Data

Saltmarsh prawn and fish species composition and production data

University of Tasmania, Australia
McLeod, Ian
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=https://metadata.imas.utas.edu.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/a15a9349-e357-4e0a-a8c0-8e6fcb306279&rft.title=Saltmarsh prawn and fish species composition and production data&rft.identifier=https://metadata.imas.utas.edu.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/a15a9349-e357-4e0a-a8c0-8e6fcb306279&rft.description=Policy and decision makers often seek guidance as to the benefits of conservation and repair of coastal seascapes, to justify and underpin any potential investments. Much is already known about the broad habitat and nursery values of seascapes among the science community, but there is also a need for estimation of clear and unambiguous market-based benefits that may arise from investment in repair. Recognising that this economic knowledge is imperfect for Australian seascapes, three case studies spanning tropical, subtropical and temperate environments explored the benefits in question. The case studies focus on saltmarsh habitats in particular, which have received very little investment in repair despite subtropical and temperate coastal saltmarsh listed as vulnerable ecological community under Australian Federal legislation. A subset of economically important species and conservative judgments were used to characterise the minimum potential economic benefit. For each of the case studies the conclusion was that while the biological information will remain imperfect, the business case for investment in the repair and conservation of coastal seascapes is compelling. We outline priorities for further research to make the business case more tangible to policy makers, stakeholders and the general public.Maintenance and Update Frequency: asNeededStatement: Tropical case study Banana prawns, Fenneropenaeus merguiensis, use tropical estuaries as nursery grounds (Vance et al. 1990, Sheaves et al. 2012), where they rely on saltmarsh vegetation for part of their nutritional requirements (Abrantes and Sheaves 2009). Banana prawns were chosen as a study species for this case study because they are: (a) Highly fecund and an annual stock that will recruit rapidly to repaired environments; (b) A commercially important food species; (c) Important targets of recreational fishers throughout north Queensland estuaries; (d) Vital prey of other high profile commercial/recreational species such as barramundi; and (e) Known to exhibit a random escape response which means that an assumption of minimal under-sampling is valid. Fish are highly variable in escape-patterns to sampling by most types of sampling gears that can provide accurate estimates of density. Compared to fish, banana prawns are ideal targets, particularly for cast net sampling, a gear type that is particularly suitable for small mangrove lined estuaries and this gear type provides for accuracy in sampling through generally high replication (Johnston & Sheaves 2007). Banana prawns as a highly valued stock for both commercial and recreational catch also makes them an ideal indicator species to use in any broad estimates of the benefits of seascape repair. The tropical study and prior work found that estimates of productivity of individual components of the estuary were highly variable and depended on a number assumptions that are difficult to validate (Minello et al. 2008, Rönnbäck et al. 1999, Rozas & Minello 2011). In comparison, estimates at the whole-of-estuary level, “seascape” require a relatively low number of assumptions and produce estimates with relatively low variability (Sheaves 2017, Nagelkerken et al. 2015). For the tropical case study, Sheaves et al. (in review) found as a conservative estimate a maximum juvenile prawn biomass of 6.5 g m-2 for the 2m wide bands along the estuary edge where prawns are found. For the estuary studied, with an edge area of 5.6 ha and 11.5 km total length, the conservative total biomass of juvenile r was 370 kg. The actual estuary productivity would likely be much higher because this estimate only relates to the maximum juvenile stock for a sampling occasion and does not take into account continual movements of prawns to offshore adult habitat once they reach a sufficient size. To more precisely calculate estuary productivity for banana prawns information would be needed on patterns of recruitment, growth rates, mortality, predation and emigration. Furthermore, estuaries host a variety of organisms and similar information would also be required for all other crustacean and finfish as well as the net primary productivity that is exported from the estuary. Suffice it to say an estimate of banana prawn productivity 370 km for an estuary of 11.5 km total length is probably orders of magnitude below total estuary productivity. While this provides a baseline estimate that can be used to demonstrate the potential benefits of seascape repair, much more extensive studies would be required to link production of banana prawns to particular areas of saltmarsh habitat (Sheaves and Johnston 2010, Sheaves et al. 2012). -------------------------- Sub-tropical case study To provide a case study for the east coast subtropical regions, we selected school prawns (Metapenaeus macleayi) because (1) they are highly reliant on estuarine nursery habitats and primary productivity derived from estuarine habitats for rapid growth through their early life history stages (Taylor et al in press), (2) the species is important to both commercial and recreational fisheries (Taylor et al 2017), (3) the species is highly fecund, and given reasonable freshwater inflow to estuaries it is unlikely to experience stock-related limitations to recruitment, and (4) school prawns are a fast growing annual species. School prawns are mostly harvested commercially, this commercial harvest provides product for human consumption and is widely used as bait by recreational fishers. Given the life-history characteristics of the school prawn, benefits of successful repair of their habitat are likely over a short time frame. -------------------------- Temperate case study Compared to East Coast Tropical and Subtropical locations in Australia, there is very little knowledge of prawn and fish use of temperate saltmarshes. Saltmarshes of the Circular Head region of north-west Tasmania waswere chosen for the East Coast Temperate case study for a number of reasons. First, the Circular Head region is home to about a fourth of all coastal saltmarshes in Tasmania and form part of a rich seascape matrix with expansive tidal flats, seagrass beds and buffering Melaleuca ericifolia swam forests (Mount et al 2010). Second, the area is very important for commercial and recreational fisheries. Third, the Circular Head region saltmarshes have been subject to most extensive clearing and drainage works, with potential for habitat repair through tidal restoration works (Prahalad 2014). Fish use data for are likely to determine whether there is a case for saltmarsh repair to improve the habitat value for fish as part of the broader seascape nursery. Prahalad et al (in review) found 11 fish species using Circular Head saltmarshes with a high mean density of > 72 fish per 100 m-2 (sample data from April-May 2017). The family Atherinidae (Silversides) contributed 3 species and 74% of the total catch numbers. Commercial and recreational species that utilise these saltmarshes in northwest Tasmanian seascapes include: yellow-eye mullet (Aldrichetta forsteri), australian salmon (Arripis truttaceuos) and greenback flounder (Rhombosolea tapirina) . These three species contributed close to 20% of the total catch numbers. Of these yellow-eye mullet was most abundant and common, present in 24 (65%) of the 37 nets that caught fish and made up 19% of the total catch. Extended sampling throughout the year may reveal further species using saltmarshes.&rft.creator=McLeod, Ian &rft.date=2016&rft.coverage=westlimit=143.739256606; southlimit=-44.8415404185; eastlimit=157.731445178; northlimit=-15.8277726498&rft.coverage=westlimit=143.739256606; southlimit=-44.8415404185; eastlimit=157.731445178; northlimit=-15.8277726498&rft_rights=This dataset is hosted by the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, on behalf of James Cook University (JCU) through the National Environmental Science Program (NESP) Marine Biodiversity Hub.&rft_rights= http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&rft_rights=http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png&rft_rights=WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related&rft_rights=License Graphic&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License&rft_rights=http://creativecommons.org/international/&rft_rights=WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related&rft_rights=WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related&rft_rights=License Text&rft_rights=The citation in a list of references is: citation author name/s (year metadata published), metadata title. Citation author organisation/s. File identifier and Data accessed at (add http link).&rft_rights=The data described in this record are the intellectual property of TropWATER, James Cook University (JCU).&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0&rft_subject=biota&rft_subject=EARTH SCIENCE | AGRICULTURE | AGRICULTURAL AQUATIC SCIENCES | FISHERIES&rft_subject=EARTH SCIENCE | AGRICULTURE | AGRICULTURAL PLANT SCIENCE | RECLAMATION/REVEGETATION/RESTORATION&rft_subject=EARTH SCIENCE | BIOSPHERE | ECOSYSTEMS | MARINE ECOSYSTEMS | COASTAL | SALT MARSH&rft_subject=EARTH SCIENCE | BIOSPHERE | ECOSYSTEMS | MARINE ECOSYSTEMS | ESTUARY&rft_subject=EARTH SCIENCE | BIOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION | ANIMALS/INVERTEBRATES | ARTHROPODS | CRUSTACEANS&rft_subject=EARTH SCIENCE | BIOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION | ANIMALS/VERTEBRATES | FISH&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

This dataset is hosted by the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, on behalf of James Cook University (JCU) through the National Environmental Science Program (NESP) Marine Biodiversity Hub.

http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png

WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related

License Graphic

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

http://creativecommons.org/international/

WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related

WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related

License Text

The citation in a list of references is: citation author name/s (year metadata published), metadata title. Citation author organisation/s. File identifier and Data accessed at (add http link).

The data described in this record are the intellectual property of TropWATER, James Cook University (JCU).

Access:

Open

Brief description

Policy and decision makers often seek guidance as to the benefits of conservation and repair of coastal seascapes, to justify and underpin any potential investments. Much is already known about the broad habitat and nursery values of seascapes among the science community, but there is also a need for estimation of clear and unambiguous market-based benefits that may arise from investment in repair. Recognising that this economic knowledge is imperfect for Australian seascapes, three case studies spanning tropical, subtropical and temperate environments explored the benefits in question. The case studies focus on saltmarsh habitats in particular, which have received very little investment in repair despite subtropical and temperate coastal saltmarsh listed as vulnerable ecological community under Australian Federal legislation. A subset of economically important species and conservative judgments were used to characterise the minimum potential economic benefit. For each of the case studies the conclusion was that while the biological information will remain imperfect, the business case for investment in the repair and conservation of coastal seascapes is compelling. We outline priorities for further research to make the business case more tangible to policy makers, stakeholders and the general public.

