Data

Electric Circuits Concept Evaluation (ECCE) - Student Data

Queensland University of Technology
Cunningham-Nelson, Samuel
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.4225/09/5975485a2af62&rft.title=Electric Circuits Concept Evaluation (ECCE) - Student Data&rft.identifier=https://doi.org/10.4225/09/5975485a2af62&rft.publisher=Queensland University of Technology&rft.description=The data used in this discussion is responses from a concept inventory test, administered at the Queensland University of Technology. Concept Inventories are a form of assessment carefully crafted  to identify common misunderstandings or misconceptions in a key field. They are a set of multiple-choice questions given to students, designed to include the correct option, as well several distractors (Libarkin, 2008). The incorrect options, i.e. distractors, are designed to mimic common misconceptions of students. Ideally, this will lead to the identification, and hopefully rectification of these misconceptions. The concept inventory used here is the Electronic Circuits Concept Evaluation (ECCE) (Thornton & Sokoloff), which, as the name suggests, tests fundamental electrical circuit knowledge. Along with the included multiple choice questions, a short response component was added for students to explain how they came to choose a particular option. The data contained here is a selected subset of questions from the ECCE. Each column of data contains either written or multiple choice data relating to questions from this concept inventory. Each row is a student’s response to the test. File format is Excel (.xlsx) Excel is required to open this file. Various pieces of software were used to perform analysis on this data set (8 different pieces of software). Further details are included in the publication. &rft.creator=Cunningham-Nelson, Samuel &rft.date=2017&rft.edition=1&rft.relation=https://eprints.qut.edu.au/view/person/Cunningham-Nelson,_Sam.html&rft.coverage=153.028393,-27.477321&rft_rights=© Queensland University of Technology, 2017&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/&rft_subject=Concept Inventories&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Non-Commercial Licence view details
CC-BY-NC

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

© Queensland University of Technology, 2017

Access:

Other view details

Access to this data is open, for non-commercial use.

Contact Information

Postal Address:
Mr Samuel Cunningham-Nelson

[email protected]

Full description

The data used in this discussion is responses from a concept inventory test, administered at the Queensland University of Technology. Concept Inventories are a form of assessment carefully crafted  to identify common misunderstandings or misconceptions in a key field. They are a set of multiple-choice questions given to students, designed to include the correct option, as well several distractors (Libarkin, 2008). The incorrect options, i.e. distractors, are designed to mimic common misconceptions of students. Ideally, this will lead to the identification, and hopefully rectification of these misconceptions.

The concept inventory used here is the Electronic Circuits Concept Evaluation (ECCE) (Thornton & Sokoloff), which, as the name suggests, tests fundamental electrical circuit knowledge. Along with the included multiple choice questions, a short response component was added for students to explain how they came to choose a particular option.

  1. The data contained here is a selected subset of questions from the ECCE. Each column of data contains either written or multiple choice data relating to questions from this concept inventory. Each row is a student’s response to the test.
  2. File format is Excel (.xlsx)
  3. Excel is required to open this file.

Various pieces of software were used to perform analysis on this data set (8 different pieces of software). Further details are included in the publication.

Data time period: 27 07 2016 to 27 07 2016

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

153.02839,-27.47732

153.028393,-27.477321

Subjects

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers