Data

The effect of mud on cattle motivation for feedlot or pasture environments

University of New England, Australia
Emily, Jane ; Campbell, Dana ; Monk, Jessica ; Lea, Jim ; Colditz, Ian ; Lee, Caroline
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/62544&rft.title=The effect of mud on cattle motivation for feedlot or pasture environments&rft.identifier=https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/62544&rft.publisher=University of New England, Australia&rft.description=A total of 60 cattle (2 cohorts per pad score; 10 cattle per cohort) were habituated to the feedlot and pasture environments. Next they were trained in the Y-maze to learn the direction of the feedlot and pasture and then they were tested twice daily at 08:00 h and 18:00 h over 10 days to assess their choice to either enter a feedlot or pasture. Once the cattle made a choice, they were confined to the chosen environment until the next testing session. IceQubes were used to record lying and stepping behaviours in both environments.&rft.creator=Emily, Jane &rft.creator=Campbell, Dana &rft.creator=Monk, Jessica &rft.creator=Lea, Jim &rft.creator=Colditz, Ian &rft.creator=Lee, Caroline &rft.date=2024&rft.coverage=[[151.51462463378903,-30.613146433859068],[151.51409055175836,-30.646221350212997],[151.62223713732647,-30.646554986468033],[151.62130258965774,-30.57552323587538],[151.51509190761726,-30.574870419676824]]&rft.coverage=Chiswick Research Station, Armidale, NSW, Australia&rft_rights=Rights holder: Emily Dickson&rft_rights=Rights holder: Emily Dickson&rft_rights=Rights holder: Emily Dickson&rft_rights=Rights holder: Emily Dickson&rft_rights=This collection has been released to CSIRO staff for internal CSIRO purposes only. It has not been approved for external release. The files (if any) and associated metadata are regarded as confidential to CSIRO and/or third parties. You should not make the metadata, the files, or any material associated with it available to any person outside of CSIRO without consent and without ensuring that any proposed disclosure or use is in accordance with CSIRO's obligations to third parties.&rft_subject=feedlot&rft_subject=beef cattle&rft_subject=pasture&rft_subject=mud&rft_subject=choice&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

view details

Rights holder: Emily Dickson

Rights holder: Emily Dickson

Rights holder: Emily Dickson

Rights holder: Emily Dickson

This collection has been released to CSIRO staff for internal CSIRO purposes only. It has not been approved for external release. The files (if any) and associated metadata are regarded as confidential to CSIRO and/or third parties. You should not make the metadata, the files, or any material associated with it available to any person outside of CSIRO without consent and without ensuring that any proposed disclosure or use is in accordance with CSIRO's obligations to third parties.

Access:

Other

Full description

A total of 60 cattle (2 cohorts per pad score; 10 cattle per cohort) were habituated to the feedlot and pasture environments. Next they were trained in the Y-maze to learn the direction of the feedlot and pasture and then they were tested twice daily at 08:00 h and 18:00 h over 10 days to assess their choice to either enter a feedlot or pasture. Once the cattle made a choice, they were confined to the chosen environment until the next testing session. IceQubes were used to record lying and stepping behaviours in both environments.

Notes

Funding SourceMeat & Livestock Australia

Issued: 2024

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

Spatial Coverage And Location

text: Chiswick Research Station, Armidale, NSW, Australia

Subjects

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers