Data

Incentive Amounts-Prolific

University of Tasmania, Australia
Stuart Ferguson ; Rachel Breen ; Matthew Palmer
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=https://data.utas.edu.au/metadata/da3965b1-2f7c-4179-8fc2-a6cc1ff5da82&rft.title=Incentive Amounts-Prolific&rft.identifier=https://data.utas.edu.au/metadata/da3965b1-2f7c-4179-8fc2-a6cc1ff5da82&rft.publisher=University of Tasmania, Australia&rft.description=Studies demonstrate that financial incentive programmes increase smoking cessation. However, there is little guidance on which incentive magnitudes will ensure optimal enrolment and motivation levels. This study investigates current smokers’ perceptions of varying incentive magnitudes to identify whether there is evidence for optimal amount(s), and whether perceptions differ by income group. Studies 1 (N = 56) and 2 (N = 147) were conducted online via Prolific.co. Current smokers were randomly shown multiple hypothetical incentive programmes which differed only in the incentive amount offered. For each programme, smokers rated its appeal, their likelihood of enrolling, and predicted their motivation to quit if enrolled.&rft.creator=Stuart Ferguson &rft.creator=Rachel Breen &rft.creator=Matthew Palmer &rft.date=2020&rft.coverage=east=-3.17436218261719; north=55.4621173584655; projection=WGS84&rft_rights=Attribution - NonCommercial - Share Alike(BY - NC - SA) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/&rft_subject=Decision making&rft_subject=Cognitive and computational psychology&rft_subject=PSYCHOLOGY&rft_subject=Preventive medicine&rft_subject=Public health (excl. specific population health)&rft_subject=HEALTH&rft_subject=smoking&rft_subject=cessation&rft_subject=incentive&rft_subject=behaviour change&rft_subject=financial incentives&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data
Cite Saved to MyRDA Save to MyRDA

Licence & Rights:

Non-Commercial Licence view details
CC-BY-NC-SA

Attribution - NonCommercial - Share Alike(BY - NC - SA)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

Access:

Open

Full description

Studies demonstrate that financial incentive programmes increase smoking cessation. However, there is little guidance on which incentive magnitudes will ensure optimal enrolment and motivation levels. This study investigates current smokers’ perceptions of varying incentive magnitudes to identify whether there is evidence for optimal amount(s), and whether perceptions differ by income group.

Studies 1 (N = 56) and 2 (N = 147) were conducted online via Prolific.co. Current smokers were randomly shown multiple hypothetical incentive programmes which differed only in the incentive amount offered. For each programme, smokers rated its appeal, their likelihood of enrolling, and predicted their motivation to quit if enrolled.

Data time period: 2019-09 to 2019-12

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph
Help

Related People

-3.17436,55.46212

-3.1743621826172,55.462117358465

dcmiPoint: east=-3.17436218261719; north=55.4621173584655; projection=WGS84

Subjects
Cognitive and Computational Psychology | Decision Making | Health | Psychology | Preventive Medicine | Public Health (Excl. Specific Population Health) | behaviour change | cessation | financial incentives | incentive | smoking |

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers
Similar data you may be interested in: