Data

Data from: You are what you eat: diet-induced chemical crypsis in a coral-feeding reef fish

James Cook University
Brooker, Rohan ; Munday, Philip ; Jones, Geoffrey
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=https://researchdata.jcu.edu.au//published/2d814cff3571ecc839e4f781f9c00690&rft.title=Data from: You are what you eat: diet-induced chemical crypsis in a coral-feeding reef fish&rft.identifier=https://researchdata.jcu.edu.au//published/2d814cff3571ecc839e4f781f9c00690&rft.publisher=James Cook University&rft.description=Abstract [Related Publication]: The vast majority of research into the mechanisms of camouflage has focused on forms that confound visual perception. However, many organisms primarily interact with their surroundings using chemosensory systems and may have evolved mechanisms to 'blend in' with chemical components of their habitat. One potential mechanism is 'chemical crypsis' via the sequestration of dietary elements, causing a consumer's odour to chemically match that of its prey. Here, we test the potential for chemical crypsis in the coral-feeding filefish, Oxymonacanthus longirostris, by examining olfactory discrimination in obligate coral-dwelling crabs and a predatory cod. The crabs, which inhabit the corals consumed by O. longirostris, were used as a bioassay to determine the effect of coral diet on fish odour. Crabs preferred the odour of filefish fed their preferred coral over the odour of filefish fed a non-preferred coral, suggesting coral-specific dietary elements that influence odour are sequestered. Crabs also exhibited a similar preference for the odour of filefish fed their preferred coral and odour directly from that coral, suggesting a close chemical match. In behavioural trials, predatory cod were less attracted to filefish odour when presented alongside the coral it had been fed on, suggesting diet can reduce detectability. This is, we believe, the first evidence of diet-induced chemical crypsis in a vertebrate.Data consists of 1 file: Data_RSPB_RMB_etal.xlsxDryad data package includes README file for interpretation of data:Sheet A) crab bioassaysCrab spp.:  Trapezia cymodoce; Tetralia glaberimma Trial: 1-7Crab no.: 1-16Side: L- Left; R- Right; C- Centre Habitat selected:Trials 1,2,3,4,6,7: PD- Pocillopora damicornis; AS- Acropora spathulata; NC- No choice Trial 5: F- Fish; C- Coral; NC- No choiceKeyTrialCrab spp.Odours1Both        A. spathulata coral odour vs. P. damicornis coral odour2Both        A. spathulata fish odor vs. P. damicornis fish odour3Both        A. spathulata fish odour vs.A. spathulata fish odour4Both        P. damicornis fish odour vs. P. damicornis fish odour5T. cymodoceP. damicornis coral odour vs. P. damicornis fish odour5T. glaberimmaA. spathulata coral odour vs.A. spathulata fish odour6Both        P. damicornis fish odour vs. A. spathulata coral odour7Both        A. spathulata fish odour vs. P. damicornis coral odour Sheet B) Predators- activity levelFish: 21-27Treatment: 1-6KeyTreatment   Corals                     Diet of associated fish1     a) Pocillopora b) Pocillopora   a) Pocillopora b) Pocillopora2     a) Acropora    b) Acropora     a) Acropora    b) Acropora3     a) Pocillopora b) Pocillopora   a) Pocillopora b) Acropora4     a) Acropora    b) Acropora     a) Pocillopora b) Acropora5     a) No coral    b ) No coral     a) Pocillopora b) Acropora6     a) Acropora    b) Acropora     a) Pocillopora b) PocilloporaNote: % data logit-transformed prior to analysis Sheet C) Predators - detectabilityFish:1-18Note: only active predators were included in this analysis (i.e. 19-27 excluded) Key 1Treatments   Corals                       Diet of associated fish3      a) Pocillopora  b) Pocillopora   a) Pocillopora   b) Acropora4      a) Acropora     b) Acropora      a) Pocillopora   b) Acropora Key 2A     Proportion of exposed time spent next to fish whose diet differed from associated coralB     Proportion of exposed time spent next to fish whose diet matched associated coralC     Proportion of exposed time not next to either fish The full methodology is available in the publication shown in the Related Publications link below.  &rft.creator=Brooker, Rohan &rft.creator=Munday, Philip &rft.creator=Jones, Geoffrey &rft.date=2014&rft.relation=http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1887&rft.coverage=145.45204658507,-14.660693513054 145.44822725272,-14.661278739777 145.44478178322,-14.662977125022 145.44204744315,-14.665622395822 145.44029188875,-14.668955585975 145.43968696593,-14.672650396403 145.44029188875,-14.676345144447 145.44204744315,-14.679678171273 145.44478178322,-14.68232324019 145.44822725272,-14.684021462108 145.45204658507,-14.684606626446 145.45586591743,-14.684021462108 145.45931138693,-14.68232324019 145.462045727,-14.679678171273 145.4638012814,-14.676345144447 145.46440620421,-14.672650396403 145.4638012814,-14.668955585975 145.462045727,-14.665622395822 145.45931138693,-14.662977125022 145.45586591743,-14.661278739777 145.45204658507,-14.660693513054&rft.coverage=Experiments were conducted at Lizard Island Research Station, Great Barrier Reef, Australia (14°40′ S; 145°27′ E)&rft_rights=&rft_rights=CC 0: Public Domain Dedication 1.0 Universal http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0&rft_subject=camouflage&rft_subject=predator-prey interactions&rft_subject=olfaction&rft_subject=coral reefs&rft_subject=Oxymonacanthus longirostris&rft_subject=Acropora spathulata&rft_subject=Pocillopora damicornis&rft_subject=Trapezia cymodoce&rft_subject=Tetralia glaberimma&rft_subject=Cephalopholis spp.&rft_subject=ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Other view details
Unknown/other

