Data

South Brooman State Forest, NSW. VAST-2: Tracking the Transformation of Australia's Vegetated Landscapes

Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
Thackway, Richard
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.4227/05/5088F50BD771D&rft.title=South Brooman State Forest, NSW. VAST-2: Tracking the Transformation of Australia's Vegetated Landscapes&rft.identifier=10.4227/05/5088F50BD771D&rft.publisher=Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network&rft.description=The aim of this project is to compile land use and management practices and their observed and measured impacts and effects on vegetation condition. The results provide land managers and researchers with a tool for reporting and monitoring spatial and temporal transformations of Australia’s native vegetated landscapes due to changes in land use and management practices. Following are the details about South Brooman State Forest, NSW. Pre-European reference-analogue vegetation: The site was originally eucalypt tall open forest, multi-aged open, dry sclerophyll forest. The main overstorey species were spotted gum (Corymbia maculata), Eucalyptus muelleriana, E. paniculata, E. pilularis. The main understorey species were Acacia spp., Acmena spp. Brief chronology of changes in land use and management: 1830: Unmodified 1880: Area picked over for high quality sawlogs 1945: Area picked over for high quality sawlogs 1949: Sawlog harvesting - 85% of area 1959: Sawlog harvesting - 85% of area 1968: Commercial Thinning - 25% of area 1969: Area left to rehabilitate 1994: Wildfire - 100% of the area 1996: Pole harvesting - 5% of area 1998: Sawlog harvesting - 20% of the area 1999 and 2003: Hazard reduction 1997: Site was burnt (prescribed fire) followed by drought 2004-2011: Area left to rehabilitateInformation is compiled by year from published and unpublished sources. It includes qualitative and quantitative observations. It represents a structured narrative. Once compiled this narrative is translated into 22 indicators of vegetation condition which are grouped into three condition components: vegetation structure, species composition and regenerative capacity. The pdf is a compilation of historical land use management of the site using 12 core attributes which describes the transformation of a native vegetation community relative to its reference state. The spreadsheet provides the scores on the effects of the land management practices on the 22 indicators. Each indicator is scored from 0 to 1 for each year of the historical record; where 1 represents the reference state for each vegetation and environmental indicator, and 0 is where that vegetation indicator and/or ecological function is absent. The spreadsheet is used to sum and weight the indicators into the respective components of vegetation condition i.e. regenerative capacity, species composition and vegetation structure. The weighted transformation scores are then added to produce a single transformation index of vegetation condition for each year of the historical record. The results could be graphed and annotated to show the response of the plant community under different land use and management regimes.Data CreationStep 1. Select a representative site in terms of soil and landscape, and pre-European vegetation community.Step 2: Locate that site using google earth and record its co-ordinates in the VAST-2 Chronology DatasheetStep 3: Review relevant literature for the site and region, compiling information on land use history and associated land management practices. Simultaneously record for same year effect and impact of those practices on vegetation condition.Step 4: Identify a group of specialists with ecological knowledge about the site who can revive, validate and identify gaps in the chronology and the accuracy of the data.Step 5: Translate the observations from step 4 into 22 separately accessed vegetation condition indicators.Step 6: Circulate the results of scoring of the 22 indicators and their aggregates including the graphs to the specialists identified in the step 4.Step 7: Send results to Richard Thackway for incorporation into the ACEAS portal.Progress Code: completedMaintenance and Update Frequency: notPlanned&rft.creator=Thackway, Richard &rft.date=2012&rft.edition=1.0&rft.relation=https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7953934&rft.relation=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.093&rft.coverage=The area comprises 220 ha site, Compartment 47, part of South Brooman State Forest.&rft.coverage=northlimit=-35.473336; southlimit=-35.473336; westlimit=150.311461; eastLimit=150.311461; projection=EPSG:4326&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0&rft_rights=TERN services are provided on an as-is and as available basis. Users use any TERN services at their discretion and risk. They will be solely responsible for any damage or loss whatsoever that results from such use including use of any data obtained through TERN and any analysis performed using the TERN infrastructure. <br />Web links to and from external, third party websites should not be construed as implying any relationships with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by TERN. <br /><br />Please advise any work or publications that use this data via the online form at https://www.tern.org.au/research-publications/#reporting&rft_rights=Please cite this dataset as {Author} ({PublicationYear}). {Title}. {Version, as appropriate}. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. Dataset. {Identifier}.&rft_subject=environment&rft_subject=INDIGENOUS VEGETATION&rft_subject=EARTH SCIENCE&rft_subject=BIOSPHERE&rft_subject=VEGETATION&rft_subject=RECLAMATION/REVEGETATION/RESTORATION&rft_subject=Farm Management, Rural Management and Agribusiness&rft_subject=AGRICULTURAL AND VETERINARY SCIENCES&rft_subject=AGRICULTURE, LAND AND FARM MANAGEMENT&rft_subject=Agricultural Land Management&rft_subject=fire area (Unitless)&rft_subject=Unitless&rft_subject=fire events (Unitless)&rft_subject=soil organic matter (Unitless)&rft_subject=plant height (Unitless)&rft_subject=ground cover - green (Unitless)&rft_subject=plant functional type (Unitless)&rft_subject=species richness (Unitless)&rft_subject=ground cover (Unitless)&rft_subject=species cover (Percent)&rft_subject=Percent&rft_subject=vegetation structure (Percent)&rft_subject=Point Resolution&rft_subject=irregular&rft_subject=Corymbia maculata (Hook.) K.D.Hill & L.A.S.Johnson&rft_subject=Eucalyptus muelleriana A.W.Howitt&rft_subject=Eucalyptus paniculata Sm.&rft_subject=Eucalyptus pilularis Sm.&rft_subject=Selective Logging&rft_subject=Prescribed burning&rft_subject=High Quality Sawlogs&rft_subject=Commercial Thinning&rft_subject=Silvicultural Practices&rft_subject=Wildfire&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

