Data

Ecophysiological measurements from thermal tolerance testing of giant kelp (NESP MaC 1.28)

Australian Ocean Data Network
Layton, Cayne ; Smid, Eva ; Johnson, Craig
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25959/61A2-A148&rft.title=Ecophysiological measurements from thermal tolerance testing of giant kelp (NESP MaC 1.28)&rft.identifier=10.25959/61A2-A148&rft.description=This record described kelp growth and ecophysiological data relevant to the thermal tolerance of specific warm-tolerant and 'normal' family-lines of giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) from Tasmania, Australia. For habitat restoration to be effective, the cause of habitat decline must be understood and overcome. But this is problematic when climate change is driving habitat loss, since it cannot be reversed or ameliorated prior to restoration. A previous NESP project, led by this team, identified warmwater-tolerant strains of giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) from remnant patches in eastern Tasmania, where the species has experienced severe declines over the past half-century due to climate change and ocean-warming. While these strains have high potential to assist with ‘future-proofing’ of kelp forest restoration activities, it is still unclear what the physiological mechanisms are that provide their improved thermal tolerance. Here we cultivated the warm-tolerant giant kelp strains, along with giant kelp strains of normal tolerance, at both cool (16 °C) and warm temperatures (20 °C). We then harvested the juvenile kelp, and examined a suite of physiological traits that may be responsible for their differences in thermal tolerance, including nutrient usage (carbon and nitrogen content), cellular membrane processes (fatty acid contents), and photosynthesis (PAM fluorometry and photosynthetic pigments). The cultivation trials again illustrated the improved ability of the warm-tolerant strains to develop at stressful warm temperatures relative to normal giant kelp. For the first time, we also demonstrate that their improved thermal performance may extend to the development and fertilisation of the earlier kelp ‘gametophyte’ life-stage. Despite the clear differences in growth between the two test groups, the physiological assessments illustrated a complex pattern of responses, some of which are contrary to expected based on prior knowledge of thermal performance in kelps. Nonetheless, our results indicate that the warm-tolerant strains of giant kelp have a greater capacity to alter the composition of their fatty acids and may be more efficient users of nitrogen (a key nutrient for growth and development). This new information will help inform ongoing kelp breeding and selection programs for future-proofing kelp restoration in Australia and globally. This improved understanding of the physiology of kelp thermal tolerance might also help with identifying individuals and populations of Macrocystis, and other kelps, that may be resilient to (or especially threatened by) ocean warming and climate change.Maintenance and Update Frequency: none-plannedStatement: Building on a prior successful NESP Marine Biodiversity Hub Project E7 and leveraging pre-existing kelp cultures (Layton & Johnson 2021), this project explored potential mechanism(s) underpinning the thermal tolerance of previously identified warm-tolerant giant kelp strains, including their nutrient usage (carbon and nitrogen content), cellular membrane processes (fatty acid contents), and photosynthesis (PAM fluorometry and photosynthetic pigments).&rft.creator=Layton, Cayne &rft.creator=Smid, Eva &rft.creator=Johnson, Craig &rft.date=2015&rft.coverage=146.92794719670587,-43.52282776329059 146.91168059318488,-43.450507889727305 146.9002217131616,-43.41900971152893 147.0153991286669,-43.43571777065853 147.04814793647813,-43.35424482393944 146.96661718763312,-43.324825137270246 147.05782559497527,-43.21560999670396 147.12379780892184,-43.21019048420346 147.1032309702332,-43.24184742691716 147.15466008549458,-43.23744577520233 147.1697558589458,-43.27783320503835 147.22707735383688,-43.272781835413355 147.25315445021772,-43.22863741758272 147.24043351739294,-43.12154222998987 147.29416080877434,-43.087510781197594 147.2499106558522,-43.07510492944892 147.25448657189781,-43.02056551788427 147.3554852112735,-42.92633937606132 147.43435341647705,-42.90391188682406 147.48869088977278,-42.90733895043218 147.61725288920957,-42.86380419920437 147.67610052911618,-42.89614458710299 147.80894784396787,-42.88515510822162 147.95526070601682,-42.67031692528582 