Data

Potential Inconsistencies in the Standard of Protection Afforded to Workers from the Application of Risk Management in Queensland Workplaces

Central Queensland University
Lisa Enfantie (Aggregated by)
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25946/26973163.v1&rft.title=Potential Inconsistencies in the Standard of Protection Afforded to Workers from the Application of Risk Management in Queensland Workplaces&rft.identifier=10.25946/26973163.v1&rft.publisher=Central Queensland University&rft.description=This study proposes to examine potential inconsistencies between the standards of protection afforded to workers under three pieces of workplace health and safety legislation in Queensland due to the application of risk management requirements. It is important to understand if the differences in nomenclature in the Acts are creating disparity in the protection requirements afforded to workers. If there are, this indicates there is a group, or groups, of workers who are not provided a high standard of risk management while at work or if there is no disparity then why are the terms not the same.&rft.creator=Lisa Enfantie&rft.date=2026&rft_rights= https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en&rft_subject=Occupational and workplace health and safety&rft_subject=Other law and legal studies not elsewhere classified&rft_subject=Risk Management&rft_subject=Coal Mining&rft_subject=Work Health and Safety&rft_subject=Mining and Quarrying&rft_subject=As Low As Reasonably Achievable&rft_subject=So Far As Is Reasonably Practicable&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data
Cite Saved to MyRDA Save to MyRDA

Licence & Rights:

Other view details

Full description

This study proposes to examine potential inconsistencies between the standards of protection afforded to workers under three pieces of workplace health and safety legislation in Queensland due to the application of risk management requirements. It is important to understand if the differences in nomenclature in the Acts are creating disparity in the protection requirements afforded to workers. If there are, this indicates there is a group, or groups, of workers who are not provided a high standard of risk management while at work or if there is no disparity then why are the terms not the same.

Data time period: 2023-09-01 to 2027-04-10

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph
Help

Related People

Subjects
As Low As Reasonably Achievable | Coal Mining | Mining and Quarrying | Occupational and workplace health and safety | Other law and legal studies not elsewhere classified | Risk Management | So Far As Is Reasonably Practicable | Work Health and Safety |

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers
ACN 633 798 857