Data

Predatory strategies and behaviours in cephalopods are altered by elevated CO2

James Cook University
Spady, Blake ; Munday, Philip ; Watson, Sue-Ann
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.4225/28/5aa74ecb58f42&rft.title=Predatory strategies and behaviours in cephalopods are altered by elevated CO2&rft.identifier=10.4225/28/5aa74ecb58f42&rft.publisher=James Cook University&rft.description=Abstract [Related Publication]: There is increasing evidence that projected near-future carbon dioxide (CO₂) levels can alter predator avoidance behaviour in marine invertebrates, yet little is known about the possible effects on predatory behaviours. Here we tested the effects of elevated CO₂ on the predatory behaviours of two ecologically distinct cephalopod species, the pygmy squid, Idiosepius pygmaeus, and the bigfin reef squid, Sepioteuthis lessoniana. Both species exhibited an increased latency to attack and altered body pattern choice during the attack sequence at elevated CO₂. I. pygmaeus also exhibited a 20% decrease in predation rate, an increased striking distance, and reduced preference for attacking the posterior end of prey at elevated CO₂. Elevated CO₂ increased activity levels of S. lessoniana comparable to those previously shown in I. pygmaeus, which could adversely affect their energy budget and increase their potential to be preyed upon. The effects of elevated CO₂ on predatory behaviours, predation strategies and activity levels of cephalopods reported here could have far- reaching consequences in marine ecosystems due to the ecological importance of cephalopods in the marine food web.Methodology Overview: Here, we tested the effects of current-day control (438µatm) and two projected near-future CO₂ levels (737 and 934µatm) on the predatory interactions of pygmy squid with a common prey item, the glass shrimp, Acetes sibogae australis (Jackson, 1992). The CO₂ treatments were selected to match projected CO₂ levels in the atmosphere and ocean by the end of this century for a moderate and high emissions trajectory based on representative concentration pathways (RCP) 6.0 and 8.5 respectively (Collins et al., 2013).We exposed bigfin reef squid to current-day control (435µatm) and projected future CO₂ levels (935µatm) following RCP8.5 (Collins et al., 2013), and tested their predatory interactions with a common reef fish, the spiny chromis damselfish, Acanthochromis polyacanthus. Additionally, the activity levels of bigfin reef squid were also compared between CO₂  treatments to determine if elevated CO₂ increases activity as observed in pygmy squid (Spady et al., 2014), or decreases activity, as seen in paralarval D. pealeii (Zakroff et al. 2017).  The following information was extracted from the videos:•    proportion of animals that attacked prey•    latency to attack – from when prey is introduced to when attack pose begins•    time holding attack pose – squid aligns anteroposteriorly with prey and streamlines mantle and arms, concluded when strike with tentacles is initiated•    striking distance – the distance from the tentacles to the prey when arms are splayed open to expose striking tentacles•    attack direction – the angle of the squid in relation to the prey at time of attack in which the posterior end of the of the prey is 0˚ and the anterior end is 180˚; Attacks were defined as ‘posterior’ if less than 45˚, ‘lateral’ if between 45˚ and 135˚, and ‘anterior’ if greater than 135˚•    body pattern – choice of body pattern during the attack pose, categorised as ‘dark mottle’ or a more transparent ‘uniform blanch’ (Hanlon and Messenger, 1988)•    proportion of animals that captured prey on first strike attemptFor bigfin reef squid, LoliTrack software (Loligo Systems v4.2) was used to extract the total distance moved, proportion of time the squid was active, and average speed from videos. The full methodology is available in the publication shown in the Related Publications link below. &rft.creator=Spady, Blake &rft.creator=Munday, Philip &rft.creator=Watson, Sue-Ann &rft.date=2018&rft.relation=http://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14098&rft.coverage=146.87362640895,-19.185313861616 146.85985281662,-19.201753340412 146.85213243472,-19.221405740507 146.85122098803,-19.242346564744 146.8572076953,-19.262525878734 146.86950653591,-19.279969012117 146.88691361365,-19.292969616334 146.90772500247,-19.30025627094 146.92990353862,-19.301116491584 146.95127823248,-19.295466172563 146.96975678006,-19.283857781859 146.98353037239,-19.267426521014 146.99125075429,-19.247779628113 146.99216220098,-19.226839496751 146.98617549371,-19.206655796662 146.9738766531,-19.189204873547 146.95646957536,-19.176196051381 146.93565818654,-19.168903889585 146.91347965039,-19.168042976067 146.89210495653,-19.173697681183 146.87362640895,-19.185313861616&rft.coverage=146.76149075839,-19.326899479815 146.76040462761,-19.326907873797 146.75937440465,-19.327232575112 146.75850093491,-19.327841798001 146.75786971968,-19.328675904725 146.75754254672,-19.329653244381 146.75755144199,-19.330678146495 146.75789553476,-19.331650286554 146.75854114283,-19.332474506451 146.75942506959,-19.333070128554 146.76046079013,-19.333378851952 146.7615469209,-19.333370458303 146.76257714386,-19.333045769189 146.76345061361,-19.33243656571 146.76408182883,-19.33160247819 146.7644090018,-19.330625150198 146.76440010653,-19.329600247752 146.76405601376,-19.32862809549 146.76341040568,-19.327803856184 146.76252647892,-19.327208214876 146.76149075839,-19.326899479815&rft.coverage=146.82546090676,-19.251905358837 146.82483172389,-19.251396238687 146.82406668973,-19.25109559159 146.82324069117,-19.251032848166 146.82243458269,-19.251214150446 146.82172727181,-19.251621750545 146.82118799504,-19.252215748238 146.82086954056,-19.252937997239 146.8208030809,-19.253717797597 146.82099512161,-19.254478816751 146.82142686439,-19.255146561598 146.82205604726,-19.255655670109 146.82282108142,-19.255956308848 146.82364707998,-19.256019050389 146.82445318846,-19.25583775342 146.82516049935,-19.255430163796 146.82569977611,-19.254836177742 146.82601823059,-19.254113937099 146.82608469025,-19.253334138625 146.82589264954,-19.25257311416 146.82546090676,-19.251905358837&rft.coverage=Experiments were conducted at James Cook University’s research aquarium in Townsville, Australia&rft.coverage=Pygmy squid were collected from Cleveland Bay in Townsville, Queensland, Australia (19˚24’S, 146˚82’E)&rft.coverage=Bigfin reef squid were collected from the Townsville breakwater, Queensland, Australia (19˚24’S, 146˚82’E&rft_rights=&rft_rights=CC BY 4.0: Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0&rft_subject=activity&rft_subject=cephalopod&rft_subject=ocean acidification&rft_subject=predator-prey interaction&rft_subject=predatory behaviour&rft_subject=squid&rft_subject=ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

CC BY 4.0: Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Access:

Open view details

Open: free access under license

Full description

Abstract [Related Publication]: There is increasing evidence that projected near-future carbon dioxide (CO₂) levels can alter predator avoidance behaviour in marine invertebrates, yet little is known about the possible effects on predatory behaviours. Here we tested the effects of elevated CO₂ on the predatory behaviours of two ecologically distinct cephalopod species, the pygmy squid, Idiosepius pygmaeus, and the bigfin reef squid, Sepioteuthis lessoniana. Both species exhibited an increased latency to attack and altered body pattern choice during the attack sequence at elevated CO₂. I. pygmaeus also exhibited a 20% decrease in predation rate, an increased striking distance, and reduced preference for attacking the posterior end of prey at elevated CO₂. Elevated CO₂ increased activity levels of S. lessoniana comparable to those previously shown in I. pygmaeus, which could adversely affect their energy budget and increase their potential to be preyed upon. The effects of elevated CO₂ on predatory behaviours, predation strategies and activity levels of cephalopods reported here could have far- reaching consequences in marine ecosystems due to the ecological importance of cephalopods in the marine food web.

Methodology Overview: Here, we tested the effects of current-day control (438µatm) and two projected near-future CO₂ levels (737 and 934µatm) on the predatory interactions of pygmy squid with a common prey item, the glass shrimp, Acetes sibogae australis (Jackson, 1992). The CO₂ treatments were selected to match projected CO₂ levels in the atmosphere and ocean by the end of this century for a moderate and high emissions trajectory based on representative concentration pathways (RCP) 6.0 and 8.5 respectively (Collins et al., 2013).

