution of co-registration and 3D processing errors was minimal (3% and 7%, respectively). As a result of our analysis, we provide ‘good practice’ guidelines to reduce errors associated with photogrammetric workflows and to facilitate efficient and reliable detection of 3D change in complex underwater ecosystems.


This study was conducted as part of the Ecological Intelligence for Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program (EcoRRAP) (https://gbrrestoration.org/program/ecorrap/). Underwater imagery was collected using EcoRRAP 3D photogrammetry techniques described by Gordon et al. (2023).

Lineage

Maintenance and Update Frequency: notPlanned
Statement: 3D models are created from raw imagery collected using Nikon D850 DSLRs 3D models of the same sites were produced to evaluate the precision of the workflow

Notes

Credit
The Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program is funded by the partnership between the Australian Government’s Reef Trust and the Great Barrier Reef Foundation.
Credit
We acknowledge the traditional custodians of the Sea Country from which this data was collected from

Modified: 18 09 2026

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph
Subjects
oceans |

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Other Information
Lechene, M. A. A., Figueira, W. F., Murray, N. J., Aston, E. A., Gordon, S. E., & Ferrari, R. (2024). Evaluating error sources to improve precision in the co-registration of underwater 3D models. Ecological Informatics, 81, 102632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102632

doi : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102632

global : fe9659f1-12d6-4acf-ab89-67acdd37efe5

Identifiers
  • global : c46d1882-cb48-4412-b62b-992580b86c18
ACN 633 798 857