grant

Which Heart failure Intervention is most Cost effective in reducing Hospital care (WHICH? II) Trial: A multicentre, randomised trial of standard versus intensified management of metropolitan and regional-dwelling patients with heart failure [ 2013 - 2016 ]

Also known as: The WHICH? Trial of standard versus intensified heart failure care

Research Grant

[Cite as http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1049133]

Researchers: Prof Simon Stewart (Principal investigator) ,  A/Pr Amanda Rischbieth A/Pr Chiew Wong A/Pr Melinda Carrington Prof John Horowitz
View all 7 related researchers

Brief description Chronic heart failure (CHF) management programs are now the gold-standard to cost-effectively care for thousands of Australians hospitalised with CHF each year. We’ve shown that home-based management is most cost-effective in reducing hospital stay in CHF. The Which Intervention is most Cost-effective in reducing Hospital care (WHICH? II) Trial, a multicentre, randomised study, will determine if more intensive care (via home visits and remote care contacts) further improves poor outcomes in CHF.

Funding Amount $AUD 1,891,210.73

Funding Scheme Project Grants

Notes Standard Project Grant

Click to explore relationships graph
Identifiers
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]]