Data

Ecophysiological measurements from thermal tolerance testing of giant kelp (NESP MaC 1.28)

University of Tasmania, Australia
Layton, Cayne ; Johnson, Craig ; Smid, Eva
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25959/61A2-A148&rft.title=Ecophysiological measurements from thermal tolerance testing of giant kelp (NESP MaC 1.28)&rft.identifier=10.25959/61A2-A148&rft.description=This record described kelp growth and ecophysiological data relevant to the thermal tolerance of specific warm-tolerant and 'normal' family-lines of giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) from Tasmania, Australia.Australia’s giant kelp forests are listed as a Threatened Ecological Community under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Habitat restoration is a potential tool for the conservation and management of giant kelp ecosystems. For habitat restoration to be effective, the cause of habitat decline must be understood and overcome. This is problematic when climate change is driving habitat loss since it cannot be reversed or ameliorated prior to restoration. A previous NESP project led by this team (Project E7, Marine Biodiversity Hub) identified warm-tolerant strains of giant kelp from remnant patches in eastern Tasmania, where the species has experienced precipitous declines due to ocean-warming. These strains have high potential to assist with ‘future-proofing’ kelp forest restoration, however it is still unclear what the physiological mechanisms are that provide their improved thermal tolerance.This work cultivated the warm-tolerant strains of giant kelp previously identified, along with giant kelp strains of normal tolerance, at both cool (16 °C) and warm temperatures (20 °C). The juvenile kelp was then harvested, and a suite of physiological traits that may be responsible for their differences in thermal tolerance were examined. These included nutrient usage (carbon and nitrogen content), cellular membrane processes (fatty acid contents), and photosynthesis (PAM fluorometry and photosynthetic pigments).The cultivation trials again illustrated the improved ability of the warm-tolerant strains to develop at stressful warm temperatures relative to normal giant kelp. This work demonstrated for their first time that the improved thermal performance of these strains may extend to the development and fertilisation of the earlier kelp ‘gametophyte’ life-stage. Despite the clear differences in growth between the two test groups, the physiological assessments illustrated a complex pattern of responses, some of which are contrary to expected based on prior knowledge of thermal performance in kelps. Nonetheless, these results indicate that the warm-tolerant strains of giant kelp have a greater capacity to alter the composition of their fatty acids and may be more efficient users of nitrogen (a key nutrient for growth and development).This new information will help inform ongoing kelp breeding and selection programs for future-proofing kelp restoration in Australia and globally. The improved understanding of the physiology of kelp thermal tolerance might also help with identifying individuals and populations of Macrocystis, and other kelps, that may be resilient to (or especially threatened by) ocean warming and climate change.Maintenance and Update Frequency: none-plannedStatement: Building on a prior successful NESP Marine Biodiversity Hub Project E7 and leveraging pre-existing kelp cultures (Layton & Johnson 2021), this project explored potential mechanism(s) underpinning the thermal tolerance of previously identified warm-tolerant giant kelp strains, including their nutrient usage (carbon and nitrogen content), cellular membrane processes (fatty acid contents), and photosynthesis (PAM fluorometry and photosynthetic pigments).&rft.creator=Layton, Cayne &rft.creator=Johnson, Craig &rft.creator=Smid, Eva &rft.date=2015&rft.coverage=-43.52282776329059,146.92794719670587 -43.450507889727305,146.91168059318488 -43.41900971152893,146.9002217131616 -43.43571777065853,147.0153991286669 -43.35424482393944,147.04814793647813 -43.324825137270246,146.96661718763312 -43.21560999670396,147.05782559497527 -43.21019048420346,147.12379780892184 -43.24184742691716,147.1032309702332 -43.23744577520233,147.15466008549458 -43.27783320503835,147.1697558589458 -43.272781835413355,147.22707735383688 -43.22863741758272,147.25315445021772 -43.12154222998987,147.24043351739294 -43.087510781197594,147.29416080877434 -43.07510492944892,147.2499106558522 -43.02056551788427,147.25448657189781 -42.92633937606132,147.3554852112735 -42.90391188682406,147.43435341647705 -42.90733895043218,147.48869088977278 -42.86380419920437,147.61725288920957 -42.89614458710299,147.67610052911618 -42.88515510822162,147.80894784396787 -42.67031692528582,147.95526070601682 -42.572026013289815,147.90227245051324 -42.54268117809386,147.90799093992996 -42.520914874022196,147.89241835582254 -42.49265345389375,147.92157357256235 -42.48850045213413,147.9826690832117 -42.44436265151512,148.00336835156827 -42.440772250339016,147.97090385992522 -42.358147496010076,147.96157281363446 -42.30409784174196,147.9942557389113 -42.23721824062926,148.0082875685165 -42.16625961418981,148.07461569725672 -42.127566570041154,148.0737041129545 -42.11572286112113,148.0418279550961 -42.06584162479113,148.0587963427771 -42.0436816038229,148.1272476017955 -42.00200677019626,148.14947749199268 -41.981532482538,148.24158054130896 -42.02443289246395,148.23172283044437 -42.07232566209956,148.16302055085782 -42.064787937713106,148.22369672472416 -42.10983936949128,148.2516981553457 -42.12382905866406,148.3039595365035 -42.11819444631659,148.3385250386997 -42.03306523926931,148.27743380342736 -41.91169402196152,148.31227115988622 -41.82821734165695,148.2478476855223 -41.734665881125466,148.27488560768472 -41.57741235359718,148.30990726580774 -41.48706840428337,148.24341425266573 -41.36958952203877,148.2745240307595 -41.34466284561381,148.26546413546157 -41.3148328405631,148.2382687698879 -41.26005488922169,148.2833347571933 -41.19173405078578,148.24702718095966 -41.161504213448666,148.27546286002303 -41.10635176282357,148.26183624424732 -41.04018925503004,148.25462914302057 -40.97236452220488,148.2954344293555 -40.901284400054976,148.23811403343598 -40.85066975850254,148.2155151190276 -40.84665683334612,148.31192165635946 -40.875359295395135,148.43221656414323 -40.98993310482888,148.47529783672587 -41.128477291193974,148.3949230701436 -41.256667756411794,148.47551345728027 -41.362396175043386,148.46702366381112 -41.4715914459884,148.3871478635831 -41.60834146328786,148.44051923747293 -41.805823906148305,148.3978824476169 -41.911314070088224,148.4437325133449 -42.009298809692254,148.41200362216944 -42.09217459807917,148.46621081068042 -42.18266665764009,148.47785858520558 -42.28152766337092,148.43948337675647 -42.36331447258481,148.46344994955564 -42.431620368784934,148.39240948121267 -42.448515107386235,148.2813158088776 -42.375270047274796,148.14323502967295 -42.40552167158785,148.1219659364789 -42.48228845614727,148.12870038821245 -42.531420751466435,148.21894073922385 -42.647326550379944,148.29076376523562 -42.7809415481139,148.18451173432913 -42.81766720747561,148.0879768025875 -42.96770949419778,148.12109534957074 -43.033393094115986,148.08323683131482 -43.065071372345926,148.149630126729 -43.11625027463043,148.17688289782757 -43.19456605418003,148.12892956334872 -43.266996989519384,148.12654093161882 -43.33413540652373,148.02690626071546 -43.297319042439824,147.89724754613746 -43.32876116949234,147.76528374954546 -43.45124482928543,147.6188550458238 -43.43538641095405,147.4857494798547 -43.54411091019028,147.43366980851488 -43.60157687307417,147.3714428293232 -43.61941447979439,147.28854882067162 -43.587574893766316,147.10942392757227 -43.52282776329059,146.92794719670587&rft_rights=This dataset is hosted by the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, on behalf of NESP Marine and Coastal Hub Project 1.28.&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&rft_rights=Cite data as: Layton, C., Eva, S., & Johnson, C. (2022). Ecophysiological measurements from thermal tolerance testing of giant kelp [Data set]. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies. https://doi.org/10.25959/61A2-A148&rft_subject=biota&rft_subject=National Environmental Science Program (NESP) Marine and Coastal Hub&rft_subject=ecophysiology&rft_subject=future-proof&rft_subject=giant kelp&rft_subject=Macrocystis pyrifera&rft_subject=KELP FOREST&rft_subject=RECLAMATION/REVEGETATION/RESTORATION&rft_subject=MARINE ECOSYSTEMS&rft_subject=ENDANGERED SPECIES&rft_subject=MACROALGAE (SEAWEEDS)&rft_subject=Conservation and Biodiversity&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT&rft_subject=Phycology (incl. Marine Grasses)&rft_subject=BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=PLANT BIOLOGY&rft_subject=Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology)&rft_subject=ECOLOGY&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This dataset is hosted by the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, on behalf of NESP Marine and Coastal Hub Project 1.28.

Cite data as: Layton, C., Eva, S., & Johnson, C. (2022). Ecophysiological measurements from thermal tolerance testing of giant kelp [Data set]. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies. https://doi.org/10.25959/61A2-A148

Access:

Open

Full description

This record described kelp growth and ecophysiological data relevant to the thermal tolerance of specific warm-tolerant and 'normal' family-lines of giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) from Tasmania, Australia.

Australia’s giant kelp forests are listed as a Threatened Ecological Community under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Habitat restoration is a potential tool for the conservation and management of giant kelp ecosystems. For habitat restoration to be effective, the cause of habitat decline must be understood and overcome. This is problematic when climate change is driving habitat loss since it cannot be reversed or ameliorated prior to restoration.

A previous NESP project led by this team (Project E7, Marine Biodiversity Hub) identified warm-tolerant strains of giant kelp from remnant patches in eastern Tasmania, where the species has experienced precipitous declines due to ocean-warming. These strains have high potential to assist with ‘future-proofing’ kelp forest restoration, however it is still unclear what the physiological mechanisms are that provide their improved thermal tolerance.

This work cultivated the warm-tolerant strains of giant kelp previously identified, along with giant kelp strains of normal tolerance, at both cool (16 °C) and warm temperatures (20 °C). The juvenile kelp was then harvested, and a suite of physiological traits that may be responsible for their differences in thermal tolerance were examined. These included nutrient usage (carbon and nitrogen content), cellular membrane processes (fatty acid contents), and photosynthesis (PAM fluorometry and photosynthetic pigments).

The cultivation trials again illustrated the improved ability of the warm-tolerant strains to develop at stressful warm temperatures relative to normal giant kelp. This work demonstrated for their first time that the improved thermal performance of these strains may extend to the development and fertilisation of the earlier kelp ‘gametophyte’ life-stage. Despite the clear differences in growth between the two test groups, the physiological assessments illustrated a complex pattern of responses, some of which are contrary to expected based on prior knowledge of thermal performance in kelps. Nonetheless, these results indicate that the warm-tolerant strains of giant kelp have a greater capacity to alter the composition of their fatty acids and may be more efficient users of nitrogen (a key nutrient for growth and development).

This new information will help inform ongoing kelp breeding and selection programs for future-proofing kelp restoration in Australia and globally. The improved understanding of the physiology of kelp thermal tolerance might also help with identifying individuals and populations of Macrocystis, and other kelps, that may be resilient to (or especially threatened by) ocean warming and climate change.

Lineage

Maintenance and Update Frequency: none-planned
Statement: Building on a prior successful NESP Marine Biodiversity Hub Project E7 and leveraging pre-existing kelp cultures (Layton & Johnson 2021), this project explored potential mechanism(s) underpinning the thermal tolerance of previously identified warm-tolerant giant kelp strains, including their nutrient usage (carbon and nitrogen content), cellular membrane processes (fatty acid contents), and photosynthesis (PAM fluorometry and photosynthetic pigments).

Notes

Credit
The data collections described in this record are funded by the Australian Government Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) through the NESP Marine and Coastal Hub. In addition to NESP (DCCEEW) funding, this project is matched by an equivalent amount of in-kind support and co-investment from project partners and collaborators.

Data time period: 2021-07-31 to 2022-07-31

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

-43.61941,86 -40.84666,86

-42.23303565657,90

Other Information
(DATA ACCESS - kelp ecophysiology measurements [.xlsx direct download])

url : https://data.imas.utas.edu.au/attachments/18979422-134c-4a18-a2f1-2c4cde0ed0f8/NESP2_Project1.28_DATA.xlsx

Layton C and Johnson CR (2021). Assessing the feasibility of restoring giant kelp forests in Tasmania. Report to the National Environmental Science Program, Marine Biodiversity Hub. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania. (Associated Publication)

url : https://www.nespmarinecoastal.edu.au/historical-publications/assessing-the-feasibility-of-restoring-giant-kelp-forests-in-tasmania-final-report/

global : 77199302-f841-4d07-902b-b45c633276ab

local : 00arpt780

local : 0000-0002-3390-6437

local : 00arpt780

local : 0000-0002-9511-905X

local : 00arpt780

local : 00arpt780

local : 0000-0002-3390-6437

NESP MaC Project 1.28 - Future-proofing the restoration and thermal physiology of giant kelp, 2021-2022 (IMAS)

doi : 10.71676/15ff1fad

Identifiers
ACN 633 798 857