Data
Viewed: [[ro.stat.viewed]] Cited: [[ro.stat.cited]] Accessed: [[ro.stat.accessed]]
ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Adc&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2FANDS&rft_id=info:doi10.25955/5f7ac4bdb1c1d&rft.title=Challenges for ECRs in STEMM - On-line survey data supporting BioRxiv manuscript&rft.identifier=https://doi.org/10.25955/5f7ac4bdb1c1d&rft.publisher=Federation University Australia&rft.description=This data set supports the article Survey of Australian STEMM Early Career Researchers published in BioRxiv in February 2020Abstract:We sought to understand the pressures on Early Career Researchers (ECR) in the Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, & Medicine (STEMM) disciplines, collecting data from 658 ECRs working in Australia. Respondents indicated a “love of science”, but most also indicated an intention to leave their position. Decisions were primarily motivated by job insecurity (52%), while grievances included poor supervision (60%), bullying or harassment (34%), inequitable hiring practices (39%) and poor support for families (9.6%). A concerning rate of “questionable research practices” by colleagues (34.1% to 41.1%) was reported to have impacted ECR career advancement. Our study links recent reports that characterise the health of the research industry, providing direct insight from ECRs on job insecurity, workplace culture challenges, and the logical rise of questionable research practices. Internationally, nationally and institutionally the research community needs to improve job security (care for our people) and the quality of research data (our product).&rft.creator=Associate Professor Michael Doran&rft.creator=Carolyn Johnstone&rft.creator=Jo-ann Larkins&rft.creator=Katherine Christian&rft.creator=wendy wright&rft.date=2023&rft_rights=CC-BY-NC-4.0&rft_subject=Science&rft_subject=STEM&rft_subject=STEMM&rft_subject=early-career&rft_subject=postdoctoral&rft_subject=questionable research practices&rft_subject=professional development&rft_subject=family responsibilities&rft_subject=mentoring&rft_subject=job insecurity&rft_subject=funding&rft_subject=Australia&rft_subject=Higher Education&rft_subject=Sociology and Social Studies of Science and Technology&rft_subject=Higher education&rft_subject=Sociology and social studies of science and technology&rft.type=dataset&rft.language=English Access the data

Licence & Rights:

Non-Commercial Licence view details
CC-BY-NC

CC-BY-NC-4.0

Full description

This data set supports the article Survey of Australian STEMM Early Career Researchers published in BioRxiv in February 2020

Abstract:
We sought to understand the pressures on Early Career Researchers (ECR) in the Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, & Medicine (STEMM) disciplines, collecting data from 658 ECRs working in Australia. Respondents indicated a “love of science”, but most also indicated an intention to leave their position. Decisions were primarily motivated by job insecurity (52%), while grievances included poor supervision (60%), bullying or harassment (34%), inequitable hiring practices (39%) and poor support for families (9.6%). A concerning rate of “questionable research practices” by colleagues (34.1% to 41.1%) was reported to have impacted ECR career advancement. Our study links recent reports that characterise the health of the research industry, providing direct insight from ECRs on job insecurity, workplace culture challenges, and the logical rise of questionable research practices. Internationally, nationally and institutionally the research community needs to improve job security (care for our people) and the quality of research data (our product).

Issued: 2020-12-09

Created: 2020-12-28

This dataset is part of a larger collection

Click to explore relationships graph
Identifiers