Data

Compositional dissimilarity data for the National Climate Risk Assessment

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Mokany, Karel ; Vickers, Mat
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25919/x3cf-7771&rft.title=Compositional dissimilarity data for the National Climate Risk Assessment&rft.identifier=https://doi.org/10.25919/x3cf-7771&rft.publisher=Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation&rft.description=Compositional dissimilarity, or the potential degree of ecological change, is the proportion of species at a given location expected to be absent from the same location, and potentially replaced by other species, under a changed climate scenario. Compositional dissimilarity ranges from 0 (no change in species composition) to 1 (100 % change in species composition, Ferrier et al., 2007). The data presented here are pixel-based dissimilarities in species composition between the baseline scenario, Australian climate in 1990, and two future climate change scenarios, ACCESS 1.0, and GDFL-ESM2M, at a 2050-centred climate under RCP (Repressentative Concentration Pathway) 8.5 (Harwood et al., 2014). Compositional dissimilarity is estimated in the absence of the effect of land use change by assuming the land is in highest condition, or “reference” condition. As such the expected change in species composition is based on climate change alone.A model of compositional dissimilarity for vascular plants was fitted using generalized dissimilarity modelling (GDM) (Ferrier et al., 2007) based on 1990-centred species records, climate, and other environmental data (Mokany et al. 2018). Compositional dissimilarity was estimated between 1990 and each of the two climate scenarios, and summarised as the arithmetic mean of the estimated compositional dissimilarity for both climate scenarios (ACCESS 1.0 and GDFL-ESM2M).For the National Climate Risk Assessment (NCRA) project, the mean model outputs were summarised (arithmetic mean) by various regions (Aggregate Ecosystem Groups (AEGs), and NCRA regions), available in the links below. The AEG and NCRA region data were reprojected to the projection of the dissimilarity raster, and arithmetic mean dissimilarity was calculated per region of the interaction between AEG and NCRA region.Lineage: The climate scenario data used were published in this related data collection:-\tHarwood T, Donohue R, Harman I, McVicar T, Ota N, Perry J and Williams K (2014) A selection of 9s gridded climate change variables for continental Australia for biodiversity modelling: 1990, 2050, 2070, 2090; GFDL and ACCESS1.0; RCP 4.5, 8.5. v3. Data Collection. CSIRO, Canberra, Australia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25919/5b989f0b36bab. The method used to downscale the climate projection data is published in this report: -\tHarwood T, Williams KJ and Ferrier S (2012) Generation of spatially downscaled climate change predictions for Australia. CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship Working Paper No. 13F, Canberra. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4225/08/584d971d1a4a7.The compositional dissimilarity model for vascular plants that was applied is described in this report: -\tMokany, K., Harwood, T., Ware, C., Williams, K., King, D., Ferrier, S., Nolan, M. (2018) Enhancing landscape data: capacity building for GDM analyses to support biodiversity assessment. Canberra, Australia: CSIRO. csiro:EP185445. https://doi.org/10.25919/ehxd-fe85 The analytical method for estimating the compositional dissimilarity for a location over time, under climate change, is described in:-\tMokany, K., Ware, C., Woolley, S. N. C., Ferrier, S., & Fitzpatrick, M. C. (2022). A working guide to harnessing generalized dissimilarity modelling for biodiversity analysis and conservation assessment. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 31, 802– 821. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13459&rft.creator=Mokany, Karel &rft.creator=Vickers, Mat &rft.date=2025&rft.edition=v2&rft.relation=https://doi.org/10.25919/5b989f0b36bab&rft.relation=https://doi.org/10.4225/08/584d971d1a4a7&rft.relation=https://doi.org/10.25919/ehxd-fe85&rft.relation=https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13459&rft.coverage=westlimit=111.0; southlimit=-45.0; eastlimit=156.0; northlimit=-10.0; projection=WGS84&rft_rights=Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&rft_rights=Data is accessible online and may be reused in accordance with licence conditions&rft_rights=All Rights (including copyright) CSIRO 2025.&rft_subject=Climate&rft_subject=hazard&rft_subject=risk assessment&rft_subject=Australia&rft_subject=NCRA&rft_subject=National Climate Risk Assessment&rft_subject=natural environments&rft_subject=Ecological impacts of climate change and ecological adaptation&rft_subject=Climate change impacts and adaptation&rft_subject=ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Open Licence view details
CC-BY

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Data is accessible online and may be reused in accordance with licence conditions

All Rights (including copyright) CSIRO 2025.

Access:

Open view details

Accessible for free

Contact Information



Full description

Compositional dissimilarity, or the potential degree of ecological change, is the proportion of species at a given location expected to be absent from the same location, and potentially replaced by other species, under a changed climate scenario. Compositional dissimilarity ranges from 0 (no change in species composition) to 1 (100 % change in species composition, Ferrier et al., 2007).
The data presented here are pixel-based dissimilarities in species composition between the baseline scenario, Australian climate in 1990, and two future climate change scenarios, ACCESS 1.0, and GDFL-ESM2M, at a 2050-centred climate under RCP (Repressentative Concentration Pathway) 8.5 (Harwood et al., 2014). Compositional dissimilarity is estimated in the absence of the effect of land use change by assuming the land is in highest condition, or “reference” condition. As such the expected change in species composition is based on climate change alone.
A model of compositional dissimilarity for vascular plants was fitted using generalized dissimilarity modelling (GDM) (Ferrier et al., 2007) based on 1990-centred species records, climate, and other environmental data (Mokany et al. 2018). Compositional dissimilarity was estimated between 1990 and each of the two climate scenarios, and summarised as the arithmetic mean of the estimated compositional dissimilarity for both climate scenarios (ACCESS 1.0 and GDFL-ESM2M).
For the National Climate Risk Assessment (NCRA) project, the mean model outputs were summarised (arithmetic mean) by various regions (Aggregate Ecosystem Groups (AEGs), and NCRA regions), available in the links below. The AEG and NCRA region data were reprojected to the projection of the dissimilarity raster, and arithmetic mean dissimilarity was calculated per region of the interaction between AEG and NCRA region.

Lineage: The climate scenario data used were published in this related data collection:
-\tHarwood T, Donohue R, Harman I, McVicar T, Ota N, Perry J and Williams K (2014) A selection of 9s gridded climate change variables for continental Australia for biodiversity modelling: 1990, 2050, 2070, 2090; GFDL and ACCESS1.0; RCP 4.5, 8.5. v3. Data Collection. CSIRO, Canberra, Australia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25919/5b989f0b36bab.

The method used to downscale the climate projection data is published in this report:
-\tHarwood T, Williams KJ and Ferrier S (2012) Generation of spatially downscaled climate change predictions for Australia. CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship Working Paper No. 13F, Canberra. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4225/08/584d971d1a4a7.

The compositional dissimilarity model for vascular plants that was applied is described in this report:
-\tMokany, K., Harwood, T., Ware, C., Williams, K., King, D., Ferrier, S., Nolan, M. (2018) Enhancing landscape data: capacity building for GDM analyses to support biodiversity assessment. Canberra, Australia: CSIRO. csiro:EP185445. https://doi.org/10.25919/ehxd-fe85

The analytical method for estimating the compositional dissimilarity for a location over time, under climate change, is described in:
-\tMokany, K., Ware, C., Woolley, S. N. C., Ferrier, S., & Fitzpatrick, M. C. (2022). A working guide to harnessing generalized dissimilarity modelling for biodiversity analysis and conservation assessment. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 31, 802– 821. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13459

Available: 2025-08-29

Data time period: 1990-01-01 to 2050-01-01

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph

156,-10 156,-45 111,-45 111,-10 156,-10

133.5,-27.5

ACN 633 798 857