Data

An assessment workflow to recover microplastics from complex biological matrices

Australian Institute of Marine Science
Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS)
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=https://apps.aims.gov.au/metadata/view/db211d0a-1e8b-4aa1-bc07-adff5a564e08&rft.title=An assessment workflow to recover microplastics from complex biological matrices&rft.identifier=https://apps.aims.gov.au/metadata/view/db211d0a-1e8b-4aa1-bc07-adff5a564e08&rft.publisher=Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS)&rft.description=This published study developed a criteria-guided workflow to assess the effectiveness of microplastic separation methods on complex marine biological matrices. More specifically, the use of four microplastic separation methods commonly applied in the literature (nitric acid, HNO3, and potassium hydroxide, KOH, digestions, and sodium chloride, NaCl, and potassium iodide, KI, density flotations) were evaluated on four abundant marine taxa (hard coral, sponge, sea squirt, sea cucumber) using five environmentally relevant microplastics (fragments of polyethylene, polystyrene, polyethylene terephthalate, and polyvinylchloride, as well as rayon fibres). Methods were deemed efficient when (1) rates of sample clarification were appropriate, (2) effects on physical and chemical characteristics of microplastics were negligible, and (3) recovery rates of spiked microplastics into sample matrices were high. Specimens of Acropora millepora (hard coral), Rhopaloeides odorabile (sponge), Polycarpa aurata (sea squirt), and Holothuria atra (sea cucumber) were opportunistically collected from five reefs in the central Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (Rib Reef, Taylor Reef, Feather Reef, John Brewer Reef, Farquharson Reef) in 2017 and 2019. Irregular microplastic fragments and fibres were produced in the laboratory at the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS), in Townsville (Queensland, Australia). This work was primarly conducted through controlled laboratory experiments at AIMS. Microplastic sizes were statistically analysed using general linear model in R. All other parametres assessed were not statistically analysed.Maintenance and Update Frequency: notPlannedStatement: Data quality was assured using the following permits, publications, and SOPs: 1. Study species were collected following the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority permit G12/35236.1 2. Sample processing was conducted following the SOPs: SOP_SF_T070_2, SOP_SF_T072_1, and SOP_SF_T0565_1 (AIMS internal documents) 3. Microplastics tested were physically and chemically characterized following the proposed charts in the publication, as well as descriptors previously used in the literature (e.g., Norén, 2007, Hidalgo-Ruz et al., 2012, Kroon et al. 2018a,b, Hartmann et al., 2019, Rochman et al., 2019, and Miller et al., 2021), and the SOPs SF-T075_1, SF-T076_1, and BAF-I078_5 (AIMS internal documents). References: Hartmann, N.B., Huffer, T., Thompson, R.C., Hassellov, M., Verschoor, A., Daugaard, A.E., Rist, S., Karlsson, T., Brennholt, N., Cole, M., Herrling, M.P., Hess, M.C., Ivleva, N.P., Lusher, A.L., Wagner, M., 2019. Are We Speaking the Same Language? Recommendations for a Definition and Categorization Framework for Plastic Debris. Environ Sci Technol 53, 1039-1047. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05297 Hidalgo-Ruz, V., Gutow, L., Thompson, R. C., and Thiel, M. (2012). Microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the methods used for identification and quantification. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 3060–3075. doi: 10.1021/es2031505 Kroon, F., Motti, C., Talbot, S., Sobral, P., and Puotinen, M. (2018). A workflow for improving estimates of microplastic contamination in marine waters: a case study from North-Western Australia. Environ. Pollut. 238, 26–38. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.010 Kroon, F. J., Motti, C. E., Jensen, L. H., and Berry, K. L. E. (2018). Classification of marine microdebris: a review and case study on fish from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Sci. Rep. 8:16422. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34590-6 Miller, M.E., Motti, C.A., Menendez, P., Kroon, F.J., 2021. Efficacy of Microplastic Separation Techniques on Seawater Samples: Testing Accuracy Using High-Density Polyethylene. Biol Bull 240, 52-66. doi: 10.1086/71075552 Norén, F. (2007). Small plastic particles in Coastal Swedish waters. KIMO Sweden 11, 1–11. Rochman, C.M., Brookson, C., Bikker, J., Djuric, N., Earn, A., Bucci, K., Athey, S., Huntington, A., McIlwraith, H., Munno, K., Frond, H.D., Kolomijeca, A., Erdle, L., Grbic, J., Bayoumi, M., Borrelle, S.B., Wu, T., Santoro, S., Werbowski, L.M., Zhu, X., Giles, R.K., Hamilton, B.M., Thaysen, C., Kaura, A., Klasios, N., Ead, L., Kim, J., Sherlock, C., Ho, A., Hunga, C., 2019. Rethinking Microplastics as a Diverse Contaminant Suite. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 38, 703-711. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4371&rft.creator=Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) &rft.date=2026&rft.coverage=westlimit=146.55040754605508; southlimit=-17.823549746062405; eastlimit=146.55040754605508; northlimit=-17.823549746062405&rft.coverage=westlimit=146.55040754605508; southlimit=-17.823549746062405; eastlimit=146.55040754605508; northlimit=-17.823549746062405&rft.coverage=westlimit=146.51298550226645; southlimit=-17.780401050509; eastlimit=146.51298550226645; northlimit=-17.780401050509&rft.coverage=westlimit=146.51298550226645; southlimit=-17.780401050509; eastlimit=146.51298550226645; northlimit=-17.780401050509&rft.coverage=westlimit=147.05544118169743; southlimit=-18.61989363952476; eastlimit=147.05544118169743; northlimit=-18.61989363952476&rft.coverage=westlimit=147.05544118169743; southlimit=-18.61989363952476; eastlimit=147.05544118169743; northlimit=-18.61989363952476&rft.coverage=westlimit=146.87381744384768; southlimit=-18.473422167288476; eastlimit=146.87381744384768; northlimit=-18.473422167288476&rft.coverage=westlimit=146.87381744384768; southlimit=-18.473422167288476; eastlimit=146.87381744384768; northlimit=-18.473422167288476&rft.coverage=westlimit=146.373609975598; southlimit=-17.515070161732556; eastlimit=146.373609975598; northlimit=-17.515070161732556&rft.coverage=westlimit=146.373609975598; southlimit=-17.515070161732556; eastlimit=146.373609975598; northlimit=-17.515070161732556&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/&rft_rights=Use Limitation: All AIMS data, products and services are provided as is and AIMS does not warrant their fitness for a particular purpose or non-infringement. While AIMS has made every reasonable effort to ensure high quality of the data, products and services, to the extent permitted by law the data, products and services are provided without any warranties of any kind, either expressed or implied, including without limitation any implied warranties of title, merchantability, and fitness for a particular purpose or non-infringement. AIMS make no representation or warranty that the data, products and services are accurate, complete, reliable or current. To the extent permitted by law, AIMS exclude all liability to any person arising directly or indirectly from the use of the data, products and services.&rft_rights=Attribution: Format for citation of metadata sourced from Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) in a list of reference is as follows: Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS). (2022). An assessment workflow to recover microplastics from complex biological matrices. https://apps.aims.gov.au/metadata/view/db211d0a-1e8b-4aa1-bc07-adff5a564e08, accessed[date-of-access].&rft_subject=oceans&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/