Lineage

Maintenance and Update Frequency: asNeeded
Statement: Tropical case study Banana prawns, Fenneropenaeus merguiensis, use tropical estuaries as nursery grounds (Vance et al. 1990, Sheaves et al. 2012), where they rely on saltmarsh vegetation for part of their nutritional requirements (Abrantes and Sheaves 2009). Banana prawns were chosen as a study species for this case study because they are: (a) Highly fecund and an annual stock that will recruit rapidly to repaired environments; (b) A commercially important food species; (c) Important targets of recreational fishers throughout north Queensland estuaries; (d) Vital prey of other high profile commercial/recreational species such as barramundi; and (e) Known to exhibit a random escape response which means that an assumption of minimal under-sampling is valid. Fish are highly variable in escape-patterns to sampling by most types of sampling gears that can provide accurate estimates of density. Compared to fish, banana prawns are ideal targets, particularly for cast net sampling, a gear type that is particularly suitable for small mangrove lined estuaries and this gear type provides for accuracy in sampling through generally high replication (Johnston & Sheaves 2007). Banana prawns as a highly valued stock for both commercial and recreational catch also makes them an ideal indicator species to use in any broad estimates of the benefits of seascape repair. The tropical study and prior work found that estimates of productivity of individual components of the estuary were highly variable and depended on a number assumptions that are difficult to validate (Minello et al. 2008, Rönnbäck et al. 1999, Rozas & Minello 2011). In comparison, estimates at the whole-of-estuary level, “seascape” require a relatively low number of assumptions and produce estimates with relatively low variability (Sheaves 2017, Nagelkerken et al. 2015). For the tropical case study, Sheaves et al. (in review) found as a conservative estimate a maximum juvenile prawn biomass of 6.5 g m-2 for the 2m wide bands along the estuary edge where prawns are found. For the estuary studied, with an edge area of 5.6 ha and 11.5 km total length, the conservative total biomass of juvenile r was 370 kg. The actual estuary productivity would likely be much higher because this estimate only relates to the maximum juvenile stock for a sampling occasion and does not take into account continual movements of prawns to offshore adult habitat once they reach a sufficient size. To more precisely calculate estuary productivity for banana prawns information would be needed on patterns of recruitment, growth rates, mortality, predation and emigration. Furthermore, estuaries host a variety of organisms and similar information would also be required for all other crustacean and finfish as well as the net primary productivity that is exported from the estuary. Suffice it to say an estimate of banana prawn productivity 370 km for an estuary of 11.5 km total length is probably orders of magnitude below total estuary productivity. While this provides a baseline estimate that can be used to demonstrate the potential benefits of seascape repair, much more extensive studies would be required to link production of banana prawns to particular areas of saltmarsh habitat (Sheaves and Johnston 2010, Sheaves et al. 2012). -------------------------- Sub-tropical case study To provide a case study for the east coast subtropical regions, we selected school prawns (Metapenaeus macleayi) because (1) they are highly reliant on estuarine nursery habitats and primary productivity derived from estuarine habitats for rapid growth through their early life history stages (Taylor et al in press), (2) the species is important to both commercial and recreational fisheries (Taylor et al 2017), (3) the species is highly fecund, and given reasonable freshwater inflow to estuaries it is unlikely to experience stock-related limitations to recruitment, and (4) school prawns are a fast growing annual species. School prawns are mostly harvested commercially, this commercial harvest provides product for human consumption and is widely used as bait by recreational fishers. Given the life-history characteristics of the school prawn, benefits of successful repair of their habitat are likely over a short time frame. -------------------------- Temperate case study Compared to East Coast Tropical and Subtropical locations in Australia, there is very little knowledge of prawn and fish use of temperate saltmarshes. Saltmarshes of the Circular Head region of north-west Tasmania waswere chosen for the East Coast Temperate case study for a number of reasons. First, the Circular Head region is home to about a fourth of all coastal saltmarshes in Tasmania and form part of a rich seascape matrix with expansive tidal flats, seagrass beds and buffering Melaleuca ericifolia swam forests (Mount et al 2010). Second, the area is very important for commercial and recreational fisheries. Third, the Circular Head region saltmarshes have been subject to most extensive clearing and drainage works, with potential for habitat repair through tidal restoration works (Prahalad 2014). Fish use data for are likely to determine whether there is a case for saltmarsh repair to improve the habitat value for fish as part of the broader seascape nursery. Prahalad et al (in review) found 11 fish species using Circular Head saltmarshes with a high mean density of > 72 fish per 100 m-2 (sample data from April-May 2017). The family Atherinidae (Silversides) contributed 3 species and 74% of the total catch numbers. Commercial and recreational species that utilise these saltmarshes in northwest Tasmanian seascapes include: yellow-eye mullet (Aldrichetta forsteri), australian salmon (Arripis truttaceuos) and greenback flounder (Rhombosolea tapirina) . These three species contributed close to 20% of the total catch numbers. Of these yellow-eye mullet was most abundant and common, present in 24 (65%) of the 37 nets that caught fish and made up 19% of the total catch. Extended sampling throughout the year may reveal further species using saltmarshes.

Notes

Credit
National Environmental Science Program (NESP) Marine Biodiversity Hub
Credit
Department of the Environment, Australian Government

Created: 2016-09-28

Data time period: 2016-01-01

This dataset is part of a larger collection

157.73145,-15.82777 157.73145,-44.84154 143.73926,-44.84154 143.73926,-15.82777 157.73145,-15.82777

150.735350892,-30.33465653415

text: westlimit=143.739256606; southlimit=-44.8415404185; eastlimit=157.731445178; northlimit=-15.8277726498

Other Information
(DATA ACCESS - SUB-TROPICAL case study data [modelling study; output contained within publication])

uri : https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13157-018-1022-9#Sec7

(DATA ACCESS - TEMPERATE case study field data [direct download])

uri : https://data.imas.utas.edu.au/attachments/a15a9349-e357-4e0a-a8c0-8e6fcb306279/Tasmanian_Saltmarsh_Fish_Sampling_DATASHEET_2019.xlsx

(NESP Marine Biodiversity Hub Project B4 webpage)

uri : https://www.nespmarine.edu.au/document/australias-saltmarshes-synopsis-underpin-repair-and-conservation-australias-environmentally

global : 4fde31ee-7a51-4029-8e32-c020dfce56f8

Identifiers
  • global : a15a9349-e357-4e0a-a8c0-8e6fcb306279