Data

Data from: Ecological correlates of Himalayan musk deer Moschus leucogaster

Charles Sturt University
Singh, Paras Bikram ; Saud, Pradip ; Mainali, Kumar ; Cram, Doug ; Thapa, Arjun ; Chhetri, Nar Bahadur ; Poudyal, Laxman P. ; Baral, Hem Sagar ; Jiang, Zhigang ; Cram, Douglas
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.5061/dryad.v59dh02&rft.title=Data from: Ecological correlates of Himalayan musk deer Moschus leucogaster&rft.identifier=10.5061/dryad.v59dh02&rft.publisher=Dryad&rft.description=Himalayan musk deer (Moschus leucogaster; hereafter musk deer) are endangered as a result of poaching and habitat loss. The species is nocturnal, crepuscular and elusive, making direct observation of habitat use and behavior difficult. However, musk deer establish and repeatedly use the same latrines for defecation. To quantify musk deer habitat correlates, we used observational spatial data based on presence-absence of musk deer latrines, as well as a range of fine spatial-scale ecological covariates. To determine presence-absence of musk deer, we exhaustively searched randomly selected forest trails using a 20-m belt transect in different study sites within the Neshyang Valley in the Annapurna Conservation Area. Subsequently, study sites were classified as habitat or non-habitat for musk deer. A total of 252 plots, 20×20 m were systematically established every 100 m along 51 transects (each ~0.5km long) laid out at different elevations to record a range of ecological habitat variables. We used mixed-effect models and principal component analysis to characterize relationships between deer presence-absence data and habitat variables. We confirmed musk deer use latrines in forests located at higher elevations (3200 - 4200 m) throughout multiple seasons and years. Himalayan birch (Betula utilis) dominated forest, mixed Himalayan fir (Abies spectabilis) and birch forest were preferred over pure Himalayan fir and blue pine (Pinus wallichiana) forest. Greater crown cover and shrub diversity were associated with the presence of musk deer whereas tree height, diameter and diversity were weakly correlated. Topographical attributes including aspect, elevation, distance to water source, and slope were also discriminated by musk deer. Over- and under-story forest management can be used to protect forests likely to have musk deer as predicted by the models to ensure long-term conservation of this rare deer.&rft.creator=Singh, Paras Bikram &rft.creator=Saud, Pradip &rft.creator=Mainali, Kumar &rft.creator=Cram, Doug &rft.creator=Thapa, Arjun &rft.creator=Chhetri, Nar Bahadur &rft.creator=Poudyal, Laxman P. &rft.creator=Baral, Hem Sagar &rft.creator=Jiang, Zhigang &rft.creator=Cram, Douglas &rft.date=2019&rft.relation=http://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/en/publications/f7035edc-cba5-4790-a24f-2b261d006781&rft.coverage=Annapurna Conservation Area&rft_subject=tree height&rft_subject=Moschus leucogaster&rft_subject=Crown Cover Percentage&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Access:

Open

Full description

Himalayan musk deer (Moschus leucogaster; hereafter musk deer) are endangered as a result of poaching and habitat loss. The species is nocturnal, crepuscular and elusive, making direct observation of habitat use and behavior difficult. However, musk deer establish and repeatedly use the same latrines for defecation. To quantify musk deer habitat correlates, we used observational spatial data based on presence-absence of musk deer latrines, as well as a range of fine spatial-scale ecological covariates. To determine presence-absence of musk deer, we exhaustively searched randomly selected forest trails using a 20-m belt transect in different study sites within the Neshyang Valley in the Annapurna Conservation Area. Subsequently, study sites were classified as habitat or non-habitat for musk deer. A total of 252 plots, 20×20 m were systematically established every 100 m along 51 transects (each ~0.5km long) laid out at different elevations to record a range of ecological habitat variables. We used mixed-effect models and principal component analysis to characterize relationships between deer presence-absence data and habitat variables. We confirmed musk deer use latrines in forests located at higher elevations (3200 - 4200 m) throughout multiple seasons and years. Himalayan birch (Betula utilis) dominated forest, mixed Himalayan fir (Abies spectabilis) and birch forest were preferred over pure Himalayan fir and blue pine (Pinus wallichiana) forest. Greater crown cover and shrub diversity were associated with the presence of musk deer whereas tree height, diameter and diversity were weakly correlated. Topographical attributes including aspect, elevation, distance to water source, and slope were also discriminated by musk deer. Over- and under-story forest management can be used to protect forests likely to have musk deer as predicted by the models to ensure long-term conservation of this rare deer.

Notes

External Organisations
Chinese Academy of Sciences; New Mexico State University; University of Maryland; Tribhuvan University; Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation; Kathmandu Nepal*
Associated Persons
Paras Bikram Singh (Creator); Pradip Saud (Creator); Kumar Mainali (Creator); Doug Cram (Creator); Arjun Thapa (Creator); Nar Bahadur Chhetri (Creator); Laxman P. Poudyal (Creator); Zhigang Jiang (Creator); Douglas Cram (Creator)

Issued: 2019-07-10

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

Spatial Coverage And Location

text: Annapurna Conservation Area

Subjects

User Contributed Tags    

Login to tag this record with meaningful keywords to make it easier to discover

Identifiers