Data

Data from : Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): The sSFR-M* relation part I - σsSFR-M* as a function of sample, SFR indicator, and environment

The University of Western Australia
Davies, Luke ; Lagos Urbina, Claudia ; Katsianis, A. ; Robotham, Aaron ; Cortese, Luca ; Driver, Simon ; Bremer, Malcom N. ; Brown, Michael J. I. ; Brough, Sarah ; Cluver, Michelle E. ; Grootes, Meiert W. ; Holwerda, Benne W. ; Owers, Matthew ; Phillipps, S.
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.1093/mnras/sty2957&rft.title=Data from : Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): The sSFR-M* relation part I - σsSFR-M* as a function of sample, SFR indicator, and environment&rft.identifier=10.1093/mnras/sty2957&rft.publisher=SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS)&rft.description=Recently, a number of studies have proposed that the dispersion along the star formation rate (SFR) - stellar mass relation (σsSFR-M*) - is indicative of variations in star formation history driven by feedback processes. They found a `U'-shaped dispersion and attribute the increased scatter at low and high stellar masses to stellar and active galactic nuclei feedback, respectively. However, measuring σsSFR and the shape of the σsSFR-M* relation is problematic and can vary dramatically depending on the sample selected, chosen separation of passive/star-forming systems, and method of deriving SFRs (i.e. H α emission versus spectral energy distribution fitting). As such, any astrophysical conclusions drawn from measurements of σsSFR must consider these dependencies. Here, we use the Galaxy And Mass Assembly survey to explore how σsSFR varies with SFR indicator for a variety of selections for disc-like `main-sequence' star-forming galaxies including colour, SFR, visual morphology, bulge-to-total mass ratio, Sérsic index, and mixture modelling. We find that irrespective of sample selection and/or SFR indicator, the dispersion along the sSFR-M* relation does follow a `U'-shaped distribution. This suggests that the shape is physical and not an artefact of sample selection or method. We then compare the σsSFR-M* relation to state-of-the-art hydrodynamical and semi-analytic models and find good agreement with our observed results. Finally, we find that for group satellites this `U'-shaped distribution is not observed due to additional high scatter population at intermediate stellar masses. &rft.creator=Davies, Luke &rft.creator=Lagos Urbina, Claudia &rft.creator=Katsianis, A. &rft.creator=Robotham, Aaron &rft.creator=Cortese, Luca &rft.creator=Driver, Simon &rft.creator=Bremer, Malcom N. &rft.creator=Brown, Michael J. I. &rft.creator=Brough, Sarah &rft.creator=Cluver, Michelle E. &rft.creator=Grootes, Meiert W. &rft.creator=Holwerda, Benne W. &rft.creator=Owers, Matthew &rft.creator=Phillipps, S. &rft.date=2019&rft.relation=http://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/eed9d89a-733a-45e7-ad05-ba4b1b364b1d&rft_subject=galaxies: evolution&rft_subject=galaxies: general&rft_subject=galaxies: groups&rft_subject=Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Access:

Open

Full description

Recently, a number of studies have proposed that the dispersion along the star formation rate (SFR) - stellar mass relation (σsSFR-M*) - is indicative of variations in star formation history driven by feedback processes. They found a `U'-shaped dispersion and attribute the increased scatter at low and high stellar masses to stellar and active galactic nuclei feedback, respectively. However, measuring σsSFR and the shape of the σsSFR-M* relation is problematic and can vary dramatically depending on the sample selected, chosen separation of passive/star-forming systems, and method of deriving SFRs (i.e. H α emission versus spectral energy distribution fitting). As such, any astrophysical conclusions drawn from measurements of σsSFR must consider these dependencies. Here, we use the Galaxy And Mass Assembly survey to explore how σsSFR varies with SFR indicator for a variety of selections for disc-like `main-sequence' star-forming galaxies including colour, SFR, visual morphology, bulge-to-total mass ratio, Sérsic index, and mixture modelling. We find that irrespective of sample selection and/or SFR indicator, the dispersion along the sSFR-M* relation does follow a `U'-shaped distribution. This suggests that the shape is physical and not an artefact of sample selection or method. We then compare the σsSFR-M* relation to state-of-the-art hydrodynamical and semi-analytic models and find good agreement with our observed results. Finally, we find that for group satellites this `U'-shaped distribution is not observed due to additional high scatter population at intermediate stellar masses.

Notes

External Organisations
Universidad de Chile; Shanghai Jiao Tong University; University of Bristol; Monash University (Australia); Australian Astronomical Observatory; ARC Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics; University of New South Wales; University of Sydney; ARC Centre of Excellence for Astrophysics in Three Dimensions (ASTRO3D); University of the Western Cape; Swinburne University of Technology; University of Cape Town; European Space Agency - ESA; ESTEC; ESA/ESTEC SCI-S; University of Sussex; Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics; Netherlands eScience Center; University of Louisville; Leiden University; Macquarie University; The University of Western Australia
Associated Persons
A. Katsianis (Creator); Malcom N. Bremer (Creator); Michael J. I. Brown (Creator); Sarah Brough (Creator); Michelle E. Cluver (Creator); Meiert W. Grootes (Creator); Benne W. Holwerda (Creator); Matthew Owers (Creator); S. Phillipps (Creator)

Issued: 2019-02

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph
Subjects

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers