Data

Warra Tall Eucalypt Relative Vascular Plant Cover Data

Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
Wardlaw, Tim
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25901/r977-em54&rft.title=Warra Tall Eucalypt Relative Vascular Plant Cover Data&rft.identifier=10.25901/r977-em54&rft.publisher=Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network&rft.description=This data contains relative species cover of vascular plants in plots of either mature tall, wet eucalypt forest or of 25-50 year-old silvicultural regeneration following clearfell harvesting in the Warra Tall Eucalypt site between 2010 - 2011Selection of sample plots: The three-scale consistent LDI map of the SFEFL was overlain with the mapped extent of two forest age-classes: (i) mature eucalypt forest > 110 years old and never harvested; and (ii) older (25–50 years-old) wet eucalypt forest that had been silviculturally regenerated after clearfell harvesting. Patches of these age-classes coinciding with pixels that were three-scale consistent for LDI class were identified. All locations of scale-consistent patches of mature eucalypt forest and older silvicultural regeneration were prioritised for field validation according to the following criteria:i. Low altitude (below 600 m); ii. Forest dominated by Eucalyptus obliqua, Eucalyptus regnans , or a mixture of these species; iii. At least 75 m from a road, vehicle track, or edge of a strongly contrasting vegetation type; and iv. Forest patch of an age-class was at least 150 m wide at a point where a plot could be located. The final experimental design comprised seven replicate 50 x 50 m square plots of mature eucalypt forest (MAT plots) at each of four LDI classes (4–7), and seven replicate plots of older silvicultural regeneration (SILV plots) at each of four LDI classes (5–8). Mature forest within highly disturbed areas with LDI class 8 was rare, as was older silvicultural regeneration within relatively undisturbed areas with LDI class 4, so these combinations were not sampled. Calculation of landscape disturbance intensity: A vegetation map of the SFEFL representing the 2009 distribution of nine broad vegetation classes was produced at 1:20,000 scale from forest-types interpreted from aerial photography acquired in the 2000s (Forestry Tasmania, Forest Class 2005 mapping), and converted to 50 m pixel raster format using the open-source GIS software SAGA©. Each vegetation class was assigned a disturbance rating between 1 (least disturbed) for rainforest and 10 (most disturbed) for agricultural land, and each pixel was assigned the disturbance rating corresponding to its vegetation class. Using a moving-window algorithm, the Landscape Disturbance Index (LDI) for each pixel was then calculated by averaging the disturbance rating of all pixels within a given radius of that pixel. Separate LDIs were calculated for radii of 500 m, 1 km and 2 km, to give separate LDI values for each pixel at these three landscape-scales. All LDI values were rounded down to the nearest integer and the raster maps of integer LDIs at each of the three spatial scales were overlaid to identify pixels with the same integer LDI at each of the three spatial scales to produce a “three-scale-consistent LDI” map of the SFEFL.Vascular plant surveys: Six 10 x 10 m subplots were selected within each of the 56 plots for detailed floristic assessment using a method of non-replacement random sampling subject to two conditions: (i) subplots were excluded if they shared a 10-m boundary with a previously selected subplot; and (ii) at least two 10 x 10 m corner regions were sampled. Plot percentage foliage cover (PFC) for each observed species was estimated as the mean PFC of all six subplots at 14 plots, of five of the six subplots at 38 plots, and of four of the six subplots in the remaining four plots. A presence/absence species list was recorded in the subplots where PFC was not estimated, and species that were in presence/absence subplots but not in any of the PFC subplots were assigned a plot cover of 0.5% (the minimum cover score typical of infrequently occurring species). Relative cover was calculated for each species as the PFC of the species as a proportion of the total PFC of all species.Progress Code: completedMaintenance and Update Frequency: notPlanned&rft.creator=Wardlaw, Tim &rft.date=2024&rft.edition=1.0&rft.coverage=The Warra Tall Eucalypt site is approximately 60 km west south-west of Hobart, Tasmania. It lies partly within the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area.&rft.coverage=northlimit=-43.095487; southlimit=-43.095939; westlimit=146.653414; eastLimit=146.654031; projection=EPSG:4326&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0&rft_rights=TERN services are provided on an as-is and as available basis. Users use any TERN services at their discretion and risk. They will be solely responsible for any damage or loss whatsoever that results from such use including use of any data obtained through TERN and any analysis performed using the TERN infrastructure. <br />Web links to and from external, third party websites should not be construed as implying any relationships with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by TERN. <br /><br />Please advise any work or publications that use this data via the online form at https://www.tern.org.au/research-publications/#reporting&rft_rights=Please cite this dataset as {Author} ({PublicationYear}). {Title}. {Version, as appropriate}. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. Dataset. {Identifier}.&rft_rights=Please note: This data has been migrated “as is” from TERN’s SuperSite data portal. Minimal quality assessment has been applied to this data. Please contact the dataset authors for queries regarding the data&rft_subject=biota&rft_subject=environment&rft_subject=DISTURBANCE&rft_subject=FORESTS&rft_subject=EARTH SCIENCE&rft_subject=BIOSPHERE&rft_subject=TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS&rft_subject=AFFORESTATION/REFORESTATION&rft_subject=FOREST MANAGEMENT&rft_subject=AGRICULTURE&rft_subject=FOREST SCIENCE&rft_subject=FOREST COMPOSITION/VEGETATION STRUCTURE&rft_subject=VEGETATION&rft_subject=Landscape Ecology&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS&rft_subject=Terrestrial Ecology&rft_subject=BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=ECOLOGY&rft_subject=Community ecology (excl. invasive species ecology)&rft_subject=Warra Tall Eucalypt&rft_subject=scientific name (Unitless)&rft_subject=Unitless&rft_subject=species cover (Percent)&rft_subject=Percent&rft_subject=500 meters - < 1 km&rft_subject=one off&rft_subject=Warra&rft_subject=Southern Forests Experimental Forest Landscape&rft_subject=Vascular plants&rft_subject=Forest management&rft_subject=Disturbance&rft_subject=Mature forest&rft_subject=Eucalypt obliqua&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

TERN services are provided on an "as-is" and "as available" basis. Users use any TERN services at their discretion and risk. They will be solely responsible for any damage or loss whatsoever that results from such use including use of any data obtained through TERN and any analysis performed using the TERN infrastructure.
Web links to and from external, third party websites should not be construed as implying any relationships with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by TERN.