147.90227245051324,-42.572026013289815 147.90799093992996,-42.54268117809386 147.89241835582254,-42.520914874022196 147.92157357256235,-42.49265345389375 147.9826690832117,-42.48850045213413 148.00336835156827,-42.44436265151512 147.97090385992522,-42.440772250339016 147.96157281363446,-42.358147496010076 147.9942557389113,-42.30409784174196 148.0082875685165,-42.23721824062926 148.07461569725672,-42.16625961418981 148.0737041129545,-42.127566570041154 148.0418279550961,-42.11572286112113 148.0587963427771,-42.06584162479113 148.1272476017955,-42.0436816038229 148.14947749199268,-42.00200677019626 148.24158054130896,-41.981532482538 148.23172283044437,-42.02443289246395 148.16302055085782,-42.07232566209956 148.22369672472416,-42.064787937713106 148.2516981553457,-42.10983936949128 148.3039595365035,-42.12382905866406 148.3385250386997,-42.11819444631659 148.27743380342736,-42.03306523926931 148.31227115988622,-41.91169402196152 148.2478476855223,-41.82821734165695 148.27488560768472,-41.734665881125466 148.30990726580774,-41.57741235359718 148.24341425266573,-41.48706840428337 148.2745240307595,-41.36958952203877 148.26546413546157,-41.34466284561381 148.2382687698879,-41.3148328405631 148.2833347571933,-41.26005488922169 148.24702718095966,-41.19173405078578 148.27546286002303,-41.161504213448666 148.26183624424732,-41.10635176282357 148.25462914302057,-41.04018925503004 148.2954344293555,-40.97236452220488 148.23811403343598,-40.901284400054976 148.2155151190276,-40.85066975850254 148.31192165635946,-40.84665683334612 148.43221656414323,-40.875359295395135 148.47529783672587,-40.98993310482888 148.3949230701436,-41.128477291193974 148.47551345728027,-41.256667756411794 148.46702366381112,-41.362396175043386 148.3871478635831,-41.4715914459884 148.44051923747293,-41.60834146328786 148.3978824476169,-41.805823906148305 148.4437325133449,-41.911314070088224 148.41200362216944,-42.009298809692254 148.46621081068042,-42.09217459807917 148.47785858520558,-42.18266665764009 148.43948337675647,-42.28152766337092 148.46344994955564,-42.36331447258481 148.39240948121267,-42.431620368784934 148.2813158088776,-42.448515107386235 148.14323502967295,-42.375270047274796 148.1219659364789,-42.40552167158785 148.12870038821245,-42.48228845614727 148.21894073922385,-42.531420751466435 148.29076376523562,-42.647326550379944 148.18451173432913,-42.7809415481139 148.0879768025875,-42.81766720747561 148.12109534957074,-42.96770949419778 148.08323683131482,-43.033393094115986 148.149630126729,-43.065071372345926 148.17688289782757,-43.11625027463043 148.12892956334872,-43.19456605418003 148.12654093161882,-43.266996989519384 148.02690626071546,-43.33413540652373 147.89724754613746,-43.297319042439824 147.76528374954546,-43.32876116949234 147.6188550458238,-43.45124482928543 147.4857494798547,-43.43538641095405 147.43366980851488,-43.54411091019028 147.3714428293232,-43.60157687307417 147.28854882067162,-43.61941447979439 147.10942392757227,-43.587574893766316 146.92794719670587,-43.52282776329059&rft_rights=This dataset is hosted by the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, on behalf of NESP Marine and Coastal Hub Project 1.28.&rft_rights=Data was sourced from the NESP Marine and Coastal Hub – the Marine and Coastal Hub is supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program (NESP), administered by the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (DAWE).&rft_rights= http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&rft_rights=http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png&rft_rights=WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related&rft_rights=License Graphic&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License&rft_rights=http://creativecommons.org/international/&rft_rights=WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related&rft_rights=WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related&rft_rights=License Text&rft_rights=Cite data as: Layton, C., Eva, S., & Johnson, C. (2022). NESP MaC Project 1.28 - Future-proofing restoration & thermal physiology of kelp [Data set]. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania (UTAS). https://doi.org/10.25959/61A2-A148&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0&rft_subject=biota&rft_subject=ecophysiology&rft_subject=future-proof&rft_subject=Macrocystis pyrifera&rft_subject=giant kelp&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

This dataset is hosted by the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, on behalf of NESP Marine and Coastal Hub Project 1.28.

Data was sourced from the NESP Marine and Coastal Hub – the Marine and Coastal Hub is supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program (NESP), administered by the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (DAWE).

http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png

WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related

License Graphic

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

http://creativecommons.org/international/

WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related

WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related

License Text

Cite data as: Layton, C., Eva, S., & Johnson, C. (2022). NESP MaC Project 1.28 - Future-proofing restoration & thermal physiology of kelp [Data set]. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania (UTAS). https://doi.org/10.25959/61A2-A148

Access:

Open

Brief description

This record described kelp growth and ecophysiological data relevant to the thermal tolerance of specific warm-tolerant and 'normal' family-lines of giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) from Tasmania, Australia.

For habitat restoration to be effective, the cause of habitat decline must be understood and overcome. But this is problematic when climate change is driving habitat loss, since it cannot be reversed or ameliorated prior to restoration.

A previous NESP project, led by this team, identified warmwater-tolerant strains of giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) from remnant patches in eastern Tasmania, where the species has experienced severe declines over the past half-century due to climate change and ocean-warming. While these strains have high potential to assist with ‘future-proofing’ of kelp forest restoration activities, it is still unclear what the physiological mechanisms are that provide their improved thermal tolerance.

Here we cultivated the warm-tolerant giant kelp strains, along with giant kelp strains of normal tolerance, at both cool (16 °C) and warm temperatures (20 °C). We then harvested the juvenile kelp, and examined a suite of physiological traits that may be responsible for their differences in thermal tolerance, including nutrient usage (carbon and nitrogen content), cellular membrane processes (fatty acid contents), and photosynthesis (PAM fluorometry and photosynthetic pigments).

The cultivation trials again illustrated the improved ability of the warm-tolerant strains to develop at stressful warm temperatures relative to normal giant kelp. For the first time, we also demonstrate that their improved thermal performance may extend to the development and fertilisation of the earlier kelp ‘gametophyte’ life-stage. Despite the clear differences in growth between the two test groups, the physiological assessments illustrated a complex pattern of responses, some of which are contrary to expected based on prior knowledge of thermal performance in kelps. Nonetheless, our results indicate that the warm-tolerant strains of giant kelp have a greater capacity to alter the composition of their fatty acids and may be more efficient users of nitrogen (a key nutrient for growth and development).

This new information will help inform ongoing kelp breeding and selection programs for future-proofing kelp restoration in Australia and globally. This improved understanding of the physiology of kelp thermal tolerance might also help with identifying individuals and populations of Macrocystis, and other kelps, that may be resilient to (or especially threatened by) ocean warming and climate change.

Lineage

Maintenance and Update Frequency: none-planned
Statement: Building on a prior successful NESP Marine Biodiversity Hub Project E7 and leveraging pre-existing kelp cultures (Layton & Johnson 2021), this project explored potential mechanism(s) underpinning the thermal tolerance of previously identified warm-tolerant giant kelp strains, including their nutrient usage (carbon and nitrogen content), cellular membrane processes (fatty acid contents), and photosynthesis (PAM fluorometry and photosynthetic pigments).

Data time period: 2021-07-31 to 2022-07-31

This dataset is part of a larger collection

-43.61941,86 -40.84666,86

-42.23303565657,90

Subjects

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Other Information
(DATA ACCESS - kelp ecophysiology measurements [.xlsx direct download])

uri : http://data.imas.utas.edu.au/attachments/18979422-134c-4a18-a2f1-2c4cde0ed0f8/NESP2_Project1.28_DATA.xlsx

global : 77199302-f841-4d07-902b-b45c633276ab

Identifiers