Data

IMOS - Animal Tracking Facility - Acoustic Tracking - Quality Controlled Detections (2007 - 2017) (SUPERSEDED BY ONGOING COLLECTION)

Integrated Marine Observing System
Hoenner, Xavier ; Huveneers, Charlie ; Steckenreuter, Andre ; Simpfendorfer, Colin ; Tattersall, Katherine ; Jaine, Fabrice ; Atkins, Natalia ; Babcock, Russ ; Brodie, Stephanie ; Burgess, Jonathan ; Campbell, Hamish ; Heupel, Michelle ; Pasquer, Benedicte ; Proctor, Roger ; Taylor, Matthew D. ; Udyawer, Vinay ; Harcourt, Robert
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=DOI: 10.4225/69/5979810a7dd6f&rft.title=IMOS - Animal Tracking Facility - Acoustic Tracking - Quality Controlled Detections (2007 - 2017) (SUPERSEDED BY ONGOING COLLECTION)&rft.identifier=DOI: 10.4225/69/5979810a7dd6f&rft.description=In its first decade, the Integrated Marine Observing System's Animal Tracking Facility (formerly known as the Australian Animal Tracking And Monitoring System (AATAMS)) established a permanent array of acoustic receivers around Australia to detect the movements of tagged marine animals in coastal waters. Simultaneously, the Animal Tracking Facility developed a centralised national database (https://animaltracking.aodn.org.au/) to encourage collaborative research across the Australian research community and provide unprecedented opportunities to quantify individual behaviour across a broad range of taxa. This static dataset presents the first 10 years (2007 - 2017) of quality-controlled animal detections collated via the IMOS Australian Animal Acoustic Telemetry Database. The dataset comprises 48.5 million valid detections collected at 1891 receiving stations around Australia, and consists of detection data for 3523 tags deployed on 117 species (fish, sharks, rays, reptiles, and mammals), with distances travelled ranging from a few to thousands of kilometres. To access subsequent additions in a dynamic database, please refer to the following metadata record: https://catalogue-imos.aodn.org.au/geonetwork/srv/api/records/541d4f15-122a-443d-ab4e-2b5feb08d6a0Maintenance and Update Frequency: notPlannedStatement: Historical duplicate transmitter IDs and tag transmission collisions caused by multiple transmitters within range of the same receiver or environmental noise can generate erroneous data thus entailing the development of statistical methods that automatically flag possible invalid detections. We developed a flexible quality control (QC) procedure for acoustic detection data that assesses, for each individual tag (only VEMCO tags were used in this study), the validity of detections based on a computed set of metrics and can be re-used for other acoustic telemetry networks. We applied this QC algorithm to the raw detections stored in the ATF back-end database. For researchers to re-use detection data easily we computed a field, 'Detection_QC', summarising the output of the five tests undertaken on individual detections, i.e. 'FDA_QC', 'Distance_QC', ?Velocity_QC?, 'DetectionDistribution_QC', and 'DistanceRelease_QC'. If five of these fields had a valid QC flag of 1, then 'Detection_QC' was assigned 1, meaning the detection is deemed 'valid'. If only four of these fields had a QC flag of 1 then 'Detection_QC' = 2, meaning the detection is 'likely to be valid'. Detections having three or less than three of these five fields with a QC flag of 1 were considered 'likely invalid' or 'invalid', respectively.&rft.creator=Hoenner, Xavier &rft.creator=Huveneers, Charlie &rft.creator=Steckenreuter, Andre &rft.creator=Simpfendorfer, Colin &rft.creator=Tattersall, Katherine &rft.creator=Jaine, Fabrice &rft.creator=Atkins, Natalia &rft.creator=Babcock, Russ &rft.creator=Brodie, Stephanie &rft.creator=Burgess, Jonathan &rft.creator=Campbell, Hamish &rft.creator=Heupel, Michelle &rft.creator=Pasquer, Benedicte &rft.creator=Proctor, Roger &rft.creator=Taylor, Matthew D. &rft.creator=Udyawer, Vinay &rft.creator=Harcourt, Robert &rft.date=2017&rft.coverage=140,-14 140,-10 144,-10 144,-14 140,-14&rft.coverage=118.00000000000001,-18 118.00000000000001,-16 120,-16 120,-18 118.00000000000001,-18&rft.coverage=120,-16 120,-12 122,-12 122,-16 120,-16&rft.coverage=146,-20 