CC 0: Public Domain Dedication 1.0 Universal
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0

Access:

Open view details

Open: free access under license

Contact Information



Full description

Abstract [Related Publication]: The vast majority of research into the mechanisms of camouflage has focused on forms that confound visual perception. However, many organisms primarily interact with their surroundings using chemosensory systems and may have evolved mechanisms to 'blend in' with chemical components of their habitat. One potential mechanism is 'chemical crypsis' via the sequestration of dietary elements, causing a consumer's odour to chemically match that of its prey. Here, we test the potential for chemical crypsis in the coral-feeding filefish, Oxymonacanthus longirostris, by examining olfactory discrimination in obligate coral-dwelling crabs and a predatory cod. The crabs, which inhabit the corals consumed by O. longirostris, were used as a bioassay to determine the effect of coral diet on fish odour. Crabs preferred the odour of filefish fed their preferred coral over the odour of filefish fed a non-preferred coral, suggesting coral-specific dietary elements that influence odour are sequestered. Crabs also exhibited a similar preference for the odour of filefish fed their preferred coral and odour directly from that coral, suggesting a close chemical match. In behavioural trials, predatory cod were less attracted to filefish odour when presented alongside the coral it had been fed on, suggesting diet can reduce detectability. This is, we believe, the first evidence of diet-induced chemical crypsis in a vertebrate.

Data consists of 1 file: Data_RSPB_RMB_etal.xlsx

Dryad data package includes README file for interpretation of data:

Sheet A) crab bioassays

Crab spp.:  Trapezia cymodoce; Tetralia glaberimma

 

Trial: 1-7

Crab no.: 1-16

Side: L- Left; R- Right; C- Centre

 

Habitat selected:

Trials 1,2,3,4,6,7: PD- Pocillopora damicornis; AS- Acropora spathulata; NC- No choice

 

Trial 5: F- Fish; C- Coral; NC- No choice

Key

TrialCrab spp.Odours

1Both        A. spathulata coral odour vs. P. damicornis coral odour

2Both        A. spathulata fish odor vs. P. damicornis fish odour

3Both        A. spathulata fish odour vs.A. spathulata fish odour

4Both        P. damicornis fish odour vs. P. damicornis fish odour

5T. cymodoceP. damicornis coral odour vs. P. damicornis fish odour

5T. glaberimmaA. spathulata coral odour vs.A. spathulata fish odour

6Both        P. damicornis fish odour vs. A. spathulata coral odour

7Both        A. spathulata fish odour vs. P. damicornis coral odour

 

Sheet B) Predators- activity level

Fish: 21-27

Treatment: 1-6

Key

Treatment   Corals                     Diet of associated fish

1     a) Pocillopora b) Pocillopora   a) Pocillopora b) Pocillopora

2     a) Acropora    b) Acropora     a) Acropora    b) Acropora

3     a) Pocillopora b) Pocillopora   a) Pocillopora b) Acropora

4     a) Acropora    b) Acropora     a) Pocillopora b) Acropora

5     a) No coral    b ) No coral     a) Pocillopora b) Acropora

6     a) Acropora    b) Acropora     a) Pocillopora b) Pocillopora

Note: % data logit-transformed prior to analysis

 

Sheet C) Predators - detectability

Fish:1-18

Note: only active predators were included in this analysis (i.e. 19-27 excluded)

 

Key 1

Treatments   Corals                       Diet of associated fish

3      a) Pocillopora  b) Pocillopora   a) Pocillopora   b) Acropora

4      a) Acropora     b) Acropora      a) Pocillopora   b) Acropora

 

Key 2

A     Proportion of exposed time spent next to fish whose diet differed from associated coral

B     Proportion of exposed time spent next to fish whose diet matched associated coral

C     Proportion of exposed time not next to either fish

 

The full methodology is available in the publication shown in the Related Publications link below.

 

 

Notes

This dataset is available from Dryad in MS Excel (.xlsx) format. Dryad data package: Brooker RM, Munday PL, Chivers DP, Jones GP (2014) Data from: You are what you eat: diet-induced chemical crypsis in a coral-feeding reef fish. Dryad Digital Repository. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.911p1

Created: 2014-11-21

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

145.45205,-14.66069 145.44823,-14.66128 145.44478,-14.66298 145.44205,-14.66562 145.44029,-14.66896 145.43969,-14.67265 145.44029,-14.67635 145.44205,-14.67968 145.44478,-14.68232 145.44823,-14.68402 145.45205,-14.68461 145.45587,-14.68402 145.45931,-14.68232 145.46205,-14.67968 145.4638,-14.67635 145.46441,-14.67265 145.4638,-14.66896 145.46205,-14.66562 145.45931,-14.66298 145.45587,-14.66128 145.45205,-14.66069

145.45204658507,-14.67265006975

text: Experiments were conducted at Lizard Island Research Station, Great Barrier Reef, Australia (14°40′ S; 145°27′ E)

Identifiers
  • Local : researchdata.jcu.edu.au//published/2d814cff3571ecc839e4f781f9c00690
  • Local : 9d98d88057965e351f0098d00a8655ee