Data

Update of the Australian Soil Classification orders map with visible-near infrared spectroscopy and digital soil class mapping

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Viscarra Rossel, Raphael ; Teng, Hongfen ; Zhou, Shi ; Thorsten, Behrens
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.4225/08/5abb208d8de9f&rft.title=Update of the Australian Soil Classification orders map with visible-near infrared spectroscopy and digital soil class mapping&rft.identifier=https://doi.org/10.4225/08/5abb208d8de9f&rft.publisher=Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation&rft.description=Traditional soil maps have helped us to better understand soil, to form our concepts and to teach and transfer our ideas about it, and so they have been used for many purposes. Although, soil maps are available in many countries, there is a need for them to be updated because they are often deficient in that their spatial delineations and their descriptions are subjective and lack assessments of uncertainty. Updating them is a priority for federal soil surveys worldwide as well as for research, teaching and communication. New data from sensors and quantitative ‘digital’ methods provide us with the tools to do so. Here, we present an approach to update large scale, national soil maps with data derived from a combination of traditional soil profile classifications, classifications made with visible–near infrared (vis–NIR) spectroscopy, and digital soil class mapping (DSM). Our results present an update of the Australian Soil Classification (ASC) orders map. The overall error rate of the DSM model, tested on an independent validation set, was 55.6%, and a few of the orders were poorly classified. We discuss the possible reasons for these errors, but argue that compared to the previous ASC maps, our classification was derived objectively, using currently best available data sets and methods, the classification model was interpretable in terms of the factors of soil formation, the modelling produced a 1×1 km resolution soil map with estimates of spatial uncertainty for each soil order and our map has no artefacts at state and territory borders.&rft.creator=Viscarra Rossel, Raphael &rft.creator=Teng, Hongfen &rft.creator=Zhou, Shi &rft.creator=Thorsten, Behrens &rft.date=2018&rft.edition=v1&rft.relation=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.01.015&rft.coverage=westlimit=112.99875; southlimit=-44.00125; eastlimit=154.01625; northlimit=-9.98125; projection=WGS84&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&rft_rights=Data is accessible online and may be reused in accordance with licence conditions&rft_rights=All Rights (including copyright) CSIRO 2018.&rft_subject=TERN_Soils&rft_subject=TERN_Soils_DSM&rft_subject=Soil visible-near infrared spectra&rft_subject=Digital soil mapping&rft_subject=Soil mapping&rft_subject=Soil classification&rft_subject=Random forests&rft_subject=Soil sciences not elsewhere classified&rft_subject=Soil sciences&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Data is accessible online and may be reused in accordance with licence conditions

All Rights (including copyright) CSIRO 2018.

Access:

Open view details

Accessible for free

Contact Information



Brief description

Traditional soil maps have helped us to better understand soil, to form our concepts and to teach and transfer our ideas about it, and so they have been used for many purposes. Although, soil maps are available in many countries, there is a need for them to be updated because they are often deficient in that their spatial delineations and their descriptions are subjective and lack assessments of uncertainty. Updating them is a priority for federal soil surveys worldwide as well as for research, teaching and communication. New data from sensors and quantitative ‘digital’ methods provide us with the tools to do so. Here, we present an approach to update large scale, national soil maps with data derived from a combination of traditional soil profile classifications, classifications made with visible–near infrared (vis–NIR) spectroscopy, and digital soil class mapping (DSM). Our results present an update of the Australian Soil Classification (ASC) orders map. The overall error rate of the DSM model, tested on an independent validation set, was 55.6%, and a few of the orders were poorly classified. We discuss the possible reasons for these errors, but argue that compared to the previous ASC maps, our classification was derived objectively, using currently best available data sets and methods, the classification model was interpretable in terms of the factors of soil formation, the modelling produced a 1×1 km resolution soil map with estimates of spatial uncertainty for each soil order and our map has no artefacts at state and territory borders.

Available: 2018-03-28

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

154.01625,-9.98125 154.01625,-44.00125 112.99875,-44.00125 112.99875,-9.98125 154.01625,-9.98125

133.5075,-26.99125

Subjects

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers