Data

Data from: Classification of Camellia (Theaceae) Species Using Leaf Architecture Variations and Pattern Recognition Techniques

RMIT University, Australia
Dr Nitin Mantri (Associated with, Aggregated by)
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=https://figshare.com/articles/Classification_of_Camellia_Theaceae_Species_Using_Leaf_Architecture_Variations_and_Pattern_Recognition_Techniques/129994&rft.title=Data from: Classification of Camellia (Theaceae) Species Using Leaf Architecture Variations and Pattern Recognition Techniques&rft.identifier=739c4a943965f3041cb4b8b5afe02b93&rft.publisher=RMIT University, Australia&rft.description=Attached file provides supplementary data for linked article. Leaf characters have been successfully utilized to classify Camellia (Theaceae) species; however, leaf characters combined with supervised pattern recognition techniques have not been previously explored. We present results of using leaf morphological and venation characters of 93 species from five sections of genus Camellia to assess the effectiveness of several supervised pattern recognition techniques for classifications and compare their accuracy. Clustering approach, Learning Vector Quantization neural network (LVQ-ANN), Dynamic Architecture for Artificial Neural Networks (DAN2), and C-support vector machines (SVM) are used to discriminate 93 species from five sections of genus Camellia (11 in sect. Furfuracea, 16 in sect. Paracamellia, 12 in sect. Tuberculata, 34 in sect. Camellia, and 20 in sect. Theopsis). DAN2 and SVM show excellent classification results for genus Camellia with DAN2's accuracy of 97.92% and 91.11% for training and testing data sets respectively. The RBF-SVM results of 97.92% and 97.78% for training and testing offer the best classification accuracy. A hierarchical dendrogram based on leaf architecture data has confirmed the morphological classification of the five sections as previously proposed. The overall results suggest that leaf architecture-based data analysis using supervised pattern recognition techniques, especially DAN2 and SVM discrimination methods, is excellent for identification of Camellia species.&rft.creator=Dr Nitin Mantri&rft.date=2018&rft.relation=http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029704&rft_rights=Further information about rights and usage of ACS publications and supplementary data can be found here: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.&rft_rights=CC BY-NC: Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 AU http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/au&rft_subject=Camellia&rft_subject=DAN2&rft_subject=Leaf architecture&rft_subject=LVQ&rft_subject=Plant identification&rft_subject=Supervised pattern recognition &rft_subject=SVM&rft_subject=Taxonomy&rft_subject=Plant Biology not elsewhere classified&rft_subject=BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=PLANT BIOLOGY&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Other view details
Unknown

CC BY-NC: Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 AU
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/au

Further information about rights and usage of ACS publications and supplementary data can be found here: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Access:

Other view details

Data available in link

Contact Information


Figshare

Full description

Attached file provides supplementary data for linked article. Leaf characters have been successfully utilized to classify Camellia (Theaceae) species; however, leaf characters combined with supervised pattern recognition techniques have not been previously explored. We present results of using leaf morphological and venation characters of 93 species from five sections of genus Camellia to assess the effectiveness of several supervised pattern recognition techniques for classifications and compare their accuracy. Clustering approach, Learning Vector Quantization neural network (LVQ-ANN), Dynamic Architecture for Artificial Neural Networks (DAN2), and C-support vector machines (SVM) are used to discriminate 93 species from five sections of genus Camellia (11 in sect. Furfuracea, 16 in sect. Paracamellia, 12 in sect. Tuberculata, 34 in sect. Camellia, and 20 in sect. Theopsis). DAN2 and SVM show excellent classification results for genus Camellia with DAN2's accuracy of 97.92% and 91.11% for training and testing data sets respectively. The RBF-SVM results of 97.92% and 97.78% for training and testing offer the best classification accuracy. A hierarchical dendrogram based on leaf architecture data has confirmed the morphological classification of the five sections as previously proposed. The overall results suggest that leaf architecture-based data analysis using supervised pattern recognition techniques, especially DAN2 and SVM discrimination methods, is excellent for identification of Camellia species.

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Subjects

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers
  • Local : 739c4a943965f3041cb4b8b5afe02b93