Data

Indicators of Catchment Condition in the Intensive Land Use Zone of Australia – Rivers through forests

data.gov.au
Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (Owned by)
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=http://data.gov.au/data/dataset/990ec9e4-b52f-4c8f-8aa4-289d3a23ed28&rft.title=Indicators of Catchment Condition in the Intensive Land Use Zone of Australia – Rivers through forests&rft.identifier=indicators-of-catchment-condition-in-the-intensive-land-use-zone-of-australia-rivers-through-forests&rft.publisher=data.gov.au&rft.description=pa_iccilr9ab__06921axx.xml - \n\nIt should be noted that this data is now somwhat dated!\n\nRivers through forests a Length of river within forests per total length of\nriver in the catchment. Riparian vegetation acts as a buffer between the land\ncomponent of the catchment and the stream or river.\n\nForests are a sub-set of riparian vegetation that is quantifiable from\nimagery. Rivers passing through forested areas is a surrogate for the\ncondition of the riparian zone. The length of watercourses draining through\nforested areas gives a general indication of water quality and quantity\nmaintenance and improvement, through filtering, shading and cooling, and by\nimproved aquatic biota condition. Included in this definition of forest are\nshrub, scrub and woodlands.\n\nThe most detailed river dataset available is the Topo250K dataset from AUSLIG\n(2000). This scale is appropriate to catchment scale analyses and has been\nused for this indicator.\n\nTree cover was defined from the Australian Land Cover Change (ALCC) dataset\n(2000), which is also at 1:250K. cell is defined as aforesta if it has\ngreater than 20% tree foliage cover and greater than 2 m tall. Topo250K rivers\nare industry-accepted data with a satisfactory data collection methodology.\n\nThe positional and attribute accuracy of the original data are sufficiently\nreliable for this analysis. The ALCC (2000) data has several gaps in the ILZ,\nnotably in southern Victoria and near the boundary with the ELZ in many areas.\nThese gaps have been filled using Atlas of Australian Vegetation (Carnahan,\n1990) data at 1:5M scale. Reliability is good, except where Carnahan data has\nbeen stitched in.\n\nBased on this indicator, relatively good riparian/catchment condition\ncorresponds with most coastal catchments, the higher rainfall areas of North\nQueensland and the forested inland areas of West Australia. Relatively poor\nconditions are indicated for coastal and near-coastal catchments in\nsouthwestern Victoria and southeastern South Australia, and most particularly,\nthe Wakefield, Brighton, Mambray Coast, Willochra Creek, Spencer Gulf and Eyre\nPeninsula (SA) Broken, Campaspe, Loddon, Avoca, Wimmera-Avon, Hopkins and Lake\nCorangamite in Victoria. In Western Australia, the Avon River features most\npoorly. For NSW, the Lachlan, Lake George, Murrumbidgee and Murray-Riverina a\nsouthern parts of the Murray-Darling Basin are indicated as having relatively\npoor condition. In Queensland the condition based on this indicator is\ngenerally good. Other catchments with an indicated relatively poor condition\noccur in drier inland areas where vegetation is generally much less dense\n(that is it is not naturally forested).\n\nData are available as:\n\n * continental maps at 5km (0.05 deg) cell resolution for the ILZ;\n * spatial averages over CRES defined catchments (CRES, 2000) in the ILZ;\n * spatial averages over the AWRC river basins in the ILZ.\n\nSee [further metadata](http://data.daff.gov.au/anrdl/metadata_files/pa_iccilr9ab\n__06921axx.xml) for more detail.\n\n&rft.creator=Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences&rft.date=2023&rft.coverage=Australia&rft_rights=notspecified&rft_subject=environment&rft_subject=indicator&rft_subject=land&rft_subject=landcover&rft_subject=landuse&rft_subject=water&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Other view details
Notspecified

notspecified

Brief description



It should be noted that this data is now somwhat dated!

Rivers through forests a Length of river within forests per total length of
river in the catchment. Riparian vegetation acts as a buffer between the land
component of the catchment and the stream or river.

Forests are a sub-set of riparian vegetation that is quantifiable from
imagery. Rivers passing through forested areas is a surrogate for the
condition of the riparian zone. The length of watercourses draining through
forested areas gives a general indication of water quality and quantity
maintenance and improvement, through filtering, shading and cooling, and by
improved aquatic biota condition. Included in this definition of forest are
shrub, scrub and woodlands.

The most detailed river dataset available is the Topo250K dataset from AUSLIG
(2000). This scale is appropriate to catchment scale analyses and has been
used for this indicator.

Tree cover was defined from the Australian Land Cover Change (ALCC) dataset
(2000), which is also at 1:250K. cell is defined as aforesta if it has
greater than 20% tree foliage cover and greater than 2 m tall. Topo250K rivers
are industry-accepted data with a satisfactory data collection methodology.

The positional and attribute accuracy of the original data are sufficiently
reliable for this analysis. The ALCC (2000) data has several gaps in the ILZ,
notably in southern Victoria and near the boundary with the ELZ in many areas.
These gaps have been filled using Atlas of Australian Vegetation (Carnahan,
1990) data at 1:5M scale. Reliability is good, except where Carnahan data has
been stitched in.

Based on this indicator, relatively good riparian/catchment condition
corresponds with most coastal catchments, the higher rainfall areas of North
Queensland and the forested inland areas of West Australia. Relatively poor
conditions are indicated for coastal and near-coastal catchments in
southwestern Victoria and southeastern South Australia, and most particularly,
the Wakefield, Brighton, Mambray Coast, Willochra Creek, Spencer Gulf and Eyre
Peninsula (SA) Broken, Campaspe, Loddon, Avoca, Wimmera-Avon, Hopkins and Lake
Corangamite in Victoria. In Western Australia, the Avon River features most
poorly. For NSW, the Lachlan, Lake George, Murrumbidgee and Murray-Riverina a
southern parts of the Murray-Darling Basin are indicated as having relatively
poor condition. In Queensland the condition based on this indicator is
generally good. Other catchments with an indicated relatively poor condition
occur in drier inland areas where vegetation is generally much less dense
(that is it is not naturally forested).

Data are available as:

* continental maps at 5km (0.05 deg) cell resolution for the ILZ;
* spatial averages over CRES defined catchments (CRES, 2000) in the ILZ;
* spatial averages over the AWRC river basins in the ILZ.

See [further metadata](http://data.daff.gov.au/anrdl/metadata_files/pa_iccilr9ab
__06921axx.xml) for more detail.

Full description

pa_iccilr9ab__06921axx.xml -

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

Spatial Coverage And Location

text: Australia

Subjects

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers