Data

Macroinvertebrate and ecosystem function data from replicated in-stream experiments in Tasmanian streams (2021–2023)

University of Tasmania, Australia
Bridget White ; Leon Barmuta
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=https://data.utas.edu.au/metadata/ead9f51d-003d-4858-98e0-eaca79e9a2dc&rft.title=Macroinvertebrate and ecosystem function data from replicated in-stream experiments in Tasmanian streams (2021–2023)&rft.identifier=https://data.utas.edu.au/metadata/ead9f51d-003d-4858-98e0-eaca79e9a2dc&rft.publisher=University of Tasmania, Australia&rft.description=This dataset is from an experiment testing stream community responses to catchment conversion to agriculture and short-term flow changes. We used a multiple before–after control–impact (mBACI) design across 8 Tasmanian streams (4 agricultural, 4 forested) during late summers of 2021–2023. Each stream contained three reaches (control, low flow, high flow). Flow was manipulated using temporary semi-porous weirs to create treatment conditions. Macroinvertebrate, physicochemical, and ecosystem function measurements were taken before, during, and after a disturbance (median 24.5 days, range 19–30), followed by a recovery (median 85 days, range 84–92). The sampling sequence was: Sample 1: pre-disturbance (baseline, all reaches), Samples 2–3: weekly during disturbance (weirs in place), Samples 4–6: monthly during recovery (post-weir removal). Macroinvertebrates were sampled with 0.25 m² box sampler; rocks scrubbed, fine material disturbed into 200 µm mesh net; preserved in 70% ethanol and identified to lowest practicable taxonomic level. Physicochemical variables were spot measures of temperature, pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen (Hach HQ40d), and flow (Schiltknecht MiniAir 2); continuous temperature logging at controls using HOBO loggers and Derwent Estuary Program data. Ecosystem functions were leaf decomposition (mesh bags with ~5 g dried green Eucalyptus viminalis leaves, 45 per site (3 × 15 per treatment/control), retrieved at 5 intervals; leaves dried (40 °C, ~48 h) and weighed; negative controls corrected for transport/set-up loss); cellulose decomposition (45 unbleached cotton strips (65 × 35 mm; EMPA, Switzerland) per site, on submerged ropes, retrieved at 5 intervals; tensile strength loss measured with Salter ElectroSamson scales); algal accrual (45 unglazed ceramic tiles (25 × 25 mm) per site, retrieved at 5 intervals; chlorophyll a extracted with 90% ethanol and quantified spectrophotometrically).&rft.creator=Bridget White &rft.creator=Leon Barmuta &rft.date=2025&rft_rights=Attribution - NonCommercial - Share Alike(BY - NC - SA) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/&rft_subject=Freshwater ecology&rft_subject=Ecology&rft_subject=BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=Expanding knowledge in the physical sciences&rft_subject=Expanding knowledge&rft_subject=EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE&rft_subject=macroinvertebrate&rft_subject=traits&rft_subject=river&rft_subject=field experiment&rft_subject=flow&rft_subject=ecosystem function&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Non-Commercial Licence view details
CC-BY-NC-SA

Attribution - NonCommercial - Share Alike(BY - NC - SA)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

Access:

Open

Full description

This dataset is from an experiment testing stream community responses to catchment conversion to agriculture and short-term flow changes. We used a multiple before–after control–impact (mBACI) design across 8 Tasmanian streams (4 agricultural, 4 forested) during late summers of 2021–2023. Each stream contained three reaches (control, low flow, high flow). Flow was manipulated using temporary semi-porous weirs to create treatment conditions. Macroinvertebrate, physicochemical, and ecosystem function measurements were taken before, during, and after a disturbance (median 24.5 days, range 19–30), followed by a recovery (median 85 days, range 84–92). The sampling sequence was: Sample 1: pre-disturbance (baseline, all reaches), Samples 2–3: weekly during disturbance (weirs in place), Samples 4–6: monthly during recovery (post-weir removal). Macroinvertebrates were sampled with 0.25 m² box sampler; rocks scrubbed, fine material disturbed into 200 µm mesh net; preserved in 70% ethanol and identified to lowest practicable taxonomic level. Physicochemical variables were spot measures of temperature, pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen (Hach HQ40d), and flow (Schiltknecht MiniAir 2); continuous temperature logging at controls using HOBO loggers and Derwent Estuary Program data. Ecosystem functions were leaf decomposition (mesh bags with ~5 g dried green Eucalyptus viminalis leaves, 45 per site (3 × 15 per treatment/control), retrieved at 5 intervals; leaves dried (40 °C, ~48 h) and weighed; negative controls corrected for transport/set-up loss); cellulose decomposition (45 unbleached cotton strips (65 × 35 mm; EMPA, Switzerland) per site, on submerged ropes, retrieved at 5 intervals; tensile strength loss measured with Salter ElectroSamson scales); algal accrual (45 unglazed ceramic tiles (25 × 25 mm) per site, retrieved at 5 intervals; chlorophyll a extracted with 90% ethanol and quantified spectrophotometrically).

Data time period: Summers of 2021-2022 and 2022-2023

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph