Data

Hyperspectral scan of simulated mangrove forest

James Cook University
Younes, Nicolas
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=https://researchdata.jcu.edu.au//published/5ce902373995b565ae438051b8ad2259&rft.title=Hyperspectral scan of simulated mangrove forest&rft.identifier=https://researchdata.jcu.edu.au//published/5ce902373995b565ae438051b8ad2259&rft.publisher=James Cook University&rft.description=Leaves were randomly selected and collected from healthy Ceriops australis mangrove trees in the Jack Barnes Bicentennial Mangrove Boardwalk site in Cairns (16° 52.976′S, 145° 45.663′E) (n = 96). We inspected the samples to avoid any obvious damage by insects, sunburn or disease and then placed them into coolers with ice on sealed plastic bags and taken to the remote sensing laboratory at James Cook University - Cairns. We selected this species because it is widespread throughout Australia and the size of their leaves (5.5–10 cm x 2.0–3.4 cm) was suitable for this experiment (Duke et al., 2006; Wightman et al., 2006). The leaves were divided into three groups of 32 leaves, where each group represented a different tidal height scenario. Each group of leaves was then divided into stacks of one, three, five and seven leaves and attached to a wooden platform as shown in Fig. 1. Stacks were arranged perpendicularly to each other to reduce the effects of the position of the sun, shadows or other factors when scanning. Furthermore, to reduce the effects of leaf dehydration and solar angle changes, all scenarios (i.e. 5, 15 and 30 cm of water) were scanned at the same time. Because our aim was to determine if water depth affects our ability to estimate FVC from remotely sensed data, we simulated low, transition and high tide by filling the containers with 5, 15 and 30 cm of water respectively. We decided to use 5, 15 and 30 cm of water for our experiment for several reasons: i) we were able to replicate realistic scenarios where mangrove mud is exposed and fully covered with water; ii) if 15 or 30 cm of water have an effect on the spectral reflectance of mangrove leaves, a more thorough experiment should be proposed; however, if there is no effect at these depths, no effect could be expected from other tidal heights; and iii) the containers used limited our ability to simulate the entire tidal range of the Cairns region (i.e. 3.6 m). We also collected mud from the study site and used it to create a 5 cm coating for the bottom of the containers. We did this for two main reasons: i) to better simulate the mangrove environment in our study site (turbid water) and ii) to prevent the bottom of the container from contributing to the spectral readings from the leaves. With the mud in place, water was poured into the container and left for 24 h to ensure any solids would settle, though water remained turbid throughout the experiment, as it is often the case in our study area. Lastly, our design allowed us to isolate the effects of tidal height on FVC estimation from the interference of stems, branches and dead leaves commonly found in mangrove ecosystems. Hyperspectral imagery acquisition and pre-processing: We obtained hyperspectral imagery over the leaf arrangement using a Headwall NANO Hyperspectral Scanner (Headwall Photonics Inc.), with a spectral resolution of 270 bands between 400–1000 nm (spectral bandwidth of 1.4–2 nm) and a Field of View equal to 15.3 degrees. The spectral range of this pushbroom scanner incorporates the visible (400–650 nm), red edge (650–750 nm) and NIR regions (750–1000 nm), which are often used to discriminate plant species. The scanner was turned on and left to warm up for 3 min before the first scan. Dark signal measurements were taken before and after the scans by completely covering the sensor and recording the signal in each spectral band. The samples were illuminated by direct sunlight and the scanner was positioned two meters above the samples, centered above the leaf arrangement. A 75% white Spectralon® panel was scanned alongside all images, thereby ensuring that any corrections due to changing illumination could be made during the image pre-processing stages. This set-up allowed us to i) reduce to the minimum any bidirectional reflectance distribution effects, ii) attain imagery of the mangrove leaves such that each pixel represented approximately 1 x 1 mm, and iii) isolate the effects of tidal height on mangrove leaves to assess FVC.&rft.creator=Younes, Nicolas &rft.date=2020&rft.relation=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2019.101924&rft.coverage=145.68737931883,-16.812523697789 145.68517921612,-16.81270110706 145.68314406456,-16.813520639847 145.68147307896,-16.814902067021 145.68032982703,-16.816710154412 145.67982621825,-16.818767904468 145.68001154934,-16.82087388558 145.6808676788,-16.822821951409 145.68231080273,-16.824421419252 145.6841996581,-16.825515732508 145.68634935057,-16.825997781534 145.68854945328,-16.825820384709 145.69058460484,-16.825000905101 145.69225559044,-16.823619551528 145.69339884237,-16.821811530046 145.69390245115,-16.819753813033 145.69371712006,-16.817647819476 145.6928609906,-16.815699700467 145.69141786667,-16.814100159024 145.6895290113,-16.813005779858 145.68737931883,-16.812523697789&rft.coverage=145.7676887386,-16.875697440157 145.76598680992,-16.875435037567 145.76428344376,-16.875688755108 145.76274537747,-16.876433755176 145.76152316769,-16.877597106766 145.76073645283,-16.879064926458 145.76046224203,-16.880693528585 145.76072737695,-16.882323492192 145.76150590433,-16.883795267049 145.76272161649,-16.884964790785 145.76425551106,-16.885717588733 145.76595743974,-16.885979977033 145.7676608059,-16.88572627332 145.76919887219,-16.884981309917 145.77042108197,-16.883818003824 145.77120779683,-16.882350221082 145.77148200763,-16.880721633245 145.77121687271,-16.879091655809 145.77043834533,-16.877619844288 145.76922263317,-16.876450275054 145.7676887386,-16.875697440157&rft.coverage=Jack Barnes Bicentennial Mangrove Boardwalk, Cairns&rft.coverage=James Cook University, Smithfield, QLD&rft_rights=&rft_rights=CC BY 4.0: Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0&rft_subject=fractional vegetation cover&rft_subject=beta regression&rft_subject=linear regression&rft_subject=tidal influence&rft_subject=tidal height&rft_subject=water effect size&rft_subject=remote sensing&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