146,-18 148,-18 148,-20 146,-20&rft.coverage=112.00000000000001,-24 112.00000000000001,-20 114,-20 114,-24 112.00000000000001,-24&rft.coverage=114,-34 114,-32 116,-32 116,-34 114,-34&rft.coverage=136,-35.999999999999986 136,-34 140,-34 140,-35.999999999999986 136,-35.999999999999986&rft.coverage=150,-37.99999999999999 150,-32 152,-32 152,-24 150,-24 150,-22 154,-22 154,-34 152,-34 152,-37.99999999999999 150,-37.99999999999999&rft.coverage=144,-40 144,-35.999999999999986 146,-35.999999999999986 146,-37.99999999999999 148,-37.99999999999999 148,-40 144,-40&rft.coverage=150,-42.00000000000001 150,-44 146,-44 146,-42.00000000000001 148,-42.00000000000001 148,-40 150,-40 150,-42.00000000000001&rft.coverage=uplimit=150; downlimit=0&rft.coverage=uplimit=150; downlimit=0&rft_rights=&rft_rights=https://licensebuttons.net/l/by/4.0/88x31.png&rft_rights=WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related&rft_rights=License Graphic&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License&rft_rights=http://creativecommons.org/international/&rft_rights=WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related&rft_rights=WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related&rft_rights=License Text&rft_rights=Any users of IMOS data are required to clearly acknowledge the source of the material derived from IMOS in the format: Data was sourced from Australia's Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS) - IMOS is enabled by the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure strategy (NCRIS). The database is a centralised acoustic telemetry data repository maintained by the IMOS Animal Tracking Facility and the Australian Ocean Data Network (AODN, https://portal.aodn.org.au/).&rft_rights=This is the bibliographic reference for the dataset and this metadata record that describes it: Hoenner X, Huveneers C, Steckenreuter A, Simpfendorfer C, Tattersall K, Jaine F, Atkins N, Babcock R, Brodie S, Burgess J, Campbell H, Heupel M, Pasquer P, Proctor R, Taylor MD, Udyawer V, Harcourt R (2017), Australia's continental-scale acoustic tracking database and its automated quality control process. Australian Ocean Data Network - DOI: 10.4225/69/5979810a7dd6f (http://dx.doi.org/10.4225/69/5979810a7dd6f)&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0&rft_subject=oceans&rft_subject=MIGRATORY RATES/ROUTES&rft_subject=EARTH SCIENCE&rft_subject=BIOSPHERE&rft_subject=ECOLOGICAL DYNAMICS&rft_subject=SPECIES/POPULATION INTERACTIONS&rft_subject=FISH&rft_subject=BIOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION&rft_subject=ANIMALS/VERTEBRATES&rft_subject=Oceans | Marine Biology | Marine Mammals&rft_subject=Oceans | Marine Biology | Marine Reptiles&rft_subject=CRUSTACEANS&rft_subject=ANIMALS/INVERTEBRATES&rft_subject=ARTHROPODS&rft_subject=MOLLUSKS&rft_subject=Acoustic Tag&rft_subject=Acoustic Receiver&rft_subject=Acoustic Curtain&rft_subject=Acoustic Array&rft_subject=Cephalopods&rft_subject=Tags and Tracking Devices&rft_subject=Global / Oceans | Indian Ocean&rft_subject=Regional Seas | Timor Sea&rft_subject=Global / Oceans | Pacific Ocean&rft_subject=Regional Seas | Coral Sea&rft_subject=Regional Seas | Tasman Sea&rft_subject=Marine Features (Australia) | Bass Strait, TAS/VIC&rft_subject=Marine Features (Australia) | Great Australian Bight, SA/WA&rft_subject=States, Territories (Australia) | Queensland&rft_subject=States, Territories (Australia) | Northern Territory&rft_subject=Countries | Australia&rft_subject=States, Territories (Australia) | Victoria&rft_subject=States, Territories (Australia) | New South Wales&rft_subject=States, Territories (Australia) | Tasmania&rft_subject=States, Territories (Australia) | South Australia&rft_subject=States, Territories (Australia) | Western Australia&rft_subject=organism&rft_subject=Detection of acoustic tag&rft_subject=Biotic taxonomic identification&rft_subject=Pressure (measured variable) in the water body exerted by overlying sea water only&rft_subject=Temperature of the water body&rft_subject=tracking tags&rft_subject=Acoustic Telemetry Sub-Facility, Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS)&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

https://licensebuttons.net/l/by/4.0/88x31.png

WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related

License Graphic

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

http://creativecommons.org/international/

WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related

WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related

License Text

Any users of IMOS data are required to clearly acknowledge the source of the material derived from IMOS in the format: "Data was sourced from Australia's Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS) - IMOS is enabled by the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure strategy (NCRIS). The database is a centralised acoustic telemetry data repository maintained by the IMOS Animal Tracking Facility and the Australian Ocean Data Network (AODN, https://portal.aodn.org.au/)."

This is the bibliographic reference for the dataset and this metadata record that describes it: Hoenner X, Huveneers C, Steckenreuter A, Simpfendorfer C, Tattersall K, Jaine F, Atkins N, Babcock R, Brodie S, Burgess J, Campbell H, Heupel M, Pasquer P, Proctor R, Taylor MD, Udyawer V, Harcourt R (2017), Australia's continental-scale acoustic tracking database and its automated quality control process. Australian Ocean Data Network - DOI: 10.4225/69/5979810a7dd6f (http://dx.doi.org/10.4225/69/5979810a7dd6f)

Access:

Open

Brief description

In its first decade, the Integrated Marine Observing System's Animal Tracking Facility (formerly known as the Australian Animal Tracking And Monitoring System (AATAMS)) established a permanent array of acoustic receivers around Australia to detect the movements of tagged marine animals in coastal waters. Simultaneously, the Animal Tracking Facility developed a centralised national database (https://animaltracking.aodn.org.au/) to encourage collaborative research across the Australian research community and provide unprecedented opportunities to quantify individual behaviour across a broad range of taxa.

This static dataset presents the first 10 years (2007 - 2017) of quality-controlled animal detections collated via the IMOS Australian Animal Acoustic Telemetry Database. The dataset comprises 48.5 million valid detections collected at 1891 receiving stations around Australia, and consists of detection data for 3523 tags deployed on 117 species (fish, sharks, rays, reptiles, and mammals), with distances travelled ranging from a few to thousands of kilometres.

To access subsequent additions in a dynamic database, please refer to the following metadata record: https://catalogue-imos.aodn.org.au/geonetwork/srv/api/records/541d4f15-122a-443d-ab4e-2b5feb08d6a0

Lineage

Maintenance and Update Frequency: notPlanned
Statement: Historical duplicate transmitter IDs and tag transmission collisions caused by multiple transmitters within range of the same receiver or environmental noise can generate erroneous data thus entailing the development of statistical methods that automatically flag possible invalid detections. We developed a flexible quality control (QC) procedure for acoustic detection data that assesses, for each individual tag (only VEMCO tags were used in this study), the validity of detections based on a computed set of metrics and can be re-used for other acoustic telemetry networks. We applied this QC algorithm to the raw detections stored in the ATF back-end database. For researchers to re-use detection data easily we computed a field, 'Detection_QC', summarising the output of the five tests undertaken on individual detections, i.e. 'FDA_QC', 'Distance_QC', ?Velocity_QC?, 'DetectionDistribution_QC', and 'DistanceRelease_QC'. If five of these fields had a valid QC flag of 1, then 'Detection_QC' was assigned 1, meaning the detection is deemed 'valid'. If only four of these fields had a QC flag of 1 then 'Detection_QC' = 2, meaning the detection is 'likely to be valid'. Detections having three or less than three of these five fields with a QC flag of 1 were considered 'likely invalid' or 'invalid', respectively.

Notes

Credit
Australia's Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS) is enabled by the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS). It is operated by a consortium of institutions as an unincorporated joint venture, with the University of Tasmania as Lead Agent. It is operated by a consortium of institutions as an unincorporated joint venture, with the University of Tasmania as Lead Agent.
Credit
Ocean Tracking Network (OTN): in-kind support

Issued: 27 07 2017

Data time period: 18 11 2007 to 17 03 2017

This dataset is part of a larger collection

140,-14 140,-10 144,-10 144,-14 140,-14

142,-12

118,-18 118,-16 120,-16 120,-18 118,-18

119,-17

120,-16 120,-12 122,-12 122,-16 120,-16

121,-14

146,-20 146,-18 148,-18 148,-20 146,-20

147,-19

112,-24 112,-20 114,-20 114,-24 112,-24

113,-22

114,-34 114,-32 116,-32 116,-34 114,-34

115,-33

136,-36 136,-34 140,-34 140,-36 136,-36

138,-35

150,-38 150,-32 152,-32 152,-24 150,-24 150,-22 154,-22 154,-34 152,-34 152,-38 150,-38

152,-30

144,-40 144,-36 146,-36 146,-38 148,-38 148,-40 144,-40

146,-38

150,-42 150,-44 146,-44 146,-42 148,-42 148,-40 150,-40 150,-42

148,-42

text: uplimit=150; downlimit=0

Other Information
(Animal Tracking Facility - Data Access URL. This page is a point of access for all publicly accessible data (not quality-controlled) collected by the IMOS Animal Tracking Facility as well as the data entry and upload point for facility members.)

uri : https://animaltracking.aodn.org.au/

(Data paper in Scientific Data)

uri : https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata2017206

(OGC WFS help documentation)

uri : https://help.aodn.org.au/web-services/ogc-wfs/

global : a35d02d7-3bd2-40f8-b982-a0e30b64dc40

Identifiers