Data

Data from: Effectiveness of camera traps for quantifying daytime and nighttime visitation by vertebrate pollinators

The University of Western Australia
Krauss, Siegfried L. ; Roberts, Dave ; Phillips, Ryan D. ; Edwards, Caroline
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.5061/dryad.tj7pp1b&rft.title=Data from: Effectiveness of camera traps for quantifying daytime and nighttime visitation by vertebrate pollinators&rft.identifier=10.5061/dryad.tj7pp1b&rft.publisher=DRYAD&rft.description=1. Identification of pollen vectors is a fundamental objective of pollination biology. The foraging and social behavior of these pollinators has profound effects on plant mating, making quantification of their behaviour critical for understanding the ecological and evolutionary consequences of different pollinators for the plants they visit. However, accurate quantification of visitation may be problematic, especially for shy animals and/or when the temporal and spatial scale of observation desired is large. Sophisticated heat- and movement-triggered motion-sensor cameras (‘camera trapping’) provide new, underutilized tools to address these challenges. However, to date there has been no rigorous evaluation of the sampling considerations needed for using camera trapping in pollination research. 2. We measured the effectiveness of camera trapping for identifying vertebrate visitors and quantifying their visitation rates and foraging behaviour on Banksia menziesii (Proteaceae). Multiple still cameras (Reconyx HC 500) and a video camera (Little Acorn LTL5210A) were deployed. 3. From 2,753 recorded visits by vertebrates, we identified five species of nectarivorous honeyeater (Meliphagidae) and the honey possum (Tarsipedidae), with significant variation in the species composition of visitors among inflorescences. Species of floral visitor showed significant variation in their time of peak activity, duration of visits, and numbers of flowers probed per visit. Where multiple cameras were deployed on individual inflorescences, effectiveness of individual still cameras varied from 15% to 86% of all recorded visits. Methodological issues and solutions, and the future uses of camera traps in pollination biology, are discussed. 4. Conclusions and wider implications: Motion-triggered cameras are promising tools for the quantification of vertebrate visitation and some aspects of behaviour on flowers. However, researchers need to be mindful of the variation in effectiveness of individual camera traps in detecting animals. Pollinator studies using camera traps are in their infancy, and the full potential of this developing technology is yet to be realized.,Camera_trapping_data for graphs_FINALSummary data for figures,&rft.creator=Krauss, Siegfried L. &rft.creator=Roberts, Dave &rft.creator=Phillips, Ryan D. &rft.creator=Edwards, Caroline &rft.date=2019&rft.relation=http://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/bc9ff91c-c088-449b-8eed-23317a552714&rft_subject=Anthochaera carunculata&rft_subject=pollination&rft_subject=Banksia menziesii&rft_subject=Acanthorhynchus superciliosus&rft_subject=Lichenostomus virescens&rft_subject=camera trapping&rft_subject=Remote sensing&rft_subject=pollination syndrome&rft_subject=Anthochaera lunulata&rft_subject=Banksia&rft_subject=vertebrates&rft_subject=current&rft_subject=Tarsipes rostratus&rft_subject=honey possum&rft_subject=plant mating&rft_subject=Holocene&rft_subject=honeyeaters&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Access:

Open

Full description

1. Identification of pollen vectors is a fundamental objective of pollination biology. The foraging and social behavior of these pollinators has profound effects on plant mating, making quantification of their behaviour critical for understanding the ecological and evolutionary consequences of different pollinators for the plants they visit. However, accurate quantification of visitation may be problematic, especially for shy animals and/or when the temporal and spatial scale of observation desired is large. Sophisticated heat- and movement-triggered motion-sensor cameras (‘camera trapping’) provide new, underutilized tools to address these challenges. However, to date there has been no rigorous evaluation of the sampling considerations needed for using camera trapping in pollination research. 2. We measured the effectiveness of camera trapping for identifying vertebrate visitors and quantifying their visitation rates and foraging behaviour on Banksia menziesii (Proteaceae). Multiple still cameras (Reconyx HC 500) and a video camera (Little Acorn LTL5210A) were deployed. 3. From 2,753 recorded visits by vertebrates, we identified five species of nectarivorous honeyeater (Meliphagidae) and the honey possum (Tarsipedidae), with significant variation in the species composition of visitors among inflorescences. Species of floral visitor showed significant variation in their time of peak activity, duration of visits, and numbers of flowers probed per visit. Where multiple cameras were deployed on individual inflorescences, effectiveness of individual still cameras varied from 15% to 86% of all recorded visits. Methodological issues and solutions, and the future uses of camera traps in pollination biology, are discussed. 4. Conclusions and wider implications: Motion-triggered cameras are promising tools for the quantification of vertebrate visitation and some aspects of behaviour on flowers. However, researchers need to be mindful of the variation in effectiveness of individual camera traps in detecting animals. Pollinator studies using camera traps are in their infancy, and the full potential of this developing technology is yet to be realized.,Camera_trapping_data for graphs_FINALSummary data for figures,

Notes

External Organisations
La Trobe University; Australian National University; Oberlin College
Associated Persons
Dave Roberts (Creator); Ryan D. Phillips (Creator)Caroline Edwards (Creator)

Issued: 2019-07-05

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph
Identifiers