Use Limitation: All AIMS data, products and services are provided "as is" and AIMS does not warrant their fitness for a particular purpose or non-infringement. While AIMS has made every reasonable effort to ensure high quality of the data, products and services, to the extent permitted by law the data, products and services are provided without any warranties of any kind, either expressed or implied, including without limitation any implied warranties of title, merchantability, and fitness for a particular purpose or non-infringement. AIMS make no representation or warranty that the data, products and services are accurate, complete, reliable or current. To the extent permitted by law, AIMS exclude all liability to any person arising directly or indirectly from the use of the data, products and services.

Attribution: Format for citation of metadata sourced from Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) in a list of reference is as follows: "Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS). (2022). An assessment workflow to recover microplastics from complex biological matrices. https://apps.aims.gov.au/metadata/view/db211d0a-1e8b-4aa1-bc07-adff5a564e08, accessed[date-of-access]".

Access:

Other

Full description

This published study developed a criteria-guided workflow to assess the effectiveness of microplastic separation methods on complex marine biological matrices. More specifically, the use of four microplastic separation methods commonly applied in the literature (nitric acid, HNO3, and potassium hydroxide, KOH, digestions, and sodium chloride, NaCl, and potassium iodide, KI, density flotations) were evaluated on four abundant marine taxa (hard coral, sponge, sea squirt, sea cucumber) using five environmentally relevant microplastics (fragments of polyethylene, polystyrene, polyethylene terephthalate, and polyvinylchloride, as well as rayon fibres). Methods were deemed efficient when (1) rates of sample clarification were appropriate, (2) effects on physical and chemical characteristics of microplastics were negligible, and (3) recovery rates of spiked microplastics into sample matrices were high. Specimens of Acropora millepora (hard coral), Rhopaloeides odorabile (sponge), Polycarpa aurata (sea squirt), and Holothuria atra (sea cucumber) were opportunistically collected from five reefs in the central Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (Rib Reef, Taylor Reef, Feather Reef, John Brewer Reef, Farquharson Reef) in 2017 and 2019. Irregular microplastic fragments and fibres were produced in the laboratory at the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS), in Townsville (Queensland, Australia). This work was primarly conducted through controlled laboratory experiments at AIMS. Microplastic sizes were statistically analysed using general linear model in R. All other parametres assessed were not statistically analysed.

Lineage

Maintenance and Update Frequency: notPlanned
Statement: Data quality was assured using the following permits, publications, and SOPs: 1. Study species were collected following the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority permit G12/35236.1 2. Sample processing was conducted following the SOPs: SOP_SF_T070_2, SOP_SF_T072_1, and SOP_SF_T0565_1 (AIMS internal documents) 3. Microplastics tested were physically and chemically characterized following the proposed charts in the publication, as well as descriptors previously used in the literature (e.g., Norén, 2007, Hidalgo-Ruz et al., 2012, Kroon et al. 2018a,b, Hartmann et al., 2019, Rochman et al., 2019, and Miller et al., 2021), and the SOPs SF-T075_1, SF-T076_1, and BAF-I078_5 (AIMS internal documents). References: Hartmann, N.B., Huffer, T., Thompson, R.C., Hassellov, M., Verschoor, A., Daugaard, A.E., Rist, S., Karlsson, T., Brennholt, N., Cole, M., Herrling, M.P., Hess, M.C., Ivleva, N.P., Lusher, A.L., Wagner, M., 2019. Are We Speaking the Same Language? Recommendations for a Definition and Categorization Framework for Plastic Debris. Environ Sci Technol 53, 1039-1047. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05297 Hidalgo-Ruz, V., Gutow, L., Thompson, R. C., and Thiel, M. (2012). Microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the methods used for identification and quantification. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 3060–3075. doi: 10.1021/es2031505 Kroon, F., Motti, C., Talbot, S., Sobral, P., and Puotinen, M. (2018). A workflow for improving estimates of microplastic contamination in marine waters: a case study from North-Western Australia. Environ. Pollut. 238, 26–38. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.010 Kroon, F. J., Motti, C. E., Jensen, L. H., and Berry, K. L. E. (2018). Classification of marine microdebris: a review and case study on fish from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Sci. Rep. 8:16422. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34590-6 Miller, M.E., Motti, C.A., Menendez, P., Kroon, F.J., 2021. Efficacy of Microplastic Separation Techniques on Seawater Samples: Testing Accuracy Using High-Density Polyethylene. Biol Bull 240, 52-66. doi: 10.1086/71075552 Norén, F. (2007). Small plastic particles in Coastal Swedish waters. KIMO Sweden 11, 1–11. Rochman, C.M., Brookson, C., Bikker, J., Djuric, N., Earn, A., Bucci, K., Athey, S., Huntington, A., McIlwraith, H., Munno, K., Frond, H.D., Kolomijeca, A., Erdle, L., Grbic, J., Bayoumi, M., Borrelle, S.B., Wu, T., Santoro, S., Werbowski, L.M., Zhu, X., Giles, R.K., Hamilton, B.M., Thaysen, C., Kaura, A., Klasios, N., Ead, L., Kim, J., Sherlock, C., Ho, A., Hunga, C., 2019. Rethinking Microplastics as a Diverse Contaminant Suite. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 38, 703-711. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4371

Notes

Credit
Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS)
Credit
TWQ Hub Ph.D. research funding, National Environmental Science Program Tropical Water Quality Hub (TWQ Hub), Australia.
Credit
AIMS@JCU Ph.D. scholarship, Australian Institute of Marine Science and James Cook University, Australia.

Modified: 11 09 2026

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

146.55041,-17.82355

146.55040754606,-17.823549746062

146.51299,-17.7804

146.51298550227,-17.780401050509

147.05544,-18.61989

147.0554411817,-18.619893639525

146.87382,-18.47342

146.87381744385,-18.473422167288

146.37361,-17.51507

146.3736099756,-17.515070161733

text: westlimit=146.55040754605508; southlimit=-17.823549746062405; eastlimit=146.55040754605508; northlimit=-17.823549746062405

text: westlimit=146.51298550226645; southlimit=-17.780401050509; eastlimit=146.51298550226645; northlimit=-17.780401050509

text: westlimit=147.05544118169743; southlimit=-18.61989363952476; eastlimit=147.05544118169743; northlimit=-18.61989363952476

text: westlimit=146.87381744384768; southlimit=-18.473422167288476; eastlimit=146.87381744384768; northlimit=-18.473422167288476

text: westlimit=146.373609975598; southlimit=-17.515070161732556; eastlimit=146.373609975598; northlimit=-17.515070161732556

Subjects
oceans |

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Other Information
Santana, M. F. M., Kroon, F. J., van Herwerden, L., Vamvounis, G. & Motti, C. A.(2022). An assessment workflow to recover microplastics from complex biological matrices. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 179, 113676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113676

url : https://api.aims.gov.au/data-v2.0/db211d0a-1e8b-4aa1-bc07-adff5a564e08/files/Santana etal 2022_Methods_Workflow.pdf

Identifiers
  • global : db211d0a-1e8b-4aa1-bc07-adff5a564e08
ACN 633 798 857