Data

Dataset for mark-release-recapture experiments detailing the place and time of feeding by Anopheles farauti in Haleta village, Solomon Islands

James Cook University
Russell, Tanya ; Burkot, Thomas
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.4225/28/56BD124CC9260&rft.title=Dataset for mark-release-recapture experiments detailing the place and time of feeding by Anopheles farauti in Haleta village, Solomon Islands&rft.identifier=10.4225/28/56BD124CC9260&rft.publisher=James Cook University&rft.description=Background: In the 1970s, Anopheles farauti in the Solomon Island responded to indoor residual spraying with DDT by increasingly feeding more often outdoors and earlier in the evening. Although long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are now the primary malaria vector control intervention, only a small proportion of An. farauti still seeks blood meals indoors and late at night where they are vulnerable to being killing by contract with the insecticides in LLINs. The effectiveness of LLINs and indoor residual spraying (IRS) in controlling malaria transmission where the vectors are most exophagic and early biting will depend on whether the predominant outdoor or early biting phenotypes are associated with a subpopulation of the vectors present.Methods: Mark-release-recapture experiments were conducted in the Solomon Islands to determine if individual Anopheles farauti repeat the same behaviours over successive feeding cycles. The two behavioural phenotypes examined were those on which the WHO recommended malaria vector control strategies, LLINs and IRS, depend: indoor and late night biting.Results: Evidence was not found for subpopulations of An. farauti regarding time (early evening or late night) or location (indoor or outdoor) of blood feeding. Individual An. farauti did not consistently repeat the behavioural phenotype expressed for their original blood meal (e.g., while most mosquitoes that fed early and outdoors and would repeat those behaviours, some fed late at night and indoors in the next feeding cycle).Conclusions: The finding that An. farauti is a homogeneous population is significant as all individual vectors can potentially be exposed to the insecticides used in insecticide treated nets (ITNs) or IRS. Across the multiple feeding cycles required to complete the extrinsic incubation period, individual females may enter houses late at night and potentially be exposed to insecticides in ITNs and IRS. This may explain, in part, the degree of control that LLINs and IRS have exerted against a predominantly outdoor feeding mosquito such as An. farauti. These findings may be applicable to the outdoor feeding vectors that dominate transmission in much of the malaria endemic world and justifies continued distribution of LLINs. However, the population-level tendency of mosquitoes to feed outdoors and early in the evening will require complementary interventions if malaria control can be accelerated towards elimination.e-recapture experiments were conducted in the Solomon Islands to determine if individual Anopheles farauti repeat the same behaviours over successive feeding cycles. The two behavioural phenotypes examined were those on which the WHO recommended malaria vector control strategies, LLINs and IRS, depend: indoor and late night biting.&rft.creator=Russell, Tanya &rft.creator=Burkot, Thomas &rft.date=2016&rft.relation=http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1194-9&rft.coverage=160.11349469601,-9.0952366841948 160.11263755378,-9.0953170419885 160.11184751119,-9.0956550078392 160.11120190312,-9.0962174986317 160.11076392618,-9.0969494529523 160.1105764526,-9.0977792212165 160.11065783361,-9.0986255795418 160.11100010307,-9.0994056806469 160.11156975725,-9.1000431634628 160.11231103444,-9.1004756276282 160.11315137325,-9.1006607413314 160.11400851548,-9.1005803847379 160.11479855807,-9.1002424235397 160.11544416615,-9.0996799390748 160.11588214309,-9.09894799034 160.11606961666,-9.0981182247864 160.11598823565,-9.0972718652618 160.1156459662,-9.0964917595034 160.11507631201,-9.095854270359 160.11433503483,-9.0954218006085 160.11349469601,-9.0952366841948&rft.coverage=Nggela Sule Island, Solomon Islands&rft.coverage=Haleta, Solomon Islands&rft_rights=&rft_rights=CC BY: Attribution 3.0 AU http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au&rft_subject=behavioural polymorphism&rft_subject=Anopheles farauti&rft_subject=Solomon Islands&rft_subject=mark-release-recapture&rft_subject=heterogenous population&rft_subject=insect&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details

Access:

Open view details

Open: free access under license

Brief description

Background: In the 1970s, Anopheles farauti in the Solomon Island responded to indoor residual spraying with DDT by increasingly feeding more often outdoors and earlier in the evening. Although long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are now the primary malaria vector control intervention, only a small proportion of An. farauti still seeks blood meals indoors and late at night where they are vulnerable to being killing by contract with the insecticides in LLINs. The effectiveness of LLINs and indoor residual spraying (IRS) in controlling malaria transmission where the vectors are most exophagic and early biting will depend on whether the predominant outdoor or early biting phenotypes are associated with a subpopulation of the vectors present.

Methods: Mark-release-recapture experiments were conducted in the Solomon Islands to determine if individual Anopheles farauti repeat the same behaviours over successive feeding cycles. The two behavioural phenotypes examined were those on which the WHO recommended malaria vector control strategies, LLINs and IRS, depend: indoor and late night biting.

Results: Evidence was not found for subpopulations of An. farauti regarding time (early evening or late night) or location (indoor or outdoor) of blood feeding. Individual An. farauti did not consistently repeat the behavioural phenotype expressed for their original blood meal (e.g., while most mosquitoes that fed early and outdoors and would repeat those behaviours, some fed late at night and indoors in the next feeding cycle).

Conclusions: The finding that An. farauti is a homogeneous population is significant as all individual vectors can potentially be exposed to the insecticides used in insecticide treated nets (ITNs) or IRS. Across the multiple feeding cycles required to complete the extrinsic incubation period, individual females may enter houses late at night and potentially be exposed to insecticides in ITNs and IRS. This may explain, in part, the degree of control that LLINs and IRS have exerted against a predominantly outdoor feeding mosquito such as An. farauti. These findings may be applicable to the outdoor feeding vectors that dominate transmission in much of the malaria endemic world and justifies continued distribution of LLINs. However, the population-level tendency of mosquitoes to feed outdoors and early in the evening will require complementary interventions if malaria control can be accelerated towards elimination.e-recapture experiments were conducted in the Solomon Islands to determine if individual Anopheles farauti repeat the same behaviours over successive feeding cycles. The two behavioural phenotypes examined were those on which the WHO recommended malaria vector control strategies, LLINs and IRS, depend: indoor and late night biting.

Notes

This dataset consists of a description of data archiving and data dictionaries in PDF format and a spreadsheet in MS Excel (.xlsx) and Open Document (.ods) formats

Created: 2016-02-05

Data time period: 23 11 2011 to 16 05 2012

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

160.11349,-9.09524 160.11264,-9.09532 160.11185,-9.09566 160.1112,-9.09622 160.11076,-9.09695 160.11058,-9.09778 160.11066,-9.09863 160.111,-9.09941 160.11157,-9.10004 160.11231,-9.10048 160.11315,-9.10066 160.11401,-9.10058 160.1148,-9.10024 160.11544,-9.09968 160.11588,-9.09895 160.11607,-9.09812 160.11599,-9.09727 160.11565,-9.09649 160.11508,-9.09585 160.11434,-9.09542 160.11349,-9.09524

160.11332303463,-9.0979487127631

text: Nggela Sule Island, Solomon Islands

text: Haleta, Solomon Islands

Subjects

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers
  • DOI : 10.4225/28/56BD124CC9260
  • Local : researchdata.jcu.edu.au//published/afb4460bcf233166937254b460a096ab
  • Local : f57c58476c2c5832eb5b87d184e43253