Data

Data to account for environmental and socioeconomic assets: case study comparisons (NESP MaC 1.17)

University of Tasmania, Australia
Adams, Vanessa ; Jarvis, Diane
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25959/8FMV-6K23&rft.title=Data to account for environmental and socioeconomic assets: case study comparisons (NESP MaC 1.17)&rft.identifier=10.25959/8FMV-6K23&rft.description=Decision-makers seek to account for the socioeconomic values of environmental assets. However, understanding the available frameworks and data can be a barrier. We address this here by summarising the data used across four case studies (3 geographic regions and 3 socio-economic value frameworks) to demonstrate what data are available and how they are applied to support decisions in varied contexts. See 'Lineage' section of this record for additional methodology.Maintenance and Update Frequency: none-plannedStatement: Workshops were conducted with key research users in the marine environment to identify key decision-making questions and regions of interest for them. These workshops were hosted October – November 2021 with participants from 9 difference commonwealth agencies with a management stake in the marine environment. The decision-making contexts identified were: • I need to implement a social and economic monitoring program for an area of marine estate • I need to make a choice between potential management actions • I need a shift to more pro-environmental behaviours Furthermore, when asked where participants were working, a number of key locations were identified including: • The economic exclusive zone (EEZ) • The national marine protected area estate • The Great Barrier Reef • Geographe Marine Park • Port Philip Bay • Partnership programs and sites such as Reef Builder sites along the east coast of Australia and restoration sites in Gulf St Vincent. As a result of the workshops, three case studies were selected: (1) Geographe Marine Park Environmental Accounts, (2) Port Philip Bay Environmental Accounts, and (3) Great Barrier Reef Total Economic Value studies. Each case study began with the source documents and sites provided by workshop participants. Within these main reports and source documents, each type of data used was recorded, and any available links to original source data were located. This data inventory provides a summary of each case study breaking down data considered by type (assets, condition, services, benefits).&rft.creator=Adams, Vanessa &rft.creator=Jarvis, Diane &rft.date=2015&rft.coverage=westlimit=112.00; southlimit=-35.50; eastlimit=115.00; northlimit=-33.00&rft.coverage=westlimit=112.00; southlimit=-35.50; eastlimit=115.00; northlimit=-33.00&rft.coverage=westlimit=142.0781; southlimit=-23.6183; eastlimit=154.00; northlimit=-10.6802&rft.coverage=westlimit=142.0781; southlimit=-23.6183; eastlimit=154.00; northlimit=-10.6802&rft.coverage=westlimit=144.33; southlimit=-38.40; eastlimit=145.16; northlimit=-37.82&rft.coverage=westlimit=144.33; southlimit=-38.40; eastlimit=145.16; northlimit=-37.82&rft_rights=This dataset is hosted by the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, on behalf of NESP Marine and Coastal Hub Project 1.17.&rft_rights=Data was sourced from the NESP Marine and Coastal Hub – the Marine and Coastal Hub is supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program (NESP), administered by the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (DAWE).&rft_rights= http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&rft_rights=http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png&rft_rights=WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related&rft_rights=License Graphic&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License&rft_rights=http://creativecommons.org/international/&rft_rights=WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related&rft_rights=WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related&rft_rights=License Text&rft_rights=Cite data as: Adams, V., & Jarvis, D. (2022). Data to account for environmental and socioeconomic assets: case study comparisons [Data set]. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies. https://doi.org/10.25959/8FMV-6K23&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0&rft_subject=oceans&rft_subject=National Environmental Science Program (NESP) Marine and Coastal Hub&rft_subject=values&rft_subject=System of Environmental Economic Accounting Ecosystem Accounts(SEEA EA)&rft_subject=ecosystem services&rft_subject=total economic value (TEV)&rft_subject=CONSERVATION&rft_subject=ECONOMIC RESOURCES&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

This dataset is hosted by the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, on behalf of NESP Marine and Coastal Hub Project 1.17.

Data was sourced from the NESP Marine and Coastal Hub – the Marine and Coastal Hub is supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program (NESP), administered by the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (DAWE).

http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png

WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related

License Graphic

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

http://creativecommons.org/international/

WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related

WWW:LINK-1.0-http--related

License Text

Cite data as: Adams, V., & Jarvis, D. (2022). Data to account for environmental and socioeconomic assets: case study comparisons [Data set]. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies. https://doi.org/10.25959/8FMV-6K23

Access:

Open

Brief description

Decision-makers seek to account for the socioeconomic values of environmental assets. However, understanding the available frameworks and data can be a barrier. We address this here by summarising the data used across four case studies (3 geographic regions and 3 socio-economic value frameworks) to demonstrate what data are available and how they are applied to support decisions in varied contexts. See 'Lineage' section of this record for additional methodology.

Lineage

Maintenance and Update Frequency: none-planned
Statement: Workshops were conducted with key research users in the marine environment to identify key decision-making questions and regions of interest for them. These workshops were hosted October – November 2021 with participants from 9 difference commonwealth agencies with a management stake in the marine environment. The decision-making contexts identified were: • "I need to implement a social and economic monitoring program for an area of marine estate" • "I need to make a choice between potential management actions" • "I need a shift to more pro-environmental behaviours" Furthermore, when asked where participants were working, a number of key locations were identified including: • The economic exclusive zone (EEZ) • The national marine protected area estate • The Great Barrier Reef • Geographe Marine Park • Port Philip Bay • Partnership programs and sites such as Reef Builder sites along the east coast of Australia and restoration sites in Gulf St Vincent. As a result of the workshops, three case studies were selected: (1) Geographe Marine Park Environmental Accounts, (2) Port Philip Bay Environmental Accounts, and (3) Great Barrier Reef Total Economic Value studies. Each case study began with the source documents and sites provided by workshop participants. Within these main reports and source documents, each type of data used was recorded, and any available links to original source data were located. This data inventory provides a summary of each case study breaking down data considered by type (assets, condition, services, benefits).

Notes

Credit
National Environmental Science Program (NESP) Marine and Coastal Hub

Data time period: 2021-10-01 to 2022-03-31

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

115,-33 115,-35.5 112,-35.5 112,-33 115,-33

113.5,-34.25

154,-10.6802 154,-23.6183 142.0781,-23.6183 142.0781,-10.6802 154,-10.6802

148.03905,-17.14925

145.16,-37.82 145.16,-38.4 144.33,-38.4 144.33,-37.82 145.16,-37.82

144.745,-38.11

text: westlimit=112.00; southlimit=-35.50; eastlimit=115.00; northlimit=-33.00

text: westlimit=142.0781; southlimit=-23.6183; eastlimit=154.00; northlimit=-10.6802

text: westlimit=144.33; southlimit=-38.40; eastlimit=145.16; northlimit=-37.82

Other Information
(DATA ACCESS - data inventory used for case studies [PDF])

uri : https://data.imas.utas.edu.au/attachments/4fca5250-7381-4a09-b02d-4b7347c495a5/Data_Record_Case_studies_table.pdf

global : 79f7d3b9-92cf-470d-83b6-285efa6d31f6

Identifiers