Data

Diagrams, including sedimentation pattern and force-separation curves, from a study on the influence of hydrocarbon contamination on clay soil microstructure

Queensland University of Technology
Izdebska-Mucha, D ; Trzcinsk, J ; Zbik, M.S ; Frost, R.L
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.4225/09/5858c9df9b8f7&rft.title=Diagrams, including sedimentation pattern and force-separation curves, from a study on the influence of hydrocarbon contamination on clay soil microstructure&rft.identifier=10.4225/09/5858c9df9b8f7&rft.publisher=Queensland University of Technology&rft.description=Microstructural (fabric, forces and composition) changes due to hydrocarbon contamination in a clayey soil (glacial till) were studied using scanning electron microscopy (microfabric analysis), atomic force microscopy (force measurement) and a sedimentation bench test (particle size measurements). Non-polluted and polluted glacial till from NE Poland (in the area of a fuel terminal) were used for the study. Figure 1 is the sedimentation pattern for the soil in deionized water and diesel oil.  Figure 2 are images of fabric changes in NP (unpolluted, SEM micrographs A1, B1, C1) and P (polluted, SEM micrographs A2, B2, C2) clay soil. Magnification: A, 200×; B, 1600×; C, 6500×.  Figure 3 shows examples of orientation diagrams and average values of anisotropy coefficient (Kaav) for NP soil (a) and P soil (b); α, angle of structural elements orientation. Figure 4 is force–separation curves on approach (A series) and withdrawal (B series) for the interaction between platelets in the NP clay sample in water (A1, B1), in 0.01 m KCl (A2, B2) and in 0.1 m KCl (A3, B3). The solid lines in the force measurement on approach represent forces measured between the silica probe and the bare mica surface at the relevant KCl electrolyte concentration.  Figure 5 is Force–separation curves on approach (A series) and withdrawal (B series) for the interaction between platelets in the P clay sample in water (A1, B1), in 0.01 m KCl (A2, B2), and in 0.1 m KCl (A3, B3). The solid lines in the force measurement on approach represent forces measured between the silica probe and the bare mica surface at the relevant KCl electrolyte concentration. &rft.creator=Izdebska-Mucha, D &rft.creator=Trzcinsk, J &rft.creator=Zbik, M.S &rft.creator=Frost, R.L &rft.date=2015&rft.edition=1&rft.coverage=24.145893,54.835784 14.122864,54.835784 14.122864,49.002025 24.145893,49.002025 24.145893,54.835784&rft_rights=© 2011, The Mineralogical Society&rft_subject=soils&rft_subject=SEM data&rft_subject=soil pollution&rft_subject=till&rft_subject=pollution&rft_subject=Clay soils&rft_subject=Central Europe&rft_subject=Poland&rft_subject=petroleum products&rft_subject=sediments&rft_subject=ultrastructure&rft_subject=oil spills&rft_subject=clastic sediments&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

view details

© 2011, The Mineralogical Society

Access:

Other

Contact Information

Postal Address:
Emeritus Professor Ray Frost
Ph: +61 7 3138 2407

r.frost@qut.edu.au

Full description

Microstructural (fabric, forces and composition) changes due to hydrocarbon contamination in a clayey soil (glacial till) were studied using scanning electron microscopy (microfabric analysis), atomic force microscopy (force measurement) and a sedimentation bench test (particle size measurements). Non-polluted and polluted glacial till from NE Poland (in the area of a fuel terminal) were used for the study.

Figure 1 is the sedimentation pattern for the soil in deionized water and diesel oil.  Figure 2 are images of fabric changes in NP (unpolluted, SEM micrographs A1, B1, C1) and P (polluted, SEM micrographs A2, B2, C2) clay soil. Magnification: A, 200×; B, 1600×; C, 6500×.  Figure 3 shows examples of orientation diagrams and average values of anisotropy coefficient (Kaav) for NP soil (a) and P soil (b); α, angle of structural elements orientation. Figure 4 is force–separation curves on approach (A series) and withdrawal (B series) for the interaction between platelets in the NP clay sample in water (A1, B1), in 0.01 m KCl (A2, B2) and in 0.1 m KCl (A3, B3). The solid lines in the force measurement on approach represent forces measured between the silica probe and the bare mica surface at the relevant KCl electrolyte concentration.  Figure 5 is Force–separation curves on approach (A series) and withdrawal (B series) for the interaction between platelets in the P clay sample in water (A1, B1), in 0.01 m KCl (A2, B2), and in 0.1 m KCl (A3, B3). The solid lines in the force measurement on approach represent forces measured between the silica probe and the bare mica surface at the relevant KCl electrolyte concentration.

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

24.14589,54.83578 14.12286,54.83578 14.12286,49.00203 24.14589,49.00203 24.14589,54.83578

19.1343785,51.9189045

Subjects

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers