Data

Impacts of the loss of environmental enrichment on grazing beef cattle

University of New England, Australia
Monk, Jessica ; Lee, Caroline ; Lea, Jim ; Kalinowski, Troy ; Belson, Sue ; Dyall, Tim ; Campbell, Dana ; Dickson, Emily
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25919/9nzf-pm47&rft.title=Impacts of the loss of environmental enrichment on grazing beef cattle&rft.identifier=10.25919/9nzf-pm47&rft.publisher=University of New England&rft.description=The aim was to investigate the effects of enrichment loss (specifically a grooming brush) on the behaviour and stress response of cattle when housed at pasture. Angus steers (n = 48) were housed at pasture in 8 groups (n = 6 /group) and tested over 2 cohorts. Cattle were provided with access to a grooming brush for 3 weeks, before access will be denied for a period of 7 days, using sheep panels to block access. Animals were then allowed access for up to 7 days to observe any rebound effects. Measures taken over the duration of the experiment include standing/lying time and number of steps (obtained automatically using IceQubes), coat cleanliness, ADG, and faecal cortisol concentrations (at least weekly, when cattle were health-check in nearby yards). Live behavioural observations consisted of four consecutive four-hour sessions a week - 2 in the morning (Cohort 1: 6:30-10:30; Cohort 2: 07:00-11:00) and 2 in the afternoon (Cohort 1: 15:45-19:45; Cohort 2: 15:00-19:00).&rft.creator=Monk, Jessica &rft.creator=Lee, Caroline &rft.creator=Lea, Jim &rft.creator=Kalinowski, Troy &rft.creator=Belson, Sue &rft.creator=Dyall, Tim &rft.creator=Campbell, Dana &rft.creator=Dickson, Emily &rft.date=2024&rft_rights= http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&rft_rights=&rft_rights=Rights holder: Emily Dickson&rft_subject=Animal Behaviour&rft_subject=BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=ZOOLOGY&rft_subject=Animal Welfare&rft_subject=ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND ANIMAL PRIMARY PRODUCTS&rft_subject=OTHER ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND ANIMAL PRIMARY PRODUCTS&rft_subject=Animal welfare&rft_subject=Animal production&rft_subject=AGRICULTURAL, VETERINARY AND FOOD SCIENCES&rft_subject=Animal behaviour&rft_subject=Zoology&rft_subject=BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=Animal welfare&rft_subject=Other animal production and animal primary products&rft_subject=ANIMAL PRODUCTION AND ANIMAL PRIMARY PRODUCTS&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Rights holder: Emily Dickson

Access:

Open view details

Open

Contact Information

emydickson@gmail.com

Full description

The aim was to investigate the effects of enrichment loss (specifically a grooming brush) on the behaviour and stress response of cattle when housed at pasture.
Angus steers (n = 48) were housed at pasture in 8 groups (n = 6 /group) and tested over 2 cohorts. Cattle were provided with access to a grooming brush for 3 weeks, before access will be denied for a period of 7 days, using sheep panels to block access. Animals were then allowed access for up to 7 days to observe any rebound effects. Measures taken over the duration of the experiment include standing/lying time and number of steps (obtained automatically using IceQubes), coat cleanliness, ADG, and faecal cortisol concentrations (at least weekly, when cattle were health-check in nearby yards). Live behavioural observations consisted of four consecutive four-hour sessions a week - 2 in the morning (Cohort 1: 6:30-10:30; Cohort 2: 07:00-11:00) and 2 in the afternoon (Cohort 1: 15:45-19:45; Cohort 2: 15:00-19:00).

Notes

Funding Source
This research was funded by Meat and Livestock Australia Ltd., project number P.PSH.0807. ED was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship.

Issued: 2024-01-30

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph
Identifiers