Data

Data to account for environmental and socioeconomic assets: case study comparisons (NESP MaC 1.17)

University of Tasmania, Australia

Adams, Vanessa ; Jarvis, Diane

Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]

ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25959/8FMV-6K23&rft.title=Data to account for environmental and socioeconomic assets: case study comparisons (NESP MaC 1.17)&rft.identifier=10.25959/8FMV-6K23&rft.description=Decision-makers seek to account for the socioeconomic values of environmental assets. However, understanding the available frameworks and data can be a barrier. We address this here by summarising the data used across four case studies (3 geographic regions and 3 socio-economic value frameworks) to demonstrate what data are available and how they are applied to support decisions in varied contexts.See 'Lineage' section of this record for additional methodology.Maintenance and Update Frequency: notPlannedStatement: Workshops were conducted with key research users in the marine environment to identify key decision-making questions and regions of interest for them. These workshops were hosted October – November 2021 with participants from 9 difference commonwealth agencies with a management stake in the marine environment. The decision-making contexts identified were: • I need to implement a social and economic monitoring program for an area of marine estate • I need to make a choice between potential management actions • I need a shift to more pro-environmental behaviours Furthermore, when asked where participants were working, a number of key locations were identified including: • The economic exclusive zone (EEZ) • The national marine protected area estate • The Great Barrier Reef • Geographe Marine Park • Port Philip Bay • Partnership programs and sites such as Reef Builder sites along the east coast of Australia and restoration sites in Gulf St Vincent. As a result of the workshops, three case studies were selected: (1) Geographe Marine Park Environmental Accounts, (2) Port Philip Bay Environmental Accounts, and (3) Great Barrier Reef Total Economic Value studies. Each case study began with the source documents and sites provided by workshop participants. Within these main reports and source documents, each type of data used was recorded, and any available links to original source data were located. This data inventory provides a summary of each case study breaking down data considered by type (assets, condition, services, benefits).&rft.creator=Adams, Vanessa &rft.creator=Jarvis, Diane &rft.date=2015&rft.coverage=westlimit=112.00; southlimit=-35.50; eastlimit=115.00; northlimit=-33.00&rft.coverage=westlimit=112.00; southlimit=-35.50; eastlimit=115.00; northlimit=-33.00&rft.coverage=westlimit=142.0781; southlimit=-23.6183; eastlimit=154.00; northlimit=-10.6802&rft.coverage=westlimit=142.0781; southlimit=-23.6183; eastlimit=154.00; northlimit=-10.6802&rft.coverage=westlimit=144.33; southlimit=-38.40; eastlimit=145.16; northlimit=-37.82&rft.coverage=westlimit=144.33; southlimit=-38.40; eastlimit=145.16; northlimit=-37.82&rft_rights=This dataset is hosted by the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, on behalf of NESP Marine and Coastal Hub Project 1.17.&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&rft_rights=Cite data as: Adams, V., & Jarvis, D. (2022). Data to account for environmental and socioeconomic assets: case study comparisons [Data set]. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies. https://doi.org/10.25959/8FMV-6K23&rft_subject=oceans&rft_subject=National Environmental Science Program (NESP) Marine and Coastal Hub&rft_subject=values&rft_subject=System of Environmental Economic Accounting Ecosystem Accounts (SEEA EA)&rft_subject=ecosystem services&rft_subject=total economic value (TEV)&rft_subject=Conservation and Biodiversity&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT&rft_subject=Environmental Management&rft_subject=CONSERVATION&rft_subject=ECONOMIC RESOURCES&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Access data via landing page
https://metadata.imas....

Cite Saved to MyRDA Save to MyRDA

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This dataset is hosted by the Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies (IMAS), University of Tasmania, on behalf of NESP Marine and Coastal Hub Project 1.17.

Cite data as: Adams, V., & Jarvis, D. (2022). Data to account for environmental and socioeconomic assets: case study comparisons [Data set]. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies. https://doi.org/10.25959/8FMV-6K23

Access:

Open

Full description

Decision-makers seek to account for the socioeconomic values of environmental assets. However, understanding the available frameworks and data can be a barrier. We address this here by summarising the data used across four case studies (3 geographic regions and 3 socio-economic value frameworks) to demonstrate what data are available and how they are applied to support decisions in varied contexts.

See 'Lineage' section of this record for additional methodology.

Lineage

Maintenance and Update Frequency: notPlanned

Statement: Workshops were conducted with key research users in the marine environment to identify key decision-making questions and regions of interest for them. These workshops were hosted October – November 2021 with participants from 9 difference commonwealth agencies with a management stake in the marine environment. The decision-making contexts identified were: • "I need to implement a social and economic monitoring program for an area of marine estate" • "I need to make a choice between potential management actions" • "I need a shift to more pro-environmental behaviours" Furthermore, when asked where participants were working, a number of key locations were identified including: • The economic exclusive zone (EEZ) • The national marine protected area estate • The Great Barrier Reef • Geographe Marine Park • Port Philip Bay • Partnership programs and sites such as Reef Builder sites along the east coast of Australia and restoration sites in Gulf St Vincent. As a result of the workshops, three case studies were selected: (1) Geographe Marine Park Environmental Accounts, (2) Port Philip Bay Environmental Accounts, and (3) Great Barrier Reef Total Economic Value studies. Each case study began with the source documents and sites provided by workshop participants. Within these main reports and source documents, each type of data used was recorded, and any available links to original source data were located. This data inventory provides a summary of each case study breaking down data considered by type (assets, condition, services, benefits).

Notes

Credit
The data collections described in this record are funded by the Australian Government Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) through the NESP Marine and Coastal Hub. In addition to NESP (DCCEEW) funding, this project is matched by an equivalent amount of in-kind support and co-investment from project partners and collaborators.

Data time period: 2021-10-01 to 2022-03-31

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

text: westlimit=112.00; southlimit=-35.50; eastlimit=115.00; northlimit=-33.00

text: westlimit=142.0781; southlimit=-23.6183; eastlimit=154.00; northlimit=-10.6802

text: westlimit=144.33; southlimit=-38.40; eastlimit=145.16; northlimit=-37.82

Subjects

User Contributed Tags

Other Information

(DATA ACCESS - data inventory used for case studies [PDF])

url : https://data.imas.utas.edu.au/attachments/4fca5250-7381-4a09-b02d-4b7347c495a5/Data_Record_Case_studies_table.pdf External Link

global : 79f7d3b9-92cf-470d-83b6-285efa6d31f6

local : 01nfmeh72

local : 0000-0002-3509-7901

local : 04gsp2c11

local : 0000-0003-4822-8736

local : 01nfmeh72

local : 0000-0002-3509-7901

NESP MaC Project 1.17 - Research needs for a national approach to socio-economic values of the marine environment, 2021-2022 (UTAS)

doi : 10.71676/ab17a0cc DOI Link

Identifiers

DOI : 10.25959/8FMV-6K23
global : 4fca5250-7381-4a09-b02d-4b7347c495a5