CC BY 4.0: Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Access:

Open view details

Open: free access under license

Contact Information



Full description

Leaves were randomly selected and collected from healthy Ceriops australis mangrove trees in the Jack Barnes Bicentennial Mangrove Boardwalk site in Cairns (16° 52.976′S, 145° 45.663′E) (n = 96). We inspected the samples to avoid any obvious damage by insects, sunburn or disease and then placed them into coolers with ice on sealed plastic bags and taken to the remote sensing laboratory at James Cook University - Cairns. We selected this species because it is widespread throughout Australia and the size of their leaves (5.5–10 cm x 2.0–3.4 cm) was suitable for this experiment (Duke et al., 2006; Wightman et al., 2006). The leaves were divided into three groups of 32 leaves, where each group represented a different tidal height scenario. Each group of leaves was then divided into stacks of one, three, five and seven leaves and attached to a wooden platform as shown in Fig. 1. Stacks were arranged perpendicularly to each other to reduce the effects of the position of the sun, shadows or other factors when scanning. Furthermore, to reduce the effects of leaf dehydration and solar angle changes, all scenarios (i.e. 5, 15 and 30 cm of water) were scanned at the same time. Because our aim was to determine if water depth affects our ability to estimate FVC from remotely sensed data, we simulated low, transition and high tide by filling the containers with 5, 15 and 30 cm of water respectively. We decided to use 5, 15 and 30 cm of water for our experiment for several reasons: i) we were able to replicate realistic scenarios where mangrove mud is exposed and fully covered with water; ii) if 15 or 30 cm of water have an effect on the spectral reflectance of mangrove leaves, a more thorough experiment should be proposed; however, if there is no effect at these depths, no effect could be expected from other tidal heights; and iii) the containers used limited our ability to simulate the entire tidal range of the Cairns region (i.e. 3.6 m). We also collected mud from the study site and used it to create a 5 cm coating for the bottom of the containers. We did this for two main reasons: i) to better simulate the mangrove environment in our study site (turbid water) and ii) to prevent the bottom of the container from contributing to the spectral readings from the leaves. With the mud in place, water was poured into the container and left for 24 h to ensure any solids would settle, though water remained turbid throughout the experiment, as it is often the case in our study area. Lastly, our design allowed us to isolate the effects of tidal height on FVC estimation from the interference of stems, branches and dead leaves commonly found in mangrove ecosystems.

Hyperspectral imagery acquisition and pre-processing: We obtained hyperspectral imagery over the leaf arrangement using a Headwall NANO Hyperspectral Scanner (Headwall Photonics Inc.), with a spectral resolution of 270 bands between 400–1000 nm (spectral bandwidth of 1.4–2 nm) and a Field of View equal to 15.3 degrees. The spectral range of this pushbroom scanner incorporates the visible (400–650 nm), red edge (650–750 nm) and NIR regions (750–1000 nm), which are often used to discriminate plant species. The scanner was turned on and left to warm up for 3 min before the first scan. Dark signal measurements were taken before and after the scans by completely covering the sensor and recording the signal in each spectral band. The samples were illuminated by direct sunlight and the scanner was positioned two meters above the samples, centered above the leaf arrangement. A 75% white Spectralon® panel was scanned alongside all images, thereby ensuring that any corrections due to changing illumination could be made during the image pre-processing stages. This set-up allowed us to i) reduce to the minimum any bidirectional reflectance distribution effects, ii) attain imagery of the mangrove leaves such that each pixel represented approximately 1 x 1 mm, and iii) isolate the effects of tidal height on mangrove leaves to assess FVC.

Created: 2020-08-18

Data time period: 17 04 2017 to 17 04 2017

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

145.68738,-16.81252 145.68518,-16.8127 145.68314,-16.81352 145.68147,-16.8149 145.68033,-16.81671 145.67983,-16.81877 145.68001,-16.82087 145.68087,-16.82282 145.68231,-16.82442 145.6842,-16.82552 145.68635,-16.826 145.68855,-16.82582 145.69058,-16.825 145.69226,-16.82362 145.6934,-16.82181 145.6939,-16.81975 145.69372,-16.81765 145.69286,-16.8157 145.69142,-16.8141 145.68953,-16.81301 145.68738,-16.81252

145.6868643347,-16.819260739662

145.76769,-16.8757 145.76599,-16.87544 145.76428,-16.87569 145.76275,-16.87643 145.76152,-16.8776 145.76074,-16.87906 145.76046,-16.88069 145.76073,-16.88232 145.76151,-16.8838 145.76272,-16.88496 145.76426,-16.88572 145.76596,-16.88598 145.76766,-16.88573 145.7692,-16.88498 145.77042,-16.88382 145.77121,-16.88235 145.77148,-16.88072 145.77122,-16.87909 145.77044,-16.87762 145.76922,-16.87645 145.76769,-16.8757

145.76597212483,-16.8807075073

text: Jack Barnes Bicentennial Mangrove Boardwalk, Cairns

text: James Cook University, Smithfield, QLD

Subjects

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers
  • Local : researchdata.jcu.edu.au//published/5ce902373995b565ae438051b8ad2259
  • Local : a9358406259ebb407aa27150540ed5fd