Predator's pick: Lobster predation on urchins - data and code from experimental investigation

Full description

This dataset comprises observations from four captive feeding experiments conducted at IMAS Taroona laboratories between 2020 and 2024. The experiments investigated predation by southern rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) on the invasive long-spined sea urchin (Centrostephanus rodgersii) and the native sea urchin (Heliocidaris erythrogramma). Experimental conditions included live urchins, urchin roe, and trimmed urchins. This data is directly linked to the following publication: Jennifer E Smith, John Keane, Craig Mundy, Caleb Gardner, Michael Oellermann, Spiny lobsters prefer native prey over range-extending invasive urchins, ICES Journal of Marine Science, Volume 79, Issue 4, May 2022, Pages 1353–1362, https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsac058

Lineage

Maintenance and Update Frequency: notPlanned

Statement: Four separate captive feeding experiments were conducted at IMAS Taroona facilities, Tasmania, between 2020-2024 (Table 1). All lobsters used in experiments were collected by hand on SCUBA or by baited pot from either Elephant Rock Research Reserve (St Helens, North-East Tasmania) or Crayfish Point Research Reserve (Taroona, South-East Tasmania). Lobsters were collected under permit from the Tasmanian Government (#24068). Elephant Rock Research reserve represents a site of extensive urchin barren with high abundance of C. rodgersii and these lobsters are considered ‘familiar’ with the alien species. In comparison, Crayfish Point Research Reserve represents a kelp-dominated reef beyond the urchin invasion front, where C. rodgersii have not been recorded, therefore these lobsters are considered ‘naïve’. Experiments were all conducted in austral summer (November – February) to avoid behavioural impact of moulting and maximise likelihood of predation occurring (Kelly et al., 1999). Prior to experiments, lobsters were held communally in large 3000l tanks with ample sheltering. During experiments all lobsters were kept in individual tanks and were allowed at least 24 hours to acclimatise to their tank environment. All tanks were under cover or inside and had constant flow of filtered raw seawater. Urchins (C. rodgersii and H. erythrogramma) for all experiments were collected by divers from sites where kelp was present (i.e., not barrens) to ensure consistent prey quality (Eurich et al., 2014). Urchin collection sites included Fortescue Bay (both species) and Dodges Ferry (H. erythrogramma only). Urchins were collected under permit from the Tasmanian Government (#24088). Urchins were kept in holding tanks (400-2000-l) and fed drift kelp to maintain health. Lobsters were split into three size classes: small (carapace length [CL] < 110 mm), medium (CL 110–140 mm), and large (CL > 140 mm). Urchins were always offered within the gape-limitation threshold and best efforts were made to match offered urchin size (test diameter, TD) to the size of the lobster using the size relationship (Ling et al., 2009). Where experiments were recorded, tanks were lit with red LED strip lights (Fluval Aquasky 2.0, USA) hanging above the water to allow filming in the dark with least disturbance to the animal. GoPros on timelapse mode were used to monitor activity and videos were analysed manually. For more information, please see the associated publication [link TBC].

Notes

Purpose
To support research into predator-prey interactions and the potential role of rock lobsters in controlling invasive sea urchin populations.