Data

Data to account for environmental and socioeconomic assets: case study comparisons (NESP MaC 1.17)

Australian Ocean Data Network

Adams, Vanessa ; Jarvis, Diane

Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]

ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25959/8FMV-6K23&rft.title=Data to account for environmental and socioeconomic assets: case study comparisons (NESP MaC 1.17)&rft.identifier=10.25959/8FMV-6K23&rft.description=Decision-makers seek to account for the socioeconomic values of environmental assets. However, understanding the available frameworks and data can be a barrier. We address this here by summarising the data used across four case studies (3 geographic regions and 3 socio-economic value frameworks) to demonstrate what data are available and how they are applied to support decisions in varied contexts. See 'Lineage' section of this record for additional methodology.Maintenance and Update Frequency: none-plannedStatement: Workshops were conducted with key research users in the marine environment to identify key decision-making questions and regions of interest for them. These workshops were hosted October – November 2021 with participants from 9 difference commonwealth agencies with a management stake in the marine environment. The decision-making contexts identified were: • I need to implement a social and economic monitoring program for an area of marine estate • I need to make a choice between potential management actions • I need a shift to more pro-environmental behaviours Furthermore, when asked where participants were working, a number of key locations were identified including: • The economic exclusive zone (EEZ) • The national marine protected area estate • The Great Barrier Reef • Geographe Marine Park • Port Philip Bay • Partnership programs and sites such as Reef Builder sites along the east coast of Australia and restoration sites in Gulf St Vincent. As a result of the workshops, three case studies were selected: (1) Geographe Marine Park Environmental Accounts, (2) Port Philip Bay Environmental Accounts, and (3) Great Barrier Reef Total Economic Value studies. Each case study began with the source documents and sites provided by workshop participants. Within these main reports and source documents, each type of data used was recorded, and any available links to original source data were located. This data inventory provides a summary of each case study breaking down data considered by type (assets, condition, services, benefits).&rft.creator=Adams, Vanessa &rft.creator=Jarvis, Diane &rft.date=2015&rft.coverage=westlimit=112.00; southlimit=-35.50; eastlimit=115.00; northlimit=-33.00&rft.coverage=westlimit=112.00; southlimit=-35.50; eastlimit=115.00; northlimit=-33.00&rft.coverage=westlimit=142.0781; southlimit=-23.6183; eastlimit=154.00; northlimit=-10.6802&rft.coverage=westlimit=142.0781; southlimit=-23.6183; eastlimit=154.00; northlimit=-10.6802&rft.coverage=westlimit=144.33; southlimit=-38.40; eastlimit=145.16; northlimit=-37.82&rft.coverage=westlimit=144.33; southlimit=-38.40; eastlimit=145.16; northlimit=-37.82&rft_rights=This dataset is hosted by the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, on behalf of NESP Marine and Coastal Hub Project 1.17.&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&rft_rights=Cite data as: Adams, V., & Jarvis, D. (2022). Data to account for environmental and socioeconomic assets: case study comparisons [Data set]. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies. https://doi.org/10.25959/8FMV-6K23&rft_rights=Data was sourced from the NESP Marine and Coastal Hub – the Marine and Coastal Hub is supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program (NESP), administered by the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (DAWE).&rft_subject=oceans&rft_subject=Conservation and Biodiversity&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT&rft_subject=Environmental Management&rft_subject=CONSERVATION&rft_subject=ECONOMIC RESOURCES&rft_subject=National Environmental Science Program (NESP) Marine and Coastal Hub&rft_subject=values&rft_subject=System of Environmental Economic Accounting Ecosystem Accounts (SEEA EA)&rft_subject=ecosystem services&rft_subject=total economic value (TEV)&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Access data via landing page
https://metadata.imas....

Cite Saved to MyRDA Save to MyRDA

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This dataset is hosted by the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, on behalf of NESP Marine and Coastal Hub Project 1.17.

Cite data as: Adams, V., & Jarvis, D. (2022). Data to account for environmental and socioeconomic assets: case study comparisons [Data set]. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies. https://doi.org/10.25959/8FMV-6K23

Data was sourced from the NESP Marine and Coastal Hub – the Marine and Coastal Hub is supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program (NESP), administered by the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (DAWE).

Access:

Other

Brief description

Decision-makers seek to account for the socioeconomic values of environmental assets. However, understanding the available frameworks and data can be a barrier. We address this here by summarising the data used across four case studies (3 geographic regions and 3 socio-economic value frameworks) to demonstrate what data are available and how they are applied to support decisions in varied contexts. See 'Lineage' section of this record for additional methodology.

Lineage

Maintenance and Update Frequency: none-planned

Statement: Workshops were conducted with key research users in the marine environment to identify key decision-making questions and regions of interest for them. These workshops were hosted October – November 2021 with participants from 9 difference commonwealth agencies with a management stake in the marine environment. The decision-making contexts identified were: • "I need to implement a social and economic monitoring program for an area of marine estate" • "I need to make a choice between potential management actions" • "I need a shift to more pro-environmental behaviours" Furthermore, when asked where participants were working, a number of key locations were identified including: • The economic exclusive zone (EEZ) • The national marine protected area estate • The Great Barrier Reef • Geographe Marine Park • Port Philip Bay • Partnership programs and sites such as Reef Builder sites along the east coast of Australia and restoration sites in Gulf St Vincent. As a result of the workshops, three case studies were selected: (1) Geographe Marine Park Environmental Accounts, (2) Port Philip Bay Environmental Accounts, and (3) Great Barrier Reef Total Economic Value studies. Each case study began with the source documents and sites provided by workshop participants. Within these main reports and source documents, each type of data used was recorded, and any available links to original source data were located. This data inventory provides a summary of each case study breaking down data considered by type (assets, condition, services, benefits).

Notes

Credit
National Environmental Science Program (NESP) Marine and Coastal Hub

Data time period: 2021-10-01 to 2022-03-31

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

text: westlimit=112.00; southlimit=-35.50; eastlimit=115.00; northlimit=-33.00

text: westlimit=142.0781; southlimit=-23.6183; eastlimit=154.00; northlimit=-10.6802

text: westlimit=144.33; southlimit=-38.40; eastlimit=145.16; northlimit=-37.82

Subjects

User Contributed Tags

Other Information

(DATA ACCESS - data inventory used for case studies [PDF])

uri : https://data.imas.utas.edu.au/attachments/4fca5250-7381-4a09-b02d-4b7347c495a5/Data_Record_Case_studies_table.pdf External Link

global : 79f7d3b9-92cf-470d-83b6-285efa6d31f6

ror : 01nfmeh72

ror : 04gsp2c11

ror : 01nfmeh72

Project RAiD

raid : 10.71676/ab17a0cc Handle Link

Identifiers

DOI : 10.25959/8FMV-6K23
global : 4fca5250-7381-4a09-b02d-4b7347c495a5