Data

Repeatability of baited remote underwater video station (BRUVS) results within and between seasons

James Cook University
Sherman, Samantha ; Simpfendorfer, Colin
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25903/5f7bccf305a6d&rft.title=Repeatability of baited remote underwater video station (BRUVS) results within and between seasons&rft.identifier=10.25903/5f7bccf305a6d&rft.publisher=James Cook University&rft.description=Complete dataset for Repeatability of baited remote underwater video station (BRUVS) results within and between seasons in PLoS ONE by: C. Samantha Sherman, Michelle R. Heupel, Mohini Johnson, Muslimin Kaimuddin, L.M. Sjamsul Qamar,Andrew Chin,Colin A. Simpfendorfer. Abstract [Related Publication]: Baited remote underwater video stations (BRUVS) are increasingly being used to evaluate and monitor reef communities. Many BRUVS studies compare multiple sites sampled at single time points that may differ from the sampling time of another site. As BRUVS use grows in its application to provide data relevant to sustainable management, marine protected area success, and overall reef health, understanding repeatability of sampling results is vital. We examined the repeatability of BRUVS results for the elasmobranch community both within and between seasons and years, and explored environmental factors affecting abundances at two sites in Indonesia. On 956 BRUVS, 1139 elasmobranchs (69% rays, 31% sharks) were observed. We found consistent results in species composition and abundances within a season and across years. However, elasmobranch abundances were significantly higher in the wet season. The elasmobranch community was significantly different between the two sites sampled, one site being more coastal and easily accessed by fishermen. Our results demonstrate that while BRUVS are a reliable and repeatable method for surveying elasmobranchs, care must be taken in the timing of sampling between different regions to ensure that any differences observed are due to inherent differences amongst sampling areas as opposed to seasonal dissimilarities. The full methodology is available in the Open Access publication from the Related Publications link below. &rft.creator=Sherman, Samantha &rft.creator=Simpfendorfer, Colin &rft.date=2020&rft.relation=https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244154&rft.coverage=122.43803501129,-5.76033949362 122.43803501129,-5.4213839629991 122.66600131989,-5.4213839629991 122.66600131989,-5.76033949362 122.43803501129,-5.76033949362&rft.coverage=Indonesia&rft_rights=&rft_rights=CC BY-NC 4.0: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0&rft_subject=rays&rft_subject=sharks&rft_subject=Indonesia&rft_subject=BRUVS&rft_subject=community composition&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Non-Commercial Licence view details
CC-BY-NC

CC BY-NC 4.0: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Access:

Open view details

Open: free access under license

Full description

Complete dataset for "Repeatability of baited remote underwater video station (BRUVS) results within and between seasons" in PLoS ONE by: C. Samantha Sherman, Michelle R. Heupel, Mohini Johnson, Muslimin Kaimuddin, L.M. Sjamsul Qamar,Andrew Chin,Colin A. Simpfendorfer.

Abstract [Related Publication]: Baited remote underwater video stations (BRUVS) are increasingly being used to evaluate and monitor reef communities. Many BRUVS studies compare multiple sites sampled at single time points that may differ from the sampling time of another site. As BRUVS use grows in its application to provide data relevant to sustainable management, marine protected area success, and overall reef health, understanding repeatability of sampling results is vital. We examined the repeatability of BRUVS results for the elasmobranch community both within and between seasons and years, and explored environmental factors affecting abundances at two sites in Indonesia. On 956 BRUVS, 1139 elasmobranchs (69% rays, 31% sharks) were observed. We found consistent results in species composition and abundances within a season and across years. However, elasmobranch abundances were significantly higher in the wet season. The elasmobranch community was significantly different between the two sites sampled, one site being more coastal and easily accessed by fishermen. Our results demonstrate that while BRUVS are a reliable and repeatable method for surveying elasmobranchs, care must be taken in the timing of sampling between different regions to ensure that any differences observed are due to inherent differences amongst sampling areas as opposed to seasonal dissimilarities.

The full methodology is available in the Open Access publication from the Related Publications link below.

Created: 2020-10-06

Data time period: 09 04 2017 to 23 08 2019

This dataset is part of a larger collection

122.43804,-5.76034 122.43804,-5.42138 122.666,-5.42138 122.666,-5.76034 122.43804,-5.76034

122.55201816559,-5.5908617283095

text: Indonesia

Subjects

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers
  • DOI : 10.25903/5F7BCCF305A6D
  • Local : researchdata.jcu.edu.au//published/80f1f76ea308844463da716f1b583511
  • Local : 922dc96df6b58883c912aed77ac38190
ACN 633 798 857