TERN services are provided on an "as-is" and "as available" basis. Users use any TERN services at their discretion and risk. They will be solely responsible for any damage or loss whatsoever that results from such use including use of any data obtained through TERN and any analysis performed using the TERN infrastructure.
Web links to and from external, third party websites should not be construed as implying any relationships with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by TERN.

Please advise any work or publications that use this data via the online form at https://www.tern.org.au/research-publications/#reporting

Please cite this dataset as {Author} ({PublicationYear}). {Title}. {Version, as appropriate}. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. Dataset. {Identifier}.

Access:

Open view details

unclassified

Contact Information

Street Address:
Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
Building 1019, 80 Meiers Rd
QLD 4068
Australia
Ph: +61 7 3365 9097

esupport@tern.org.au

Brief description


The aim of this project is to compile land use and management practices and their observed and measured impacts and effects on vegetation condition. The results provide land managers and researchers with a tool for reporting and monitoring spatial and temporal transformations of Australia’s native vegetated landscapes due to changes in land use and management practices. Following are the details about South Brooman State Forest, NSW.

Pre-European reference-analogue vegetation: The site was originally eucalypt tall open forest, multi-aged open, dry sclerophyll forest. The main overstorey species were spotted gum (Corymbia maculata), Eucalyptus muelleriana, E. paniculata, E. pilularis. The main understorey species were Acacia spp., Acmena spp.

Brief chronology of changes in land use and management:
  • 1830: Unmodified
  • 1880: Area picked over for high quality sawlogs
  • 1945: Area picked over for high quality sawlogs
  • 1949: Sawlog harvesting - 85% of area
  • 1959: Sawlog harvesting - 85% of area
  • 1968: Commercial Thinning - 25% of area
  • 1969: Area left to rehabilitate
  • 1994: Wildfire - 100% of the area
  • 1996: Pole harvesting - 5% of area
  • 1998: Sawlog harvesting - 20% of the area
  • 1999 and 2003: Hazard reduction
  • 1997: Site was burnt (prescribed fire) followed by drought
  • 2004-2011: Area left to rehabilitate

Lineage


Information is compiled by year from published and unpublished sources. It includes qualitative and quantitative observations. It represents a structured narrative. Once compiled this narrative is translated into 22 indicators of vegetation condition which are grouped into three condition components: vegetation structure, species composition and regenerative capacity.

The pdf is a compilation of historical land use management of the site using 12 core attributes which describes the transformation of a native vegetation community relative to its reference state.

The spreadsheet provides the scores on the effects of the land management practices on the 22 indicators. Each indicator is scored from 0 to 1 for each year of the historical record; where 1 represents the reference state for each vegetation and environmental indicator, and 0 is where that vegetation indicator and/or ecological function is absent. The spreadsheet is used to sum and weight the indicators into the respective components of vegetation condition i.e. regenerative capacity, species composition and vegetation structure. The weighted transformation scores are then added to produce a single transformation index of vegetation condition for each year of the historical record. The results could be graphed and annotated to show the response of the plant community under different land use and management regimes.

Data Creation
Step 1. Select a representative site in terms of soil and landscape, and pre-European vegetation community.
Step 2: Locate that site using google earth and record its co-ordinates in the VAST-2 Chronology Datasheet
Step 3: Review relevant literature for the site and region, compiling information on land use history and associated land management practices. Simultaneously record for same year effect and impact of those practices on vegetation condition.
Step 4: Identify a group of specialists with ecological knowledge about the site who can revive, validate and identify gaps in the chronology and the accuracy of the data.
Step 5: Translate the observations from step 4 into 22 separately accessed vegetation condition indicators.
Step 6: Circulate the results of scoring of the 22 indicators and their aggregates including the graphs to the specialists identified in the step 4.
Step 7: Send results to Richard Thackway for incorporation into the ACEAS portal.

Progress Code: completed
Maintenance and Update Frequency: notPlanned

Notes

Credit
We at TERN acknowledge the Traditional Owners and Custodians throughout Australia, New Zealand and all nations. We honour their profound connections to land, water, biodiversity and culture and pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging.
This work was funded by ACEAS, a facility of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN), an Australian Government National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS) project.

Created: 1788-01-01

Issued: 2012-06-30

Modified: 2024-06-20

Data time period: 1788-01-01 to 2011-12-31

This dataset is part of a larger collection

150.31146,-35.47334

150.311461,-35.473336

text: The area comprises 220 ha site, Compartment 47, part of South Brooman State Forest.