We exposed bigfin reef squid to current-day control (435µatm) and projected future CO₂ levels (935µatm) following RCP8.5 (Collins et al., 2013), and tested their predatory interactions with a common reef fish, the spiny chromis damselfish, Acanthochromis polyacanthus. Additionally, the activity levels of bigfin reef squid were also compared between CO₂  treatments to determine if elevated CO₂ increases activity as observed in pygmy squid (Spady et al., 2014), or decreases activity, as seen in paralarval D. pealeii (Zakroff et al. 2017).  

The following information was extracted from the videos:

•    proportion of animals that attacked prey

•    latency to attack – from when prey is introduced to when attack pose begins

•    time holding attack pose – squid aligns anteroposteriorly with prey and streamlines mantle and arms, concluded when strike with tentacles is initiated

•    striking distance – the distance from the tentacles to the prey when arms are splayed open to expose striking tentacles

•    attack direction – the angle of the squid in relation to the prey at time of attack in which the posterior end of the of the prey is 0˚ and the anterior end is 180˚; Attacks were defined as ‘posterior’ if less than 45˚, ‘lateral’ if between 45˚ and 135˚, and ‘anterior’ if greater than 135˚

•    body pattern – choice of body pattern during the attack pose, categorised as ‘dark mottle’ or a more transparent ‘uniform blanch’ (Hanlon and Messenger, 1988)

•    proportion of animals that captured prey on first strike attempt

For bigfin reef squid, LoliTrack software (Loligo Systems v4.2) was used to extract the total distance moved, proportion of time the squid was active, and average speed from videos. 

The full methodology is available in the publication shown in the Related Publications link below.

 

Notes

This dataset is available as a spreadsheet in MS Excel (.xlsx) and Open Document formats (.ods)

Created: 2018-03-13

Data time period: 2016 to 30 06 2016

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

146.87363,-19.18531 146.85985,-19.20175 146.85213,-19.22141 146.85122,-19.24235 146.85721,-19.26253 146.86951,-19.27997 146.88691,-19.29297 146.90773,-19.30026 146.9299,-19.30112 146.95128,-19.29547 146.96976,-19.28386 146.98353,-19.26743 146.99125,-19.24778 146.99216,-19.22684 146.98618,-19.20666 146.97388,-19.1892 146.95647,-19.1762 146.93566,-19.1689 146.91348,-19.16804 146.8921,-19.1737 146.87363,-19.18531

146.92169159451,-19.234579733825

146.76149,-19.3269 146.7604,-19.32691 146.75937,-19.32723 146.7585,-19.32784 146.75787,-19.32868 146.75754,-19.32965 146.75755,-19.33068 146.7579,-19.33165 146.75854,-19.33247 146.75943,-19.33307 146.76046,-19.33338 146.76155,-19.33337 146.76258,-19.33305 146.76345,-19.33244 146.76408,-19.3316 146.76441,-19.33063 146.7644,-19.3296 146.76406,-19.32863 146.76341,-19.3278 146.76253,-19.32721 146.76149,-19.3269

146.76097577426,-19.330139165884

146.82546,-19.25191 146.82483,-19.2514 146.82407,-19.2511 146.82324,-19.25103 146.82243,-19.25121 146.82173,-19.25162 146.82119,-19.25222 146.82087,-19.25294 146.8208,-19.25372 146.821,-19.25448 146.82143,-19.25515 146.82206,-19.25566 146.82282,-19.25596 146.82365,-19.25602 146.82445,-19.25584 146.82516,-19.25543 146.8257,-19.25484 146.82602,-19.25411 146.82608,-19.25333 146.82589,-19.25257 146.82546,-19.25191

146.82344388557,-19.253525949277

text: Experiments were conducted at James Cook University’s research aquarium in Townsville, Australia

text: Pygmy squid were collected from Cleveland Bay in Townsville, Queensland, Australia (19˚24’S, 146˚82’E)

text: Bigfin reef squid were collected from the Townsville breakwater, Queensland, Australia (19˚24’S, 146˚82’E

Subjects

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers
  • DOI : 10.4225/28/5AA74ECB58F42
  • Local : researchdata.jcu.edu.au//published/d0d6b9733b48f910e38cb28bb800e1a3
  • Local : 733a8d36d889fe2e359ec6655e6defc8