Data
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=https://marlin.csiro.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/360d554f-9a1d-4bdb-a6ae-2d8012626620&rft.title=WAMSI Node 1.2.2 - Rates of Ecological Processes (Mussel Predation)&rft.identifier=Anzlic Identifier: ANZCW0306008579&rft.publisher=Australian Ocean Data Network&rft.description=Summary Although ecosystem structure and function can be influenced by both bottom up (primary productivity) and top-down (predation) processes (ref), top-down processes (predation) have been demonstrated to account for over 70% of the variation in the some temperate kelp communities (Halpern et al in press). Removal of key predators such as fish and lobsters, has been shown to have the potential to result in trophic cascade effects in which grazers may take over the system, producing massive changes to ecosystem structure. (Babcock et al 1999, Shears et al 2003, Steneck et al 2004). Locally, it has been suggested that predation by western rocklobster Panuluris cygnus may be particularly important in the structuring of local ecosystems. Abundances of P.cygnus have been shown to be strongly negatively correlated with the abundance of large (>2cm) trochid gastropods (Edgar 1990) and adult P.cygnus are known to feed readily on a wide range of locally abundant crustaceans and molluscs (James and Tong 1997, James et al 2001, Power et al 2005). Despite this, understanding about the linkages between lobster predation and local macroinvertebrates populations is still currently very limited. Here we contrast differences in the rates of predation on locally abundant blue mussels Mytilus edulis (Lamarck 1819), using fished and unfished areas as the principal source of contrast. Methods Predation rates on mussels, Mytilus eduli, were measured by adapting predator exclusion methods first described in Edgar 1990. To test the hypothesis that large predators, including P.cygnus, may be controlling abundances of molluscs, caged and uncaged mussels were deployed inside and outside fished reserves at Marmion, Rottnest Island and Jurien Bay. At each of the three locations, 12 similar sized mussels (70mm total length) were attached to a series of 8 plastic mesh grids, with 4 of the grids being fully enclosed to prevent predator access and 4 of the grids remaining open to allow predator access. (Fig. 1) 8 grids were attached to concrete blocks using cable tiestm and blocks deployed in approximately 4m water depth on seagrass substrate immediately adjacent high relief limestone reef. At Marmion and Jurien Bay, 3 blocks containing attached mussels were deployed outside reserves and 2 blocks with mussels were deployed inside reserves. At Rottnest Island 3 blocks were deployed both inside and outside of reserves. After a deployment period of seven days all grids were retrieved and the mussels on each plastic grid recorded as either alive, dead or missingProgress Code: completedMaintenance and Update Frequency: notPlannedStatement: Field observations&rft.creator=Anonymous&rft.date=2009&rft.coverage=westlimit=20; southlimit=-70; eastlimit=127; northlimit=28; projection=WGS84&rft.coverage=westlimit=20; southlimit=-70; eastlimit=127; northlimit=28; projection=WGS84&rft_rights=&rft_rights=Data is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (<a href=http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a>). Data is supplied 'as is' without any warranty or guarantee except as required by law to be given to you. The data may not be free of error, comprehensive, current or appropriate for your particular purpose. You accept all risk and responsibility for its use. ATTRIBUTION STATEMENT: The dataset [Insert-dataset-name-here] downloaded on [Insert-DD-Mmm-YYYY-here] was provided by CSIRO.&rft_subject=biota&rft_subject=Earth Science | Biosphere | Ecological Dynamics | Ecosystem Functions | Secondary Production&rft_subject=Coastal Waters (Australia) | West Australia Coast West, WA&rft_subject=Global / Oceans | Indian Ocean&rft_subject=WAMSI Node 1 Project 2: Coastal Ecosystem Characterisation&rft_subject=Western Australian Marine Science Institute&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

Data is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Data is supplied 'as is' without any warranty or guarantee except as required by law to be given to you. The data may not be free of error, comprehensive, current or appropriate for your particular purpose. You accept all risk and responsibility for its use. ATTRIBUTION STATEMENT: The dataset [Insert-dataset-name-here] downloaded on [Insert-DD-Mmm-YYYY-here] was provided by CSIRO.

Access:

Other

Full description

Summary Although ecosystem structure and function can be influenced by both bottom up (primary productivity) and top-down (predation) processes (ref), top-down processes (predation) have been demonstrated to account for over 70% of the variation in the some temperate kelp communities (Halpern et al in press). Removal of key predators such as fish and lobsters, has been shown to have the potential to result in trophic cascade effects in which grazers may take over the system, producing massive changes to ecosystem structure. (Babcock et al 1999, Shears et al 2003, Steneck et al 2004). Locally, it has been suggested that predation by western rocklobster Panuluris cygnus may be particularly important in the structuring of local ecosystems. Abundances of P.cygnus have been shown to be strongly negatively correlated with the abundance of large (>2cm) trochid gastropods (Edgar 1990) and adult P.cygnus are known to feed readily on a wide range of locally abundant crustaceans and molluscs (James and Tong 1997, James et al 2001, Power et al 2005). Despite this, understanding about the linkages between lobster predation and local macroinvertebrates populations is still currently very limited. Here we contrast differences in the rates of predation on locally abundant blue mussels Mytilus edulis (Lamarck 1819), using fished and unfished areas as the principal source of contrast. Methods Predation rates on mussels, Mytilus eduli, were measured by adapting predator exclusion methods first described in Edgar 1990. To test the hypothesis that large predators, including P.cygnus, may be controlling abundances of molluscs, caged and uncaged mussels were deployed inside and outside fished reserves at Marmion, Rottnest Island and Jurien Bay. At each of the three locations, 12 similar sized mussels (70mm total length) were attached to a series of 8 plastic mesh grids, with 4 of the grids being fully enclosed to prevent predator access and 4 of the grids remaining open to allow predator access. (Fig. 1) 8 grids were attached to concrete blocks using cable tiestm and blocks deployed in approximately 4m water depth on seagrass substrate immediately adjacent high relief limestone reef. At Marmion and Jurien Bay, 3 blocks containing attached mussels were deployed outside reserves and 2 blocks with mussels were deployed inside reserves. At Rottnest Island 3 blocks were deployed both inside and outside of reserves. After a deployment period of seven days all grids were retrieved and the mussels on each plastic grid recorded as either alive, dead or missing

Lineage

Progress Code: completed
Maintenance and Update Frequency: notPlanned
Statement: Field observations

Data time period: 2006-07-01 to 2011-06-30

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

127,28 127,-70 20,-70 20,28 127,28

73.5,-21

text: westlimit=20; southlimit=-70; eastlimit=127; northlimit=28; projection=WGS84

Other Information
Identifiers
  • Local : Anzlic Identifier: ANZCW0306008579
  • Local : Marlin Record Number: 8579
  • global : 360d554f-9a1d-4bdb-a6ae-2d8012626620