Data

Data from: How robust are signals of local adaptation? Exposure to a common fungal pathogen does not disrupt clinal trends in host thermal tolerance.

Monash University
Carla Sgrò (Aggregated by) Connor Bevan (Aggregated by) Jared Lush (Aggregated by) Matthew Hall (Aggregated by)
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.26180/29945108.v1&rft.title=Data from: How robust are signals of local adaptation? Exposure to a common fungal pathogen does not disrupt clinal trends in host thermal tolerance.&rft.identifier=https://doi.org/10.26180/29945108.v1&rft.publisher=Monash University&rft.description=When using this data, please cite the original publication:Jared Lush, Connor Bevan, Carla M. Sgrò, and Matthew D. Hall (2025) How robust are signals of local adaptation? Exposure to a common fungal pathogen does not disrupt clinal trends in host thermal tolerance.Files in this package:Title: lush-et-al-cline-infected-knockdown.csvDescription: Data for the influence of host clone, acclimation temperature, and infection outcomes on variation in time to immobilisation (i.e., knockdown times). Listed are the Daphnia clone (clone: PLD, BWD, WWD, BLD, YYD or OZD), the latitude of the population from which each clone was sampled (latSOUTH in °S), the individual ID of each animal (ID), the acclimation temperature of the animals (temp: 20 °C or 25 °C), the experimental block (block), the size of the animal (in mm), the knockdown times (death_time in minutes), and the outcome of infection (infected, Yes = animals that were exposed to a pathogen and became infected; and for reference, No = control animals that were never exposed to the pathogen).&rft.creator=Carla Sgrò&rft.creator=Connor Bevan&rft.creator=Jared Lush&rft.creator=Matthew Hall&rft.date=2025&rft_rights=CC-BY-4.0&rft_subject=thermal limits&rft_subject=knockdown times&rft_subject=latitudinal clines&rft_subject=host-pathogen interactions&rft_subject=Daphnia&rft_subject=Metschnikowia&rft_subject=, local adaptation&rft_subject=thermal plasticity&rft_subject=acclimation&rft_subject=Freshwater ecology&rft_subject=Biological adaptation&rft_subject=Evolutionary ecology&rft_subject=Evolutionary impacts of climate change&rft_subject=Host-parasite interactions&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

CC-BY-4.0

Full description

When using this data, please cite the original publication:

Jared Lush, Connor Bevan, Carla M. Sgrò, and Matthew D. Hall (2025) How robust are signals of local adaptation? Exposure to a common fungal pathogen does not disrupt clinal trends in host thermal tolerance.

Files in this package:

Title: lush-et-al-cline-infected-knockdown.csv

Description: Data for the influence of host clone, acclimation temperature, and infection outcomes on variation in time to immobilisation (i.e., knockdown times).

Listed are the Daphnia clone (clone: PLD, BWD, WWD, BLD, YYD or OZD), the latitude of the population from which each clone was sampled (latSOUTH in °S), the individual ID of each animal (ID), the acclimation temperature of the animals (temp: 20 °C or 25 °C), the experimental block (block), the size of the animal (in mm), the knockdown times (death_time in minutes), and the outcome of infection (infected, Yes = animals that were exposed to a pathogen and became infected; and for reference, No = control animals that were never exposed to the pathogen).

Issued: 2025-10-27

Created: 2025-10-27

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph
Other Information
Identifiers
ACN 633 798 857