Data

Fatal attraction - the predation of pollinators leads to reproductive conflict in pollen limited populations of Drosera hookeri (Droseraceae) - Dataset

University of New England, Australia
Gross, Caroline ; Whitehead, Joshua ; Mackay, Keith ; Water, Wendy ; Silveira, de
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25952/z8jk-jf44&rft.title=Fatal attraction - the predation of pollinators leads to reproductive conflict in pollen limited populations of Drosera hookeri (Droseraceae) - Dataset&rft.identifier=10.25952/z8jk-jf44&rft.publisher=University of New England&rft.description=Pollinator-prey conflict in carnivorous plants occurs when plants that benefit from pollinators are pollen-limited and pollinators are snared by trap-leaves. To date a strong pollinator-prey conflict has not been found and is attributed to spatial and/or cue differences between flowers and traps abating conflict. Here we test whether pollinator-prey conflict occurs for Drosera hookeri (Droseraceae), which produces entomophilous flowers adjacent to leaf-traps. We also test the hypothesis that flowers have a dual role of pollinator attraction and deception by tumbling pollinators and other floral visitors into leaf-traps. From 2007-2021, in a drought-prone habitat in eastern Australia, pollinator diversity and visitation rates were scored at flowers using camcorders while pan-traps provided an estimate of pollinator abundance in the community. Hand-pollination experiments were used to determine pollinator dependence and pollen limitation. We also measured arthropod abundance in trap-leaves before, during and after flowering. In a paired experiment we compared leaf captures between plants with and without flowers to determine if flowers are complicit in the leaf captures of pollinators. Although self-compatible, with a delayed selfing-mechanism, outcrossed flowers produced more seed than self-pollinated flowers, indicating that pollinators are beneficial. Plants were pollen-limited in both years tested. Flies (non-pollinating and pollinating) were the most common prey with the greatest numbers during peak flowering. Pollinators, predominantly Melangyna virdiceps (Syriphidae, Diptera), contributed c. 57% of prey captures, and experimentally we show that they are not attracted to plants without flowers. Pollinators are often deposited into trap-leaves from flowers, which tip under their weight, to nearby leaf traps. A strong pollinator-prey conflict was detected with an overlap in prey and pollinators in a pollen and pollinator-limited system. Flowers attract pollinators and non-pollinators to plants. Leaf entrapment for pollinators occurs as a mishap in foraging rather than attraction to trap-leaves. The flowers in D. hookeri have the dual role of pollination and prey provision.&rft.creator=Gross, Caroline &rft.creator=Whitehead, Joshua &rft.creator=Mackay, Keith &rft.creator=Water, Wendy &rft.creator=Silveira, de &rft.date=2023&rft_rights= http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/&rft_rights=&rft_rights=Rights holder: Caroline Gross&rft_subject=Terrestrial Ecology&rft_subject=BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=ECOLOGY&rft_subject=Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity of environments not elsewhere classified&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENT&rft_subject=FLORA, FAUNA AND BIODIVERSITY&rft_subject=Conservation and biodiversity&rft_subject=Environmental management&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=Terrestrial biodiversity&rft_subject=Terrestrial systems and management&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Non-Derivative Licence view details

Access:

Other

Contact Information

cgross@une.edu.au

Full description

Pollinator-prey conflict in carnivorous plants occurs when plants that benefit from pollinators are pollen-limited and pollinators are snared by trap-leaves. To date a strong pollinator-prey conflict has not been found and is attributed to spatial and/or cue differences between flowers and traps abating conflict. Here we test whether pollinator-prey conflict occurs for Drosera hookeri (Droseraceae), which produces entomophilous flowers adjacent to leaf-traps. We also test the hypothesis that flowers have a dual role of pollinator attraction and deception by tumbling pollinators and other floral visitors into leaf-traps. From 2007-2021, in a drought-prone habitat in eastern Australia, pollinator diversity and visitation rates were scored at flowers using camcorders while pan-traps provided an estimate of pollinator abundance in the community. Hand-pollination experiments were used to determine pollinator dependence and pollen limitation. We also measured arthropod abundance in trap-leaves before, during and after flowering. In a paired experiment we compared leaf captures between plants with and without flowers to determine if flowers are complicit in the leaf captures of pollinators. Although self-compatible, with a delayed selfing-mechanism, outcrossed flowers produced more seed than self-pollinated flowers, indicating that pollinators are beneficial. Plants were pollen-limited in both years tested. Flies (non-pollinating and pollinating) were the most common prey with the greatest numbers during peak flowering. Pollinators, predominantly Melangyna virdiceps (Syriphidae, Diptera), contributed c. 57% of prey captures, and experimentally we show that they are not attracted to plants without flowers. Pollinators are often deposited into trap-leaves from flowers, which tip under their weight, to nearby leaf traps. A strong pollinator-prey conflict was detected with an overlap in prey and pollinators in a pollen and pollinator-limited system. Flowers attract pollinators and non-pollinators to plants. Leaf entrapment for pollinators occurs as a mishap in foraging rather than attraction to trap-leaves. The flowers in D. hookeri have the dual role of pollination and prey provision.

Notes

Funding Source
Our 2007 work was funded by a Marsden Fund - Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden grant El-Sayed, AM, Suckling, M, Newstrom,L. Gross CL & J Byers (2005). Do carnivorous plants actively separate reproduction and feeding? ; The University of New England provided resources and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Foundation of Brazil (CAPES) provided financial support for the last author.

Issued: 2023-04-04

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph
Identifiers