Please advise any work or publications that use this data via the online form at https://www.tern.org.au/research-publications/#reporting

Please cite this dataset as {Author} ({PublicationYear}). {Title}. {Version, as appropriate}. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. Dataset. {Identifier}.

Please note: This data has been migrated “as is” from TERN’s SuperSite data portal. Minimal quality assessment has been applied to this data. Please contact the dataset authors for queries regarding the data

Access:

Open view details

unclassified

Contact Information

Street Address:
Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
Building 1019, 80 Meiers Rd
QLD 4068
Australia
Ph: +61 7 3365 9097

esupport@tern.org.au

Brief description

This data contains relative species cover of vascular plants in plots of either mature tall, wet eucalypt forest or of 25-50 year-old silvicultural regeneration following clearfell harvesting in the Warra Tall Eucalypt site between 2010 - 2011

Lineage

Selection of sample plots:
The three-scale consistent LDI map of the SFEFL was overlain with the mapped extent of two forest age-classes: (i) mature eucalypt forest > 110 years old and never harvested; and (ii) older (25–50 years-old) wet eucalypt forest that had been silviculturally regenerated after clearfell harvesting. Patches of these age-classes coinciding with pixels that were three-scale consistent for LDI class were identified. All locations of scale-consistent patches of mature eucalypt forest and older silvicultural regeneration were prioritised for field validation according to the following criteria:i. Low altitude (below 600 m); ii. Forest dominated by Eucalyptus obliqua, Eucalyptus regnans , or a mixture of these species; iii. At least 75 m from a road, vehicle track, or edge of a strongly contrasting vegetation type; and iv. Forest patch of an age-class was at least 150 m wide at a point where a plot could be located. The final experimental design comprised seven replicate 50 x 50 m square plots of mature eucalypt forest (MAT plots) at each of four LDI classes (4–7), and seven replicate plots of older silvicultural regeneration (SILV plots) at each of four LDI classes (5–8). Mature forest within highly disturbed areas with LDI class 8 was rare, as was older silvicultural regeneration within relatively undisturbed areas with LDI class 4, so these combinations were not sampled.
Calculation of landscape disturbance intensity:
A vegetation map of the SFEFL representing the 2009 distribution of nine broad vegetation classes was produced at 1:20,000 scale from forest-types interpreted from aerial photography acquired in the 2000s (Forestry Tasmania, Forest Class 2005 mapping), and converted to 50 m pixel raster format using the open-source GIS software SAGA©. Each vegetation class was assigned a disturbance rating between 1 (least disturbed) for rainforest and 10 (most disturbed) for agricultural land, and each pixel was assigned the disturbance rating corresponding to its vegetation class. Using a moving-window algorithm, the Landscape Disturbance Index (LDI) for each pixel was then calculated by averaging the disturbance rating of all pixels within a given radius of that pixel. Separate LDIs were calculated for radii of 500 m, 1 km and 2 km, to give separate LDI values for each pixel at these three landscape-scales. All LDI values were rounded down to the nearest integer and the raster maps of integer LDIs at each of the three spatial scales were overlaid to identify pixels with the same integer LDI at each of the three spatial scales to produce a “three-scale-consistent LDI” map of the SFEFL.
Vascular plant surveys:
Six 10 x 10 m subplots were selected within each of the 56 plots for detailed floristic assessment using a method of non-replacement random sampling subject to two conditions: (i) subplots were excluded if they shared a 10-m boundary with a previously selected subplot; and (ii) at least two 10 x 10 m corner regions were sampled. Plot percentage foliage cover (PFC) for each observed species was estimated as the mean PFC of all six subplots at 14 plots, of five of the six subplots at 38 plots, and of four of the six subplots in the remaining four plots. A presence/absence species list was recorded in the subplots where PFC was not estimated, and species that were in presence/absence subplots but not in any of the PFC subplots were assigned a plot cover of 0.5% (the minimum cover score typical of infrequently occurring species). Relative cover was calculated for each species as the PFC of the species as a proportion of the total PFC of all species.

Progress Code: completed
Maintenance and Update Frequency: notPlanned

Notes

Credit
We at TERN acknowledge the Traditional Owners and Custodians throughout Australia, New Zealand and all nations. We honour their profound connections to land, water, biodiversity and culture and pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging.
Purpose
The dataset was collected as part of a broader study examining the responses of bird, plant and beetle species to the intensity of disturbance in the landscape. The study tested the null hypotheses that species persisting in patches of mature forest or recolonising patches of silvicultural regeneration would be insensitive to the intensity of disturbance in the surrounding landscape.

Created: 2010-01-01

Issued: 2024-05-23

Modified: 2024-05-23

Data time period: 2010-01-01 to 2011-12-31

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

146.65403,-43.09549 146.65403,-43.09594 146.65341,-43.09594 146.65341,-43.09549 146.65403,-43.09549

146.6537225,-43.095713

text: The Warra Tall Eucalypt site is approximately 60 km west south-west of Hobart, Tasmania. It lies partly within the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area.