Data

Important factors contributing to the burn severity of the 2021 Wooroloo bushfire

Edith Cowan University
David Blake (Aggregated by) Eddie van Etten (Aggregated by) Jarrad McKercher (Aggregated by)
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25958/12kx-e775&rft.title=Important factors contributing to the burn severity of the 2021 Wooroloo bushfire&rft.identifier=10.25958/12kx-e775&rft.publisher=Edith Cowan University&rft.description=Increases in consecutive days that meteorological, climatic and biophysical variables combine to influence fire is projecting an increase in fire size and intensity. This prompts investigation into the severity of recent fires to gain a better understanding of the factors that influence fire severity. Using a highly accurate spectral index, a geospatial analysis was undertaken to identify key variables that control the variability in fire severity of the 2021 Wooroloo Bushfire. Random Forest regression and General Additive Model (GAM) were utilised to determine variable importance in modelling fire severity and to create parsimonious models. Elevation and the Soil Dryness Index (SDI) were the two most influential factors in explaining the variability of the fire. Whilst a good variable importance was achieved, the parsimonious Random Forest and GAM models performed poorly, managing to explain 14% of variance (RF) and 17% of deviance (GAM). This work supports reports that the Wooroloo Bushfire was severe, unpredictable, and difficult to control. Further testing into fire behaviour variable interaction and the influence of fire on fire severity should be conducted to determine important variables in modelling fire severity.&rft.creator=David Blake&rft.creator=Eddie van Etten&rft.creator=Jarrad McKercher&rft.date=2024&rft.relation=https://ro.ecu.edu.au/datasets/132/&rft_rights= http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/&rft_subject=GIS&rft_subject=Fire severity&rft_subject=Spatial analysis&rft_subject=Spatial data&rft_subject=Random forest&rft_subject=Generalised additive model&rft_subject=Principal component analysis&rft_subject=Forest Management&rft_subject=Other Forestry and Forest Sciences&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details

Access:

Open

Contact Information

j.mckercher@ecu.edu.au

Full description

Increases in consecutive days that meteorological, climatic and biophysical variables combine to influence fire is projecting an increase in fire size and intensity. This prompts investigation into the severity of recent fires to gain a better understanding of the factors that influence fire severity. Using a highly accurate spectral index, a geospatial analysis was undertaken to identify key variables that control the variability in fire severity of the 2021 Wooroloo Bushfire. Random Forest regression and General Additive Model (GAM) were utilised to determine variable importance in modelling fire severity and to create parsimonious models. Elevation and the Soil Dryness Index (SDI) were the two most influential factors in explaining the variability of the fire. Whilst a good variable importance was achieved, the parsimonious Random Forest and GAM models performed poorly, managing to explain 14% of variance (RF) and 17% of deviance (GAM). This work supports reports that the Wooroloo Bushfire was severe, unpredictable, and difficult to control. Further testing into fire behaviour variable interaction and the influence of fire on fire severity should be conducted to determine important variables in modelling fire severity.

Notes

The data sheet provided contains the random point location extracted numerical data from a variety of environmental, meteorological and fire-related dataset. Together with this data set is the statistical analysis files used to implement the Random Forest Regression, Generalised Additive Models, and Principal Component Analysis in R.

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

116.31374,-31.80362

116.3137374,-31.8036199

Subjects

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers