Data

WAMSI Node 3.2.2 - Ecosystem impacts of human usage and the effectiveness of zoning for biodiversity conservation. Trophic effects through herbivory at Ningaloo

Australian Ocean Data Network
CSIRO O&A, Information & Data Centre (Point of contact) CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere - Hobart (Associated with)
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=https://marlin.csiro.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/bc1b3741-e7e8-5039-e044-00144f7bc0f4&rft.title=WAMSI Node 3.2.2 - Ecosystem impacts of human usage and the effectiveness of zoning for biodiversity conservation. Trophic effects through herbivory at Ningaloo&rft.identifier=Anzlic Identifier: ANZCW0306008773&rft.publisher=Australian Ocean Data Network&rft.description=We used a range of approaches to gain an understanding of spatial and species-related patterns in herbivory in five distinct studies. Using underwater video cameras and Sargassum myriocystum assays, 23 different fish species were observed consuming macroalgae, but seven species (Naso unicornis, Kyphosus sp., K. vaigiensis, Siganus doliatus, Scarus ghobban, S. schlegeli and initial-phase Scarus sp.) together accounted for 95% of the observed bites across five regions. Of these species, three were identified as the most important in consuming macroalgae: N. unicornis, Kyphosus sp. and K. vaigiensis. These results were supported by stable isotope analyses that incorporate nutrients from food sources over far longer periods than those examined using the assay approach. We quantified spatial patterns of macroalgal consumption and food sources across a range of scales. Firstly, across reef habitats separated by hundreds of meters, herbivory was always greatest in the structurally complex coral-dominated outer reef and reef flat habitats, which are also characterised by the highest biomass of herbivorous fish. Secondly, we showed a high degree of variability in grazing rates among regions separated by 100s km in the marine park, with different species responsible for macroalgal removal among those regions. Either N. unicornis or Kyphosus spp. were responsible for the majority of the grazing. Thirdly, we showed variability in the importance of different food sources across both habitats and regions for some consumers (e.g. Siganus spp.) but consistency for other species (e.g. Naso unicornis, Kyphosus spp.), which is likely to reflect shifts in food source availability or feeding preferences. Lastly, we found strong transcontinental differences between Keppel Islands in the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) on the east coast of Australia and Ningaloo Reef in both the diversity of the species observed feeding and on the species composition of the roving herbivorous fish community. In Ningaloo Reef, 23 species were observed biting on Sargassum, compared with just 8 in the Keppel Islands. Sargassum consumption in the Keppel Islands was dominated by a small number of species and supports the identification of Naso unicornis as a key browser species. The larger number of species feeding on macroalgae in Ningaloo Reef suggests that there may be higher functional redundancy among macroalgal consumers in this system. We also characterised the benthic community dynamics of the reef-flat and lagoon habitats to identify seasonal patterns and we experimentally determined the importance of herbivory on algae recruitment in these two habitats. Differences among habitats in algal biomass were strongly influenced by season. Lagoon habitats only had higher biomass than reef-flat habitats during part of the year (late summer/ early autumn). Herbivory had an equally strong effect on the community composition of algal recruits in the lagoon and reef flat habitats, despite the reef flat hosting a herbivorous fish community that was an order of magnitude greater in terms of biomass than the lagoon, which is characterised by younger and smaller fish (e.g. Scarus initial phase).Progress Code: completedMaintenance and Update Frequency: asNeededStatement: Data collection, recording, database entry and quality control is the reponsibility of project staff, See WAMSI Node 3.2.2 - Trophic effects through herbivory at Ningaloo final report.&rft.creator=Anonymous&rft.date=2011&rft.coverage=westlimit=112.5; southlimit=-25; eastlimit=116; northlimit=-21&rft.coverage=westlimit=112.5; southlimit=-25; eastlimit=116; northlimit=-21&rft_rights=&rft_rights=Data is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Data is supplied 'as is' without any warranty or guarantee except as required by law to be given to you. The data may not be free of error, comprehensive, current or appropriate for your particular purpose. You accept all risk and responsibility for its use. ATTRIBUTION STATEMENT: The dataset [Insert-dataset-name-here] downloaded on [Insert-DD-Mmm-YYYY-here] was provided by CSIRO.&rft_subject=oceans&rft_subject=Earth Science | Biological Classification | Animals/Invertebrates&rft_subject=Earth Science | Biological Classification | Animals/Invertebrates | Arthropods | Crustaceans | Decapods&rft_subject=Earth Science | Biological Classification | Animals/Vertebrates | Fish&rft_subject=Earth Science | Biological Classification | Animals/Vertebrates | Mammals&rft_subject=Earth Science | Biological Classification | Animals/Vertebrates | Reptiles&rft_subject=Earth Science | Biological Classification | Animals/Vertebrates | Reptiles | Turtles&rft_subject=Earth Science | Biological Classification | Plants&rft_subject=Earth Science | Biosphere | Aquatic Ecosystems | Benthic Habitat&rft_subject=Earth Science | Biosphere | Aquatic Ecosystems | Coastal Habitat&rft_subject=Earth Science | Biosphere | Aquatic Ecosystems | Marine Habitat&rft_subject=Earth Science | Biosphere | Aquatic Ecosystems | Reef Habitat&rft_subject=Earth Science | Biosphere | Ecological Dynamics | Ecosystem Functions | Food-Web Dynamics&rft_subject=Earth Science | Biosphere | Ecological Dynamics | Ecosystem Functions | Nutrient Cycling&rft_subject=Earth Science | Biosphere | Ecological Dynamics | Ecosystem Functions | Primary Production&rft_subject=Earth Science | Biosphere | Vegetation | Biomass&rft_subject=Earth Science | Biosphere | Vegetation | Dominant Species&rft_subject=Coastal Waters (Australia) | West Australia Coast West, WA&rft_subject=Global / Oceans | Indian Ocean&rft_subject=WAMSI Node 3 Project 2: Ecosystem and Fisheries Effects of Zoning&rft_subject=Western Australian Marine Science Institute&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data
Cite Saved to MyRDA Save to MyRDA

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

Data is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Data is supplied 'as is' without any warranty or guarantee except as required by law to be given to you. The data may not be free of error, comprehensive, current or appropriate for your particular purpose. You accept all risk and responsibility for its use. ATTRIBUTION STATEMENT: The dataset [Insert-dataset-name-here] downloaded on [Insert-DD-Mmm-YYYY-here] was provided by CSIRO.

Access:

Other

Full description

We used a range of approaches to gain an understanding of spatial and species-related patterns in herbivory in five distinct studies. Using underwater video cameras and Sargassum myriocystum assays, 23 different fish species were observed consuming macroalgae, but seven species (Naso unicornis, Kyphosus sp., K. vaigiensis, Siganus doliatus, Scarus ghobban, S. schlegeli and initial-phase Scarus sp.) together accounted for 95% of the observed bites across five regions. Of these species, three were identified as the most important in consuming macroalgae: N. unicornis, Kyphosus sp. and K. vaigiensis. These results were supported by stable isotope analyses that incorporate nutrients from food sources over far longer periods than those examined using the assay approach. We quantified spatial patterns of macroalgal consumption and food sources across a range of scales. Firstly, across reef habitats separated by hundreds of meters, herbivory was always greatest in the structurally complex coral-dominated outer reef and reef flat habitats, which are also characterised by the highest biomass of herbivorous fish. Secondly, we showed a high degree of variability in grazing rates among regions separated by 100s km in the marine park, with different species responsible for macroalgal removal among those regions. Either N. unicornis or Kyphosus spp. were responsible for the majority of the grazing. Thirdly, we showed variability in the importance of different food sources across both habitats and regions for some consumers (e.g. Siganus spp.) but consistency for other species (e.g. Naso unicornis, Kyphosus spp.), which is likely to reflect shifts in food source availability or feeding preferences. Lastly, we found strong transcontinental differences between Keppel Islands in the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) on the east coast of Australia and Ningaloo Reef in both the diversity of the species observed feeding and on the species composition of the roving herbivorous fish community. In Ningaloo Reef, 23 species were observed biting on Sargassum, compared with just 8 in the Keppel Islands. Sargassum consumption in the Keppel Islands was dominated by a small number of species and supports the identification of Naso unicornis as a key browser species. The larger number of species feeding on macroalgae in Ningaloo Reef suggests that there may be higher functional redundancy among macroalgal consumers in this system. We also characterised the benthic community dynamics of the reef-flat and lagoon habitats to identify seasonal patterns and we experimentally determined the importance of herbivory on algae recruitment in these two habitats. Differences among habitats in algal biomass were strongly influenced by season. Lagoon habitats only had higher biomass than reef-flat habitats during part of the year (late summer/ early autumn). Herbivory had an equally strong effect on the community composition of algal recruits in the lagoon and reef flat habitats, despite the reef flat hosting a herbivorous fish community that was an order of magnitude greater in terms of biomass than the lagoon, which is characterised by younger and smaller fish (e.g. Scarus initial phase).

Lineage

Progress Code: completed
Maintenance and Update Frequency: asNeeded
Statement: Data collection, recording, database entry and quality control is the reponsibility of project staff, See WAMSI Node 3.2.2 - Trophic effects through herbivory at Ningaloo final report.

Notes

Credit
Funded by CSIRO and WAMSI (Western Australian Institute of Marine Science)
Credit
Vergès
Credit
A
Credit
Hyndes
Credit
G.A
Credit
Vanderkilft
Credit
M.A. (2011). Trophic effects through herbivory at Ningaloo Reef. Final report for WAMSI Node 3.2: Biodiversity assessment
Credit
ecosystem impacts of human usage and management evaluation. Centre for Marine Ecosystems Research
Credit
Edith Cowan University
Credit
Joondalup
Credit
Western Australia.

Data time period: 2006-07-01 to 2011-06-30

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph
Help

Related People

116,-21 116,-25 112.5,-25 112.5,-21 116,-21

114.25,-23

text: westlimit=112.5; southlimit=-25; eastlimit=116; northlimit=-21

Subjects
Coastal Waters (Australia) | West Australia Coast West, WA | Earth Science | Biological Classification | Animals/Invertebrates | Earth Science | Biological Classification | Animals/Invertebrates | Arthropods | Crustaceans | Decapods | Earth Science | Biological Classification | Animals/Vertebrates | Fish | Earth Science | Biological Classification | Animals/Vertebrates | Mammals | Earth Science | Biological Classification | Animals/Vertebrates | Reptiles | Earth Science | Biological Classification | Animals/Vertebrates | Reptiles | Turtles | Earth Science | Biological Classification | Plants | Earth Science | Biosphere | Aquatic Ecosystems | Benthic Habitat | Earth Science | Biosphere | Aquatic Ecosystems | Coastal Habitat | Earth Science | Biosphere | Aquatic Ecosystems | Marine Habitat | Earth Science | Biosphere | Aquatic Ecosystems | Reef Habitat | Earth Science | Biosphere | Ecological Dynamics | Ecosystem Functions | Food-Web Dynamics | Earth Science | Biosphere | Ecological Dynamics | Ecosystem Functions | Nutrient Cycling | Earth Science | Biosphere | Ecological Dynamics | Ecosystem Functions | Primary Production | Earth Science | Biosphere | Vegetation | Biomass | Earth Science | Biosphere | Vegetation | Dominant Species | Global / Oceans | Indian Ocean | WAMSI Node 3 Project 2: Ecosystem and Fisheries Effects of Zoning | Western Australian Marine Science Institute | oceans |

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Other Information
Identifiers
  • Local : Anzlic Identifier: ANZCW0306008773
  • Local : Marlin Record Number: 8773
  • global : bc1b3741-e7e8-5039-e044-00144f